On Dec 9, 2011, at 21:51, Rodolfo Aramayo wrote:
> Am I the only one having issues building root?
File an issue in the issue tracker, if none of the existing tickets about root
describe your problem.
___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@li
On 10/12/11 03:24, "Phillip Koebbe" wrote:
> I was referring to the bit about the mail going directly to my inbox and
> bypassing the filters I have set up. I use Gmail IMAP and have a filter that
> reads the from address and applies a particular label to the message, and when
> it comes down to
Folks,
Am I the only one having issues building root?
It is failing to build in all my 12 machines
The last 50 lines of the log say:
==:info:build /usr/bin/g++-4.2 -dynamiclib -single_module
-Wl,-dead_strip_dylibs -install_name /opt/local/lib/root/libRooStats.so -O2
-m64 -mmacosx-version-min=10
On Dec 9, 2011, at 6:55 PM, Phil Dobbin wrote:
> On 10/12/11 00:28, "Phillip Koebbe" wrote:
>
>> Humorously, this happened to me with this very email! I guess Google and
>> Apple
>> Mail are being bad netizens. Sigh.
>
> It's really just as simple as "looking" at who you're replying to. If it
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 01:45, Chris Jones wrote:
>
> Your error below is the mesa/glew X11 problem I mentioned. You need to either
> install root without the opengl variant enabled (so if you already have an
> older root installed with it, uninstall and reinstall) or reinstall your flew
> with
On 10/12/11 00:28, "Phillip Koebbe" wrote:
> Humorously, this happened to me with this very email! I guess Google and Apple
> Mail are being bad netizens. Sigh.
It's really just as simple as "looking" at who you're replying to. If it was
snail mail, you wouldn't expect to address a letter to a d
On 10 Dec 2011, at 12:37am, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 01:21, Chris Jones wrote:
>>
>> On 10 Dec 2011, at 12:02am, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 00:45, Chris Jones wrote:
On 9 Dec 2011, at 11:33pm, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> Hello,
>
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 01:21, Chris Jones wrote:
>
> On 10 Dec 2011, at 12:02am, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 00:45, Chris Jones wrote:
>>> On 9 Dec 2011, at 11:33pm, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>>>
Hello,
I'm trying to compile Root with CMake (the Root package is Ma
On Dec 9, 2011, at 5:16 PM, Roger Pack wrote:
> Fascinatingly, after following this advice of
> http://woozle.org/~neale/papers/reply-to-still-harmful.html (which was
> recommended in this thread)
>
> "Some people complain that they'll get two copies of the same email.
> Since they're on the lis
On 10 Dec 2011, at 12:02am, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 00:45, Chris Jones wrote:
>> On 9 Dec 2011, at 11:33pm, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I'm trying to compile Root with CMake (the Root package is MacPorts is
>>> broken, but even if it wasn't, there might b
On 9/12/11 23:16, "Roger Pack" wrote:
> So apparently...I'm supposed to just tell them they aren't compliant [?]
> (In reality what I should send it back to the group as a "To"
> field--does anybody know? What do other gmail users out there do?)
Copy & paste.
Cheers,
Phil...
--
Nothing t
> I did this in the last thread I participated in.
> I hit "reply all" in gmail, it receives a "To:" field of the original
> author, and a CC: field of the mailing list. I think this is what the
> above is saying is what we should do.
RFC 2822 and the pleas about "Reply-To" munging are aimed at p
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 00:45, Chris Jones wrote:
> On 9 Dec 2011, at 11:33pm, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm trying to compile Root with CMake (the Root package is MacPorts is
>> broken, but even if it wasn't, there might be reasons why I would want
>> to use a standalone version).
>
On 9/12/11 23:50, "Lawrence Velázquez" wrote:
>> PS Did you BCC the list on this email or something? Don't do that! :) :)
>
> Fittingly, he accidentally sent it to me as a private reply, and I resent it
> to the list.
The reply to which he just sent to me not the list...
Cheers,
Phil...
> PS Did you BCC the list on this email or something? Don't do that! :) :)
Fittingly, he accidentally sent it to me as a private reply, and I resent it to
the list.
vq
___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.ma
On 9 Dec 2011, at 11:33pm, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to compile Root with CMake (the Root package is MacPorts is
> broken, but even if it wasn't, there might be reasons why I would want
> to use a standalone version).
In what way is ROOT broken for you ? I know there are a f
I think you should send the email to whom you desire. You need to use
your email client (I use gmail) to accomplish this in whatever way it
works.
Usually if I am responding to a post to the mailing list I just hit
reply all. This causes the To: field to contain the authors address
and the Cc: f
On 9 Dec 2011, at 11:12pm, Chris Jones wrote:
>
> On 9 Dec 2011, at 10:50pm, Lawrence Velázquez wrote:
>
>> See also: https://trac.macports.org/wiki/FAQ#dependonvariant
>
> Yes, I know about that. I just hoped there was some way to check if a certain
> variant of a port was installed or not.
Hello,
I'm trying to compile Root with CMake (the Root package is MacPorts is
broken, but even if it wasn't, there might be reasons why I would want
to use a standalone version).
When running ccmake I get the following error:
CMake Error at
/opt/local/share/cmake-2.8/Modules/CMakeDetermineFort
Fascinatingly, after following this advice of
http://woozle.org/~neale/papers/reply-to-still-harmful.html (which was
recommended in this thread)
"Some people complain that they'll get two copies of the same email.
Since they're on the list, their first copy is the one sent to them by
the list. Whe
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Chris Jones wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible for a port to check if one of its dependencies is installed
> with a required variant, and warn if not ?
>
> I ask since the opengl variant of the root port requires mesa to be installed
> with the x11 variant, which is
On 9 Dec 2011, at 10:50pm, Lawrence Velázquez wrote:
> See also: https://trac.macports.org/wiki/FAQ#dependonvariant
Yes, I know about that. I just hoped there was some way to check if a certain
variant of a port was installed or not.
In this case it seems, looking at the mesa variants, to be a
On 9 Dec 2011, at 10:34pm, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
>
> On Dec 9, 2011, at 2:23 PM, Chris Jones wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Is it possible for a port to check if one of its dependencies is installed
>> with a required variant, and warn if not ?
>>
>> I ask since the opengl variant of the root por
See also: https://trac.macports.org/wiki/FAQ#dependonvariant
vq
On Dec 9, 2011, at 5:34 p.m., Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
>
> On Dec 9, 2011, at 2:23 PM, Chris Jones wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Is it possible for a port to check if one of its dependencies is installed
>> with a required variant, and
On Dec 9, 2011, at 2:23 PM, Chris Jones wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible for a port to check if one of its dependencies is installed
> with a required variant, and warn if not ?
>
> I ask since the opengl variant of the root port requires mesa to be installed
> with the x11 variant, which is n
Hi,
Is it possible for a port to check if one of its dependencies is installed with
a required variant, and warn if not ?
I ask since the opengl variant of the root port requires mesa to be installed
with the x11 variant, which is not the default. The build fails if this isn't
the case.
The t
On Dec 9, 2011, at 03:45, Stuart Robertson wrote:
> I have two macs, both running 10.7.2 and Macports 2.0.3
> Symbol not found: _rs_appendflush
> Referenced from: /opt/local/lib/librsync.1.dylib
> Expected in: flat namespace
> in /opt/local/lib/librsync.1.dylib
Looks like:
https://trac.macport
I have two macs, both running 10.7.2 and Macports 2.0.3, both
up-to-date. One Macports installation is six months old, the other
new. On the older installation rdiff-backup installs and runs, on the
new Macports installation rdiff-backup installs but fails to run with
the following error.
/opt/loc
28 matches
Mail list logo
