Re: Gimp install no longer stuck- sure is slow

2007-10-05 Thread Xin Liu
> You can always install gimp2 +without_gnome +no_python > > It will be somewhat faster to build, but you get no python scripts, > no svg support, no help viewer, no help files, no scanner support, no > print support, no macosx support, and even less. I'm curious: what is the "mac os x support"?

Re: Understanding the depends syntax

2007-10-05 Thread Adam Mercer
On 05/10/2007, Boey Maun Suang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > To fix this, set binpath in your macports.conf to include /usr/ > texbin, e.g.: > > binpath /opt/local/bin:/opt/local/sbin:/bin:/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/ > sbin:/usr/X11R6/bin:/usr/texbin Thanks Maun Suang, that's sorted it. > Just f

Re: Can't install gedit

2007-10-05 Thread Randall Wood
On 5 Oct 2007, at 18:24, William Davis wrote: btw in reference to gedit itself: From: Paolo Borelli To: GNOME Announce List , gedit list Subject: [gedit-list] gedit 2.20.0 released Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 14:28:27 +0200 gedit 2.20.0 has been released It is breaking on another issue whic

Re: Can't install gedit

2007-10-05 Thread William Davis
btw in reference to gedit itself: From: Paolo Borelli To: GNOME Announce List , gedit list Subject: [gedit-list] gedit 2.20.0 released Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 14:28:27 +0200 gedit 2.20.0 has been released gedit is the official text editor of the GNOME desktop. This is the first release of

Re: Gimp install no longer stuck- sure is slow

2007-10-05 Thread Yves de Champlain
Le 07-10-04 à 22:06, Boey Maun Suang a écrit : Hi Jeff, Is the gimp install supposed to take hours? Since MacPorts builds its packages from source by default, much depends on what's being installed and speed at which your machine can compile the software. In your case, the GTK graphics

Re: So many packages installed for gimp - amazed

2007-10-05 Thread Arno Hautala
On 2007/10/05, at 04:39, Ryan Schmidt wrote: Yup. The gimp port brings in a *lot* of dependencies. Here's the graph of everything that's going to be installed: http://ryandesign.com/tmp/gimp.png Alright, how did you do that and when is your next newsletter? --

Re: upgrading patchlevel

2007-10-05 Thread Boey Maun Suang
Hi Ara, http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core/browse_frm/thread/ 8fef3e23601c8237 post 14. Interesting; I just did a trial installation of the ruby-1.8.6- p110.tar.gz listed as the latest stable on the official download page, and "ruby --version" does report its patch level as 1

Re: Understanding the depends syntax

2007-10-05 Thread Boey Maun Suang
Hi Adam, I'm trying to install the gnuplot port and am running into an issue relating to TeX. The gnuplot port depends on "bin:tex:teTeX" which, if I understand this correctly, checks for a binary "tex" in the $PATH and if it can't find it installs the teTeX port. I have TeX installed with MacT

Understanding the depends syntax

2007-10-05 Thread Adam Mercer
Hi I'm trying to install the gnuplot port and am running into an issue relating to TeX. The gnuplot port depends on "bin:tex:teTeX" which, if I understand this correctly, checks for a binary "tex" in the $PATH and if it can't find it installs the teTeX port. I have TeX installed with MacTeX 2007:

Arrgh! Another error installing gimp!

2007-10-05 Thread Jeffrey Safire
Still trying to build gimp. ---> Building python25 with target all Error: Target org.macports.build returned: shell command " cd "/opt/ local/var/macports/build/ _opt_local_var_macports_sources_rsync.macports.org_release_ports_lang_py thon25/work/Python-2.5.1" && make all " returned error 2 C

Re: port -u upgrade outdated

2007-10-05 Thread Thomas De Contes
Le 5 oct. 07 à 05:14, Ryan Schmidt a écrit : On Oct 4, 2007, at 21:57, Thomas De Contes wrote: Le 5 oct. 07 à 00:22, Ryan Schmidt a écrit : On Oct 4, 2007, at 15:44, Emmanuel Hainry wrote: port -u upgrade anything is equvalent to port upgrade anything port uninstall inactive am I right ?

Re: installing a known tar.gz

2007-10-05 Thread ara.t.howard
On Oct 5, 2007, at 9:27 AM, Daniel J. Luke wrote: mkdir ruby cd ruby port cat ruby > Portfile vim Portfile port install ... should probably work for you. interesting. i'm thinking i should probably uninstall the normal ruby port first then right? kind regards. a @ http://codeforpeople.

Re: installing a known tar.gz

2007-10-05 Thread Daniel J. Luke
On Oct 5, 2007, at 11:21 AM, ara.t.howard wrote: i'm trying to compile the latest ruby (stable-snapshot.tar.gz) using the ports compiler toolchain. i though i might be able to do something like sudo cp stable-snapshot.tar.gz distfiles/ruby/ruby-1.8.6.tar.gz sudo port -p -f install ruby

installing a known tar.gz

2007-10-05 Thread ara.t.howard
hi all- i'm trying to compile the latest ruby (stable-snapshot.tar.gz) using the ports compiler toolchain. i though i might be able to do something like sudo cp stable-snapshot.tar.gz distfiles/ruby/ruby-1.8.6.tar.gz sudo port -p -f install ruby but no joy. that complained about the

Re: upgrading patchlevel

2007-10-05 Thread ara.t.howard
On Oct 5, 2007, at 1:34 AM, Boey Maun Suang wrote: I agree that the current ruby port is behind the latest one, but where does the 5000 patchlevel come from? The official download link [1] lists the latest stable tarball as ruby-1.8.6-p110.tar.gz, which I assume means patchlevel 110. T

Re: portupgrade

2007-10-05 Thread ara.t.howard
On Oct 4, 2007, at 11:14 PM, Erwan David wrote: I also doubt portupgrade will work with macports. But some features are interesting. An exemple is the fact that in upgrading it will order the recompilations thus avoiding recompiling 6 or 7 time the same library, as macports do. yeah i

cdrtools installs manpages to wrong place

2007-10-05 Thread Nick Guenther
Hi, I just did $ sudo port install cdrtools and near the end of the process got a message that it had installed manpages to /usr/share/man which violates the standards, and suggests that this should be fixed. -Nick ___ macports-users mailing list macpor

Re: portupgrade

2007-10-05 Thread Daniel J. Luke
On Oct 5, 2007, at 3:08 AM, Boey Maun Suang wrote: I also doubt portupgrade will work with macports. But some features are interesting. An exemple is the fact that in upgrading it will order the recompilations thus avoiding recompiling 6 or 7 time the same library, as macports do. This wo

Re: port -u upgrade outdated

2007-10-05 Thread Thomas De Contes
Le 5 oct. 07 à 09:04, Emmanuel Hainry a écrit : Citando Ryan Schmidt : On Oct 4, 2007, at 15:44, Emmanuel Hainry wrote: While there exist an outdated port, do let foo be an outdated port, 'port update foo' loop port -f uninstall inactive The way I proposed works, just try i

Re: Segfaults when staging into destroot

2007-10-05 Thread Dave Murray-Rust
On 4 Oct 2007, at 23:39, Ryan Schmidt wrote: On Oct 4, 2007, at 17:23, Dave Murray-Rust wrote: On 4 Oct 2007, at 23:01, Ryan Schmidt wrote: On Oct 4, 2007, at 04:29, Dave Murray-Rust wrote: On 1 Oct 2007, at 11:41, Dave Murray-Rust wrote: On 1 Oct 2007, at 10:51, Ryan Schmidt wrote:

Re: Cannot install 'gail' < libgnomecanvas < gnucash

2007-10-05 Thread Paul Henegan
Thank You! The installation is proceeding as expected ;) I have encountered a snag " ---> Fetching evince ---> Attempting to fetch evince-2.20.0.tar.bz2 from http:// mandril.creatis.insa-lyon.fr/linux/gnome.org/sources/evince/2.20/ ---> Verifying checksum(s) for evince ---> Extracting

Re: Cannot install 'gail' < libgnomecanvas < gnucash

2007-10-05 Thread Paul Henegan
On 5 Oct 2007, at 04:45, Ryan Schmidt wrote: On Oct 4, 2007, at 23:57, Paul Henegan wrote: While attempting to install gnucash, I have run into a dead end with one of its dependencies, libgnomecanvas. " $ sudo port -c install gnucash checking for LIBGNOMECANVAS... configure: error: Packag

Re: Can't install gedit

2007-10-05 Thread Randall Wood
Sorry about giving that erronious advice. Let's try this instead: 1) sudo port gst-plugins-good install 2) sudo port gnome-bindings-suite install 3) sudo port gnome-session install At this point you will have a minimum working GNOME (it will complain about missing parts, but you

Re: Cannot install 'gail' < libgnomecanvas < gnucash

2007-10-05 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Oct 4, 2007, at 23:57, Paul Henegan wrote: Hello Mac OS X 10.4.10, MBP 3,1 (mid-June 2007 model), X-Code 2.4.1, freshly installed and updated macsport. While attempting to install gnucash, I have run into a dead end with one of its dependencies, libgnomecanvas. " $ sudo port -c insta

Re: So many packages installed for gimp - amazed

2007-10-05 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Oct 5, 2007, at 02:06, Boey Maun Suang wrote: Hi Jeff, I understand that gimp has dependencies but I am amazed at how many packages are being installed. It is not just how slow my iBook G4 is, but all of the following have been installed in response to my install of gimp (run from a d

Re: upgrading patchlevel

2007-10-05 Thread Boey Maun Suang
On 05/10/2007, at 11:43, ara.t.howard wrote: my ruby 1.8.6 is at patchlevel 0 but the actual 1.8.6 is at 5000 I agree that the current ruby port is behind the latest one, but where does the 5000 patchlevel come from? The official download link [1] lists the latest stable tarball as ruby-

Re: portupgrade

2007-10-05 Thread Boey Maun Suang
I also doubt portupgrade will work with macports. But some features are interesting. An exemple is the fact that in upgrading it will order the recompilations thus avoiding recompiling 6 or 7 time the same library, as macports do. This would be pretty easy to implement in the MacPorts ba

Re: So many packages installed for gimp - amazed

2007-10-05 Thread Boey Maun Suang
Hi Jeff, I understand that gimp has dependencies but I am amazed at how many packages are being installed. It is not just how slow my iBook G4 is, but all of the following have been installed in response to my install of gimp (run from a different Terminal window while the port install c

Re: port -u upgrade outdated

2007-10-05 Thread Emmanuel Hainry
Citando Ryan Schmidt : > On Oct 4, 2007, at 15:44, Emmanuel Hainry wrote: > >> I must be misunderstanding what you want to achieve. I thought you >> wanted a script that updates all your outdated ports and does not >> leave inactive. In this case, there is no reason to use the -n flag : >> you want