Re: Call for PortMgr interest/nominations

2008-10-08 Thread Julio Biason
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 1:49 AM, James Berry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Per my previous note to Jordan, I'd like to set a deadline of this coming > Friday, Oct 10, for those wishing to be part of the new PortMgr slate. If > you are interested in these posts, please express your interest, or ask >

Re: upgrading gimp2

2008-10-08 Thread Adam Dershowitz
On Oct 8, 2008, at 3:48 PM, David Evans wrote: > David Evans wrote: >> Duc N Nguyen wrote: >> >>> I am trying to upgrade gimp2 with python scripting enabled. >>> However, >>> during the install ports is trying to install python24. Why is >>> that? >>> Shouldn't port know that I have python2

Re: upgrading gimp2

2008-10-08 Thread David Evans
David Evans wrote: > Duc N Nguyen wrote: > >> I am trying to upgrade gimp2 with python scripting enabled. However, >> during the install ports is trying to install python24. Why is that? >> Shouldn't port know that I have python25 already installed? >> >> I already have python25 installed and

Re: linking to libssl and libcrypt

2008-10-08 Thread Bryan Blackburn
On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 02:27:07PM -0700, Shawn Protsman said: [...] > Thanks for the quick reply. I copied the static lib to /usr/local/lib > and then tried to compile my binary which links to liballkeyrtv.a: > > Building target: keyreq > ##gcc -lallkeyrtv -o keyreq keyreq.o > gcc -o keyreq key

Re: macports and Xcode

2008-10-08 Thread Bryan Blackburn
On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 02:16:08PM -0700, rhubbell said: > Hello all, > > Probably a ridiculous question. (never stopped me before) > Is macports always and forever dependent upon Xcode? > Can it be de-coupled? > As long as MacPorts builds ports from source, then Xcode is an absolute requirement

Re: linking to libssl and libcrypt

2008-10-08 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Shawn Protsman wrote: > Undefined symbols: >"_inflateEnd", referenced from: >_zlib_stateful_free_ex_data in liballkeyrtv.a(c_zlib.o) >_bio_zlib_free in liballkeyrtv.a(c_zlib.o) >"_inflateInit_", referenced from: Need -lz. Peter -- Peter O'Gorman http://pogma.com ___

Re: linking to libssl and libcrypt

2008-10-08 Thread Shawn Protsman
On Oct 8, 2008, at 1:57 PM, Bryan Blackburn wrote: > On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 01:44:19PM -0700, Shawn Protsman said: >> I'm attempting to build a static library that links to both libssl.a >> and libcrypto.a. When I build it I get these "has no symbols" >> messages. Any advice on resolving this? Th

macports and Xcode

2008-10-08 Thread rhubbell
Hello all, Probably a ridiculous question. (never stopped me before) Is macports always and forever dependent upon Xcode? Can it be de-coupled? ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/lis

Re: upgrading gimp2

2008-10-08 Thread David Evans
Duc N Nguyen wrote: > I am trying to upgrade gimp2 with python scripting enabled. However, > during the install ports is trying to install python24. Why is that? > Shouldn't port know that I have python25 already installed? > > I already have python25 installed and don't want to install python24.

Re: linking to libssl and libcrypt

2008-10-08 Thread Bryan Blackburn
On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 01:44:19PM -0700, Shawn Protsman said: > I'm attempting to build a static library that links to both libssl.a > and libcrypto.a. When I build it I get these "has no symbols" > messages. Any advice on resolving this? Thanks. > Ignore them? Some source files end up, bas

upgrading gimp2

2008-10-08 Thread Duc N Nguyen
I am trying to upgrade gimp2 with python scripting enabled. However, during the install ports is trying to install python24. Why is that? Shouldn't port know that I have python25 already installed? I already have python25 installed and don't want to install python24. Is there a way to keep gimp2

linking to libssl and libcrypt

2008-10-08 Thread Shawn Protsman
I'm attempting to build a static library that links to both libssl.a and libcrypto.a. When I build it I get these "has no symbols" messages. Any advice on resolving this? Thanks. # Building liballkeyrtv.a libtool -static -o liballkeyrtv.a allkeyrtv.o parseini.o tksc.o TkscTls.o TkscSockets.o

Re: [macports-mgr] Hey, I would like to propose that we cut the gordian knot.

2008-10-08 Thread Mikel King
Greetings all, I am a relatively silent observer of this list, and well felt it worth chiming in. Since I am on the exec board of the BSD Cert Group, which has experienced more than their share of staled elections I happen to have a little experience with this sort of thing. I would

Re: There is no release manager! There is no release manager!

2008-10-08 Thread David Liontooth
Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > Ryan. I hate to do this to you, I really do, but given the degree to > which you've been active in this project and the fact that you clearly > know your way around, I don't suppose YOU would be willing to do this > for at least one release, just to get the ball ro

Re: Hey, I would like to propose that we cut the gordian knot.

2008-10-08 Thread C. Florian Ebeling
Well spoken, Jordan! On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 2:55 PM, Jordan K. Hubbard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gordian_knot) > Having just read jmpp's request for "a bit more time" to sort out a voting > process, I must confess to feeling more trepidation than assurance. To be

Call for PortMgr interest/nominations

2008-10-08 Thread James Berry
Per my previous note to Jordan, I'd like to set a deadline of this coming Friday, Oct 10, for those wishing to be part of the new PortMgr slate. If you are interested in these posts, please express your interest, or ask somebody to nominate you, by that time. In throwing in your hat, or acc

Re: [macports-mgr] Hey, I would like to propose that we cut the gordian knot.

2008-10-08 Thread James Berry
Hi Jordan, As usual, you work well to cut through the bureaucracy ;) I'm not so opposed to going along with your suggestion to just get this thing done, or that an official "vote" may be superflous. But I also think it's premature to assume that the list of nominees so far, is complete, g

Re: There is no release manager! There is no release manager!

2008-10-08 Thread paul beard
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 7:01 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > I don't know which reality you have been living in, but I think the > weight of evidence points to exactly the opposite conclusion: There > has not been a release manager or portmgr team for quite some time, > which is why this and o

Re: There is no release manager! There is no release manager!

2008-10-08 Thread paul beard
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 5:10 AM, Jordan K. Hubbard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Oct 7, 2008, at 9:35 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > For the next release, I think we need version 1.7.0, not 1.6.1, >> because there are countless new features and a year's worth of bug >> fixes. That much work deser

Hey, I would like to propose that we cut the gordian knot.

2008-10-08 Thread Jordan K. Hubbard
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gordian_knot) Having just read jmpp's request for "a bit more time" to sort out a voting process, I must confess to feeling more trepidation than assurance. To be completely fair, he does note several times that he and the rest of the moribund portmgr team wou

Re: There is no release manager! There is no release manager!

2008-10-08 Thread Jordan K. Hubbard
On Oct 7, 2008, at 9:35 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > For the next release, I think we need version 1.7.0, not 1.6.1, > because there are countless new features and a year's worth of bug > fixes. That much work deserves more than just a bugfix version number > increase. That means we release from tru

Re: There is no release manager! There is no release manager!

2008-10-08 Thread Jordan K. Hubbard
On Oct 7, 2008, at 7:36 PM, paul beard wrote: FAIL. There has been a release manager and portmgr@ team for quite some time and this bug lingers, festers even. I don't know which reality you have been living in, but I think the weight of evidence points to exactly the opposite conclusion:

Re: Important: MacPorts PortMgr Changes

2008-10-08 Thread Rainer Müller
C. Florian Ebeling wrote: >> In short, if we agree to the plan Markus, Juan and James >> proposed and open up the floor for nominations for PortMgr >> membership, I would be honored to accept your nomination. :-) > > Ok, then I hereby officially nominate you :) I wanted to do that > anyway. > > A

Re: Important: MacPorts PortMgr Changes

2008-10-08 Thread Rainer Müller
James Berry wrote: > So we want to propose some ideas to get new leadership blood into > MacPorts, while retaining the systemic knowledge and continuity that > our continued presence can allow. We therefore want to put the > following plan forward for community comment (and hopefully, > the

Re: Important: MacPorts PortMgr Changes

2008-10-08 Thread Juan Manuel Palacios
On Oct 8, 2008, at 3:10 AM, C. Florian Ebeling wrote: >> In short, if we agree to the plan Markus, Juan and James >> proposed and open up the floor for nominations for PortMgr >> membership, I would be honored to accept your nomination. :-) > > Ok, then I hereby officially nominate you :) I wante

Re: Important: MacPorts PortMgr Changes

2008-10-08 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Oct 8, 2008, at 02:40, C. Florian Ebeling wrote: >> In short, if we agree to the plan Markus, Juan and James >> proposed and open up the floor for nominations for PortMgr >> membership, I would be honored to accept your nomination. :-) > > Ok, then I hereby officially nominate you :) I wanted

Re: Important: MacPorts PortMgr Changes

2008-10-08 Thread C. Florian Ebeling
> In short, if we agree to the plan Markus, Juan and James > proposed and open up the floor for nominations for PortMgr > membership, I would be honored to accept your nomination. :-) Ok, then I hereby officially nominate you :) I wanted to do that anyway. Also I would like to nominate the follow

[Ticket #16549] gcc43: patch to add Ada support

2008-10-08 Thread Martin Krischik
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, The Trac Ticket #16549 [1] now open for 3 weeks and it seem to be stalled. And it seems that the ticket is stalled over the fundamental problem on how to handle self hosted systems [2]. Now I still would like to go ahead so I would like