Re: stymied again on port dependent on texlive: lcdf-typetools

2012-06-15 Thread Brandon Allbery
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 10:53 PM, Murray Eisenberg < murrayeisenb...@gmail.com> wrote: > But what does the texlive variant do? Why would one want or not want that > variant? So far as I could see, the docs for lcdf-typetools don't describe > that. > But the variant's associated code does: it rem

Re: stymied again on port dependent on texlive: lcdf-typetools

2012-06-15 Thread Jeremy Lavergne
Disabling variants is done by using the minus sign prefix. Sudo port whatever -texlive disables the variant. Murray Eisenberg wrote: >On 6/15/12 6:53 PM, Jeremy Lavergne wrote: >>> I don't understand how that would work: I thought lcdf-typetools >depends on the libraries and/or binaries of eith

Re: stymied again on port dependent on texlive: lcdf-typetools

2012-06-15 Thread Murray Eisenberg
On 6/15/12 6:53 PM, Jeremy Lavergne wrote: I don't understand how that would work: I thought lcdf-typetools depends on the libraries and/or binaries of either texlive or the Japanese version ptex of TeX. The texlive variant adds the texlive-bin dependency exclusively for kpathsea. If you don'

Re: stymied again on port dependent on texlive: lcdf-typetools

2012-06-15 Thread Jeremy Lavergne
> I don't understand how that would work: I thought lcdf-typetools depends on > the libraries and/or binaries of either texlive or the Japanese version ptex > of TeX. The texlive variant adds the texlive-bin dependency exclusively for kpathsea. If you don't use the variant, there is no dependen

Re: stymied again on port dependent on texlive: lcdf-typetools

2012-06-15 Thread Murray Eisenberg
On 6/15/12 6:42 PM, Jeremy Lavergne wrote: (1) Exactly what do I need to change in the lcdf-typetools portfile to delete the dependency? The relevant portion is: default_variants +texlive install it with that variant disabled: sudo port install lcdf-typetools -texlive I don't understand

Re: stymied again on port dependent on texlive: lcdf-typetools

2012-06-15 Thread Jeremy Lavergne
> (1) Exactly what do I need to change in the lcdf-typetools portfile to delete > the dependency? The relevant portion is: > > default_variants +texlive install it with that variant disabled: sudo port install lcdf-typetools -texlive smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___

stymied again on port dependent on texlive: lcdf-typetools

2012-06-15 Thread Murray Eisenberg
I want to install the port of lcdf-typetools. It depends on texlive-bin. And texlive-bin in turn depends on texlive-common. I do _not_ want to use macports to install any components of texlive whatsoever, as I already have a complete, working installation of texlive on my OS X Mac via the MacT

Re: building high-performance Octave

2012-06-15 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Jun 15, 2012, at 10:13, Pascal Dupuis wrote: > variant hpc description {build mpif77 and mpif90 using > -ftree-vectorize} conflicts gcc42 > gcc43 gcc44 gcc45 g95 { >configure.args-delete --disable-mpi-f77 --disable-mpi-f90 >configure.cflags-delete -m32 >configure.cflags-

Re: Xcode 4.3.3?

2012-06-15 Thread Lawrence Velázquez
On Jun 15, 2012, at 5:51 a.m., Fabrizio Salvatore wrote: > Do I do it from within Xcode or do I have to run something on the command > line? Not sure if there's a way to do it from the command line. I opened up Xcode, which then asked if I wanted to update the Command-Line Tools. If it doesn't

Re: Rebuilding broken ports over...and over...and over

2012-06-15 Thread Jeremy Lavergne
> Um, I thought I'd done that (and more) when I did "sudo port uninstall > installed". Yes, and you did "clean all": > Some time ago, I followed the migration instructions on another machine and > did "sudo port clean all". Is that a good option? I remember being > surprised at how long it t

Re: Rebuilding broken ports over...and over...and over

2012-06-15 Thread Craig Treleaven
At 1:37 PM -0400 6/15/12, Jeremy Lavergne wrote: > I then cleaned perl5.12 and tried "sudo port install perl5.12 +universal". It trundled away installing several universal versions of dependencies but while 'finishing' it found 4 broken ports and reinstalled them. Then it found 2 broken port

Re: Rebuilding broken ports over...and over...and over

2012-06-15 Thread Jeremy Lavergne
> I then cleaned perl5.12 and tried "sudo port install perl5.12 +universal". > It trundled away installing several universal versions of dependencies but > while 'finishing' it found 4 broken ports and reinstalled them. Then it > found 2 broken ports (different this time) and reinstalled them.

Re: Rebuilding broken ports over...and over...and over

2012-06-15 Thread Jeremy Lavergne
Bwah haha. I see that you did at the next command. Weee smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users

Re: Rebuilding broken ports over...and over...and over

2012-06-15 Thread Jeremy Lavergne
Perl needs cleaned: > Error: Requested variants "" do not match original selection "+universal". > Please use the same variants again, perform 'port clean perl5.12' or specify > the force option (-f). smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___

Re: Rebuilding broken ports over...and over...and over

2012-06-15 Thread Craig Treleaven
At 1:01 PM -0400 6/15/12, Craig Treleaven wrote: The attached log ...is now attached. Sigh. MacPorts install fail 2012Jun15.txt Description: Binary data ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.or

Rebuilding broken ports over...and over...and over

2012-06-15 Thread Craig Treleaven
Hi: I seem to be unable to upgrade or install Qt4-mac on an older Core2 Duo mini. At first, I tried to just use port upgrade (after a selfupdate). It fell over but I didn't save any logs. This machine has had MacPorts on it for a long time--4 years plus or minus--but only for a couple of s

building high-performance Octave

2012-06-15 Thread Pascal Dupuis
Hello, I'm an Octave contributor in some specific fields like localisation. I recently changed of job and now I have at my disposal an Intel Mac running OSX 10.5. I would like to build a high-performance version of Octave, this implies to built it with either gcc46 either gcc47, using 64 bits mode

Re: Xcode 4.3.3?

2012-06-15 Thread Jim Graham
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 08:42:33PM -0400, Richard L. Hamilton wrote: > Might want to do an update of the command line tools that come with > Xcode once it's installed, though. At least, I did, and it didn't seem > to hurt anything. For the average user, like me, who is just using the tools from

Re: Xcode 4.3.3?

2012-06-15 Thread Fabrizio Salvatore
Do I do it from within Xcode or do I have to run something on the command line? THanks! Fab On 15 June 2012 01:42, Richard L. Hamilton wrote: > > On Jun 14, 2012, at 12:43 PM, Andrea D'Amore wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 4:25 PM, Fabrizio Salvatore > > wrote: > > > >> once I have updat