MacPorts 1.8.2 has been released

2010-01-01 Thread Joshua Root
The MacPorts Project is pleased to announce the release of version 1.8.2. This is a bugfix release with small changes only. See the ChangeLog [1] for the list of changes. If you already have MacPorts installed, the preferred method for updating is to run: sudo port selfupdate For new installs,

Re: Cleaning the cruft from my MacPorts

2010-01-01 Thread Joshua Root
On 2010-1-2 17:03 , Scott Haneda wrote: > A few things have led to a less than awesome repo of local software that > MacPorts has helped me to install. By no fault of MacPorts or course; > though I am often abusing MacPorts to get something intalled for myself, > or maybe making a port for submiss

Cleaning the cruft from my MacPorts

2010-01-01 Thread Scott Haneda
A few things have led to a less than awesome repo of local software that MacPorts has helped me to install. By no fault of MacPorts or course; though I am often abusing MacPorts to get something intalled for myself, or maybe making a port for submission, or on those rare occasions, I can g

Re: InsightToolKit did not build

2010-01-01 Thread Frank J. R. Hanstick
Hello, I am not going to ask you to build on the 466 MHz, that might take you to until the next decade. Sounds like Apple needs to do a little work on the intel scheduler. Even running with both cpu's at or near 100% (which means a faster bus would not buy me very much since I am getting

Re: InsightToolKit did not build

2010-01-01 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Jan 1, 2010, at 20:08, Frank J. R. Hanstick wrote: > It is not very encouraging that it took so long your system. I only have a > dual 1.73 GHz PowerPC G4 on a 133 MHz bus (I am assuming you have a dual core > intel with a faster bus) and 1 MB RAM. Disk space is not a problem (165 GB > av

Re: InsightToolKit did not build

2010-01-01 Thread Frank J. R. Hanstick
Hello, It is not very encouraging that it took so long your system. I only have a dual 1.73 GHz PowerPC G4 on a 133 MHz bus (I am assuming you have a dual core intel with a faster bus) and 1 MB RAM. Disk space is not a problem (165 GB available). This is the fourth time that I hit the sa

Re: InsightToolKit did not build

2010-01-01 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Jan 1, 2010, at 19:21, Frank J. R. Hanstick wrote: > Updated to MacPorts 1.8.2, upgraded all the installed ports, and then > tried to install insighttoolkit. Installation failed and I reran the > installation with debug enabled and got the following: I saw your previous message on th

Re: Which package to install if I want to have the man page for strdup?

2010-01-01 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Jan 1, 2010, at 19:03, Peng Yu wrote: > On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 5:56 PM, Joshua Root wrote: >> On 2010-1-2 10:40 , Peng Yu wrote: >>> I don't have manpage for strdup. Could somebody let me know which >>> package I should install? >> >> Man pages are generally installed by the same port as the

InsightToolKit did not build

2010-01-01 Thread Frank J. R. Hanstick
Hello, Updated to MacPorts 1.8.2, upgraded all the installed ports, and then tried to install insighttoolkit. Installation failed and I reran the installation with debug enabled and got the following: [ 17%] Built target itkvnl_inst /usr/bin/gnumake -f Code/Common/CMakeFiles/ITKCommon.dir/

Re: Which package to install if I want to have the man page for strdup?

2010-01-01 Thread Peng Yu
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 5:56 PM, Joshua Root wrote: > On 2010-1-2 10:40 , Peng Yu wrote: >> I don't have manpage for strdup. Could somebody let me know which >> package I should install? > > Man pages are generally installed by the same port as the software they > document, but of course we don't h

Re: Which package to install if I want to have the man page for strdup?

2010-01-01 Thread Bryan Blackburn
On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 10:56:33AM +1100, Joshua Root said: > On 2010-1-2 10:40 , Peng Yu wrote: > > I don't have manpage for strdup. Could somebody let me know which > > package I should install? > > Man pages are generally installed by the same port as the software they > document, but of course

Re: Which package to install if I want to have the man page for strdup?

2010-01-01 Thread Joshua Root
On 2010-1-2 10:40 , Peng Yu wrote: > I don't have manpage for strdup. Could somebody let me know which > package I should install? Man pages are generally installed by the same port as the software they document, but of course we don't have a libc port. Mac OS X ships with a strdup man page AFAICT

Re: Which package to install if I want to have the man page for strdup?

2010-01-01 Thread Brandon Allbery
On Jan 1, 2010, at 18:40 , Peng Yu wrote: I don't have manpage for strdup. Could somebody let me know which package I should install? strdup is part of the system C library. What you're missing is the UNIX manual pages part of the XCode distribution. -- brandon s. allbery [solaris,freebsd

Which package to install if I want to have the man page for strdup?

2010-01-01 Thread Peng Yu
I don't have manpage for strdup. Could somebody let me know which package I should install? ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users

Re: Pyraf question

2010-01-01 Thread David Nicholls
David Nicholls wrote: Joshua Root wrote: On 2010-1-2 01:00 , Joshua Root wrote: On 2010-1-2 00:24 , David Nicholls wrote: Some progress: the pre-install tests work, but I suspect the port install process is not going to let me configure: The error message I get is: sudo port install

Re: Pyraf question

2010-01-01 Thread David Nicholls
Joshua Root wrote: On 2010-1-2 01:00 , Joshua Root wrote: On 2010-1-2 00:24 , David Nicholls wrote: Some progress: the pre-install tests work, but I suspect the port install process is not going to let me configure: The error message I get is: sudo port install ---> Computing depend

Re: Successfully installed nmap but can't find zenmap

2010-01-01 Thread Kok-Yong Tan
On Jan 1, 2010, at 16:43, Joshua Root wrote: On 2010-1-2 08:32 , Kok-Yong Tan wrote: I've successfully installed nmap 5.0 using "sudo port -v install nmap". zenmap is supposed to be bundled with nmap and there seems to be a request on the MacPorts site that zenmap use a python version 2.5 b

Re: Gromacs compilation

2010-01-01 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Jan 1, 2010, at 14:44, Emiliano Ippoliti wrote: > by the current implementation of gromacs or gromacs-double Portfiles I was > not able to compile the program on Snow Leopard (Mac OS X 10.6.2). > > It was sufficient to add the string: > > --enable-apple-64bit > > in the "configure.args" fi

Re: Successfully installed nmap but can't find zenmap

2010-01-01 Thread Joshua Root
On 2010-1-2 08:32 , Kok-Yong Tan wrote: > I've successfully installed nmap 5.0 using "sudo port -v install nmap". > zenmap is supposed to be bundled with nmap and there seems to be a > request on the MacPorts site that zenmap use a python version 2.5 but I > can't find zenmap itself. I've tried "

Successfully installed nmap but can't find zenmap

2010-01-01 Thread Kok-Yong Tan
I've successfully installed nmap 5.0 using "sudo port -v install nmap". zenmap is supposed to be bundled with nmap and there seems to be a request on the MacPorts site that zenmap use a python version 2.5 but I can't find zenmap itself. I've tried "port search nmap" for references to zenm

Gromacs compilation

2010-01-01 Thread Emiliano Ippoliti
Dear Sirs, by the current implementation of gromacs or gromacs-double Portfiles I was not able to compile the program on Snow Leopard (Mac OS X 10.6.2). It was sufficient to add the string: --enable-apple-64bit in the "configure.args" field of the Portfile to successfully compile them. I gues

Re: Pyraf question

2010-01-01 Thread Joshua Root
On 2010-1-2 01:00 , Joshua Root wrote: > On 2010-1-2 00:24 , David Nicholls wrote: >> Some progress: the pre-install tests work, but I suspect the port >> install process is not going to let me configure: The error message I >> get is: >> >> >> sudo port install >> ---> Computing depende

Re: Pyraf question

2010-01-01 Thread Joshua Root
On 2010-1-2 00:24 , David Nicholls wrote: > Some progress: the pre-install tests work, but I suspect the port > install process is not going to let me configure: The error message I > get is: > > > sudo port install > ---> Computing dependencies for pyraf > ---> Configuring pyraf > Err

Re: Pyraf question

2010-01-01 Thread David Nicholls
David Nicholls wrote: Ryan Schmidt wrote: On Dec 31, 2009, at 23:43, David Nicholls wrote: I have prepared what I think might be a protfile, but since my ignorance is considerable, I don't know how correct it is. I don't know what to call it nor where to send it. Attached below. So I also lo

Re: Pyraf question

2010-01-01 Thread David Nicholls
Ryan Schmidt wrote: On Dec 31, 2009, at 23:43, David Nicholls wrote: I have prepared what I think might be a protfile, but since my ignorance is considerable, I don't know how correct it is. I don't know what to call it nor where to send it. Attached below. So I also logged a port request.

Re: Pyraf question

2010-01-01 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Dec 31, 2009, at 23:43, David Nicholls wrote: > I have prepared what I think might be a protfile, but since my ignorance is > considerable, I don't know how correct it is. I don't know what to call it > nor where to send it. Attached below. So I also logged a port request. Name the file "