Our "New ticket" form up at trac.macports.org had a ticket component
of "Infrastructure" to classify requests to our Mac OS Forge host on
hosting and server side functionality related issues. Such naming was
clearly not very understood and a lot of people have been filing
regular tickets
Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> On Dec 18, 2007, at 23:46, Joshua Root wrote:
>> The default should be to build 32-bit binaries on ppc64 machines, since
>> ppc64 code is generally slower. There should be a config file option so
>> those on ppc64 hardware can build everything 64-bit if they want. On
>> x86_64
I saw this problem as well even though the gawk port had been installed.
Running the install a second time worked.
On Dec 18, 2007 6:59 PM, Ryan Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Dec 18, 2007, at 20:30, Teck wrote:
>
> > I run:
> >
> > sudo port install php5 +macosx +mysql5 +apache2
> >
On Dec 18, 2007, at 23:46, Joshua Root wrote:
Ryan Schmidt wrote:
We could introduce a new automatic variant... +universal4?
+universal64? People could test with this new variant and if any
problems are encountered it would not prevent anyone from using the
existing 2-way 32-bit +universal va
Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> We could introduce a new automatic variant... +universal4?
> +universal64? People could test with this new variant and if any
> problems are encountered it would not prevent anyone from using the
> existing 2-way 32-bit +universal variant. I'm wary of this though...
>
FWIW, I managed to get around this problem by commenting out the
G_INLINE_FUNC declaration in SplitP.h and then reinstalling GnuCash.
So, line 152 of /opt/local/var/macports/build/
_opt_local_var_macports_sources_rsync
.macports.org_release_ports_gnome_gnucash/work/gnucash-2.2.1/src/
engine/
Please keep replies on the mailing list by using your mail program's
Reply All feature when you reply.
On Dec 18, 2007, at 10:27, Constant Dupuis wrote:
Hi Ryan,
I reply late because I was sick.
If I remember well I use the 'port install p5-perlmagick' command
after installing imagemagick
On Dec 18, 2007, at 20:30, Teck wrote:
I run:
sudo port install php5 +macosx +mysql5 +apache2
After serveral minutes, I got errors. The last output from the
console is:
hecking for mawk... (cached) no
checking for gawk... (cached) no
checking for nawk... (cached) no
checking for awk... (c
Hi
I run:
sudo port install php5 +macosx +mysql5 +apache2
After serveral minutes, I got errors. The last output from the console
is:
hecking for mawk... (cached) no
checking for gawk... (cached) no
checking for nawk... (cached) no
checking for awk... (cached) no
configure: error: No awk pro
I also got it done that way now. Just had to take care to save my
original installations (i.e. move them out of the way and later move
them back). Otherwise the installation starts to do a lot of
linking...whatever. Seems to work :). So now I have one 32 bit tree
and one 64bit. So far ok. J
On 2007-December-18 , at 21:58 , Daniel J. Luke wrote:
On Dec 18, 2007, at 3:55 PM, jiho wrote:
if you didn't build with --with-tclpackage set so that your two
installs have separate package directories, that could be causing
your problem.
Hi, could you elaborate a bit on that. I have the
On Dec 18, 2007, at 3:55 PM, jiho wrote:
if you didn't build with --with-tclpackage set so that your two
installs have separate package directories, that could be causing
your problem.
Hi, could you elaborate a bit on that. I have the exact same problem
with:
- two macport trees: /opt/loca
On 2007-December-18 , at 20:15 , Daniel J. Luke wrote:
On Dec 18, 2007, at 2:10 PM, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
On Dec 18, 2007, at 2:06 PM, Daniel Oberhoff wrote:
Hmm, so how does the port command actually know where it's tree
lives?
Is it hardcoded? Or does the installation put a tag somewhere
On Dec 18, 2007 12:08 PM, Charlse Darwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> $ sudo port install bing
> ---> Fetching bing
> ---> Attempting to fetch bing-1.0.5.tar.gz from http://
> www.freenix.org/reseau/
> ---> Attempting to fetch bing-1.0.5.tar.gz from http://
> svn.macports.org/repository/macport
$ sudo port install bing
---> Fetching bing
---> Attempting to fetch bing-1.0.5.tar.gz from http://
www.freenix.org/reseau/
---> Attempting to fetch bing-1.0.5.tar.gz from http://
svn.macports.org/repository/macports/distfiles/bing
---> Attempting to fetch bing-1.0.5.tar.gz from http://
svn
On Dec 18, 2007, at 2:10 PM, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
On Dec 18, 2007, at 2:06 PM, Daniel Oberhoff wrote:
The macoprt.conf files in /opt/local and and /opt/local64 only
reference /opt/local and /opt/local64 respectively, so this seems
correct.
did you also check to make sure you don't have a c
On Dec 18, 2007, at 2:06 PM, Daniel Oberhoff wrote:
The macoprt.conf files in /opt/local and and /opt/local64 only
reference /opt/local and /opt/local64 respectively, so this seems
correct.
did you also check to make sure you don't have a conf file in
~/.macports that could be over-riding
Hi Dan,
The macoprt.conf files in /opt/local and and /opt/local64 only
reference /opt/local and /opt/local64 respectively, so this seems
correct. Hmm, so how does the port command actually know where it's
tree lives? Is it hardcoded? Or does the installation put a tag
somewhere on the sys
It's working now! Thanks very much, Ryan!
-- LeAnne
Ryan Schmidt-24 wrote:
>
> Fixed the ticket. Wait 30 minutes, then "sudo port selfupdate", then
> hopefully it will work (assuming the jdom.org web site has come back
> online by then; I can't get to it right now).
>
--
View this messa
David,
On Dec 17, 2007, at 11:17 PM, David Evans wrote:
Would it be possible to remove dcraw from ufraw and have it depend on
the dcraw port instead or is there something
special about the version of dcraw bundled with ufraw? If so
perhaps it
could be renamed to avoid the conflict?
It shou
Fixed the ticket. Wait 30 minutes, then "sudo port selfupdate", then
hopefully it will work (assuming the jdom.org web site has come back
online by then; I can't get to it right now).
On Dec 17, 2007, at 15:02, lisfolks wrote:
I just found that there's a ticket open for this error: #13556
On Dec 17, 2007, at 14:52, Matrix Mole wrote:
I was just upgrading gtk2 to get it compiled against a package that
was
recently upgraded so I could remove the deactivated version of a port
(don't remember which port as it was upgraded during a port -dRu
outdated process). I noticed that gtk2 wa
Hi Ryan,
glad to hear that!
Thank you for the information.
On Dec 18, 2007 9:12 AM, Ryan Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> MacPorts 1.6 should still support Panther. I believe someone will be
> making a disk image soon. I don't know why the compile is failing for
> you.
>
>
> On Dec 17, 2007, a
23 matches
Mail list logo
