On Feb 23, 2012, at 17:30, Brandon LeBlanc wrote:
> I guess I should have been a little clearer. I installed the command line
> utilities through the Xcode download preference pane. After that, I stopped
> receiving errors when running MacPorts.
Yes, the command line utilities are *required*;
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 18:26, Brandon LeBlanc wrote:
> I haven't done any extensive testing with the command line tools
> installable within Xcode, but I will say after installing that,
> MacPorts worked just fine without error for me.
>
There are a number of ports (off the top of my head, MacV
I guess I should have been a little clearer. I installed the command line
utilities through the Xcode download preference pane. After that, I stopped
receiving errors when running MacPorts.
--
Brandon LeBlanc
Sent with Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig)
On Thursday, February 23, 20
I'm not sure, but I think that some ports will require the full xcode
to build. My understanding is that Macports officially requires Xcode
so that they don't have to support a bunch of different situations.
So, it might work, but "you're on your own."
Scott
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Bran
I haven't done any extensive testing with the command line tools
installable within Xcode, but I will say after installing that,
MacPorts worked just fine without error for me.
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 9:00 AM,
wrote:
> Message: 9
> Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 11:08:32 -0600
> From: Ryan Schmidt
> To:
This is a refreshing change. You are absolutely correct. My head got
twisted by the frustration.
I apologize for the fruitless excursion.
Justin C. Walker wrote:
On Feb 23, 2012, at 12:58 , John Brown wrote:
Dear Jeremy,
Is your explanation for Apple publishing applications with know
On Feb 23, 2012, at 12:58 , John Brown wrote:
> Dear Jeremy,
>
> Is your explanation for Apple publishing applications with known bugs that
> I'm a troll?
Speaking from the cheap seats, there is no point in carrying on a long
discussion about Apple policies on a non-Apple list. There are n
Dear Jeremy,
Is your explanation for Apple publishing applications with known
bugs that I'm a troll?
The `obsolete OS' excuse for that kind of action is completely
unethical. I'm just a very old coder, not a troll, and not accepting of
profits at any social cost. Putting broken stuff o
> The clamav source configure script found that error still embedded in the
> compiler from an Xcode dmg I downloaded yesterday from the Apple developer
> site. Doesn't Apple check for known bugs in their download packages? The
> macports clamav made no such complaint. Exactly how does the mos
On Feb 23, 2012, at 3:29 PM, John Brown wrote:
> The clamav source configure script found that error still embedded in the
> compiler from an Xcode dmg I downloaded yesterday from the Apple developer
> site.
an old .dmg for an old Xcode for an unsupported OS version.
> Doesn't Apple check for
Dear Daniel,
The clamav source configure script found that error still embedded
in the compiler from an Xcode dmg I downloaded yesterday from the Apple
developer site. Doesn't Apple check for known bugs in their download
packages? The macports clamav made no such complaint. Exactly how does
On Feb 23, 2012, at 14:09, John Brown wrote:
> I downloaded it from the Apple developer site yesterday. If that isn't a 2012
> Apple download, then what is???
You're talking about Xcode 2.5. It is the latest version of Xcode for Tiger,
however it was released in 2007. There will be no newer ve
> I downloaded it from the Apple developer site yesterday. If that isn't a
> 2012 Apple download, then what is???
Being able to download it does not make it current.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
macports-users mailing l
Dear Jeremy,
I downloaded it from the Apple developer site yesterday. If that
isn't a 2012 Apple download, then what is???
Shalom,
John B Brown
j...@vcn.com
358 High Street
Buffalo, Wyoming
82834
"Freedom is not worth having if it does not i
> After a long download and a short installation the result is the macports
> clamscan never stopped, and was still going almost eight hours after
> starting. What's that all about? I finaly gave it a control-C.
My understanding is clamscan is a process that's manually launched and clamd is
t
On Feb 23, 2012, at 2:06 PM, John Brown wrote:
> After a long download and a short installation the result is the macports
> clamscan never stopped, and was still going almost eight hours after
> starting. What's that all about? I finaly gave it a control-C.
you could try clamscan -v to get ver
> That bug should NOT be in a 2012 download! It was resolved in 2006.
> Suggestions, anyone?
Xcode 2.5 is not a 2012 download.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
Dear Jeremy,
After a long download and a short installation the result is the
macports clamscan never stopped, and was still going almost eight hours
after starting. What's that all about? I finaly gave it a control-C.
This is my machine.
Machine Name:iBook G4
Machine Model:P
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 23/02/2012 15:34, James Anslow wrote:
> Is it known if self update (via rsync.macports.org) for macports uses rsync
> over ssh? It may be the network I'm on, as I can't ssh into my home server
> either.
Can't see anything in my known_hosts file
Is it known if self update (via rsync.macports.org) for macports uses rsync
over ssh? It may be the network I'm on, as I can't ssh into my home server
either.
On 23 Feb 2012, at 15:31, Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
>> Can anyone confirm issues with rsync.macports.org? - specifically, it being
>> a de
> Can anyone confirm issues with rsync.macports.org? - specifically, it being a
> default apache "It works!" page? I'm unable to self update.
Works fine here.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
macports-users mailing list
macpo
Hi All,
Can anyone confirm issues with rsync.macports.org? - specifically, it being a
default apache "It works!" page? I'm unable to self update.
___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/lis
On 23 February 2012 03:36, Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
>> it *does*, for some reason, still respond to "man rename".
>
> That's rename(2). If it's a command line program, it'd be rename(1).
>
> These categories plan am important trickle down in this situation ;-)
Right you are; well spotted. In my def
23 matches
Mail list logo
