On Apr 4, 2010, at 19:32, Mike Alexander wrote:
> On April 4, 2010 2:53:25 PM -0700 Scott Haneda wrote:
>
>> port search exif brings up a nice batch of stuff. Any suggestions?
>> I am looking for a pretty simple `./whatever image.jpg` and be done
>> with it.
>
> I use exiftool (p5-image-exift
--On April 4, 2010 2:53:25 PM -0700 Scott Haneda
wrote:
port search exif brings up a nice batch of stuff. Any suggestions?
I am looking for a pretty simple `./whatever image.jpg` and be done
with it.
I use exiftool (p5-image-exiftool) for this and it works well.
Although it bills itself as
On Apr 4, 2010, at 3:09 PM, Faisal Moledina wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 5:53 PM, Scott Haneda wrote:
>> port search exif brings up a nice batch of stuff. Any suggestions? I am
>> looking for a pretty simple `./whatever image.jpg` and be done with it.
>
> First hit from port search exif is
On 2010-04-04 , at 14:53 , Scott Haneda wrote:
>
> I am looking for something to easily read mostly image exif data. Arbitrary
> file data such as mp3 tags and other misc file attributes would be a plus.
for MP3
id3lib @3.8.3 audio/id3lib
id3tool
On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 17:53, Scott Haneda wrote:
>
> I am looking for something to easily read mostly image exif data. Arbitrary
> file data such as mp3 tags and other misc file attributes would be a plus.
exif, exiftags, jhead, and exiv2 are all pretty decently
straightforward to use. jhead
On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 5:53 PM, Scott Haneda wrote:
> port search exif brings up a nice batch of stuff. Any suggestions? I am
> looking for a pretty simple `./whatever image.jpg` and be done with it.
First hit from port search exif is exif @0.6.17. Haven't used it
extensively but `exif IMG_235
I am looking for something to easily read mostly image exif data. Arbitrary
file data such as mp3 tags and other misc file attributes would be a plus.
Right now, I will open an image in Photoshop, or an image editor, using their
tools to read the exif file data. Sometimes there are extended at
PS: It seems that you are doing it anyway in the Portfile:
112 # Force 32-bit, inline-asm
113 if {$build_arch == "x86_64"} {
114 configure.build_arch i386
115 } elseif {$build_arch == "ppc64"} {
116 configure.build_arch ppc
117 }
aren't you? Then why isn't it compi
On Sun, Apr 04, 2010 at 11:50:17AM -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> On Apr 4, 2010, at 10:26, John J. Foster wrote:
>
> > I'm getting the following output while trying to upgrade. I have already
> > done a sudo port clean libao.
>
> Everybody running 10.5 or earlier will see that error. Here's the ti
On Apr 4, 2010, at 08:01, Janosch Peters wrote:
> I use macports fot about 1.5 years now. Most things work great and MP
> has some lovely features like variants. However, it appears quite often
> that some ports are broken for various different reasons. E.g. the
> quartz variant of gtk2 lead t
On Apr 4, 2010, at 08:41, Ctalk Project wrote:
> I installed macports (OS X 10.4) and then installed and built the gcc44
> package without
> any issues. Per the macports installation, I guess, /opt/local/bin is now in
> the path, so the
> macports GCC is the compiler in general use,
Only if y
On Apr 4, 2010, at 10:26, John J. Foster wrote:
> I'm getting the following output while trying to upgrade. I have already
> done a sudo port clean libao.
Everybody running 10.5 or earlier will see that error. Here's the ticket:
http://trac.macports.org/ticket/24340
A patch is there, so you cou
Hi all,
I'm getting the following output while trying to upgrade. I have already
done a sudo port clean libao.
Not sure how to proceed.
Thanks.
fes...@magpie ~/src/mutt $ sudo port upgrade outdated
---> Computing dependencies for libao
---> Fetching libao
---> Verifying checksum(s) for libao
On 2010-04-04 15:01 , Janosch Peters wrote:
> Has maintaing two branches been already discussed on the list?
Yes. But it has been postponed until we get a constant automatic build
coverage. Otherwise it is not quite possible to decide when to merge
from unstable to stable.
See this old thread on
Greetings -
I installed macports (OS X 10.4) and then installed and built the
gcc44 package without
So how do I tell macports to use the newly installed compiler?
Hi,
as you're using 10.4, on your machine the gcc_select command should
work. gcc_select -l lists your installed gcc versio
On 2010-04-04 15:41 , Ctalk Project wrote:
> So how do I tell macports to use the newly installed compiler?
You still need to install Xcode Developer Tools [1] to build ports. It
does not only provide the Xcode application and compilers, but also
additional headers and frameworks. Note that Apple
Greetings -
I installed macports (OS X 10.4) and then installed and built the
gcc44 package without
any issues. Per the macports installation, I guess, /opt/local/bin
is now in the path, so the
macports GCC is the compiler in general use, and for non-macports
sources it works okay.
When
Hi there,
I use macports fot about 1.5 years now. Most things work great and MP
has some lovely features like variants. However, it appears quite often
that some ports are broken for various different reasons. E.g. the
quartz variant of gtk2 lead to crashes in gimp2 and the bug was not
fixed f
Hello,
how can I tell port to use the i386 version? I didn't find it under variants.
And won't it mess up the configuration if I change the defaults of macports?
Thanks,
Pau
2010/4/4 Jeremy Huddleston :
>
> On Mar 31, 2010, at 13:57, Pau wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> sorry for the spamming... I hav
Hello,
I am a relative newcomer to MacPorts, and I am having trouble upgrading
mesa to the latest version on my Mac OSX 10.4.11 (PPC) system. I know a
ticket has been filed for it, but it has been marked "fixed". I still
get errors involving Xplugin.h when I try to upgrade (and I have run
"sudo po
20 matches
Mail list logo