Re: PATH in xterm

2007-05-30 Thread Altoine Barker
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 May I have a copy of your ~/.MacOSX/environment.plist? TIA - -Altoine Didier Arenzana wrote: > 2007/5/23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> "Didier Arenzana" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tuesday, May 22, 2007 at 3:25 >> PM -0800 wrote: >> >you can

[Fwd: GPG2, GPG-Agent, Enigmail, and Thunderbird2]

2007-05-30 Thread Altoine Barker
I solved the problem myself. I didn't change none of the settings in ~/.profile. I simply looked into the Error Console of Thunderbird (I never paid any attention to that before) and saw the following output: Error: [Exception... "'Failure' when calling method: [nsIEnigmail::initialize]" nsresul

Re: Open Source Mac - Free, Open-Source software for OS X

2007-05-30 Thread Walt Pawley
On 5/30/07 10:37 AM -0700, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: >On May 30, 2007, at 9:40 AM, paul beard wrote: > >>I'm getting a sense that people who use double-clickable >>installers are somehow not "our sort of people." Goodness >>knows we can always use more snobbery ;-) > >I wouldn't argue that at all.

GPG2, GPG-Agent, Enigmail, and Thunderbird2

2007-05-30 Thread Altoine Barker
Anyone find a way to get this port to work with Thunderbird? Let me outline my steps. First I port installed gpg2 and gpg-agent: sudo port -v install gnupg2 gpg-agent Next, I read the man pages for gpg-agent and do this to my ~/.profile: 000-400-132:~ altoine$ cat ~/.profile # # Your previous .p

Re: Open Source Mac - Free, Open-Source software for OS X

2007-05-30 Thread paul beard
On May 30, 2007, at 10:37 AM, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: I wouldn't argue that at all. I would instead argue that MacPorts is simply not READY to serve people who use double-clickable installers. That has always been a design goal of MacPorts, but it's not there yet. It has a ways to go.

Re: Open Source Mac - Free, Open-Source software for OS X

2007-05-30 Thread Jordan K. Hubbard
On May 30, 2007, at 9:40 AM, paul beard wrote: I'm getting a sense that people who use double-clickable installers are somehow not "our sort of people." Goodness knows we can always use more snobbery ;-) I wouldn't argue that at all. I would instead argue that MacPorts is simply not REA

Re: Open Source Mac - Free, Open-Source software for OS X

2007-05-30 Thread Andre-John Mas
On 30-May-07, at 12:40 , paul beard wrote: On May 30, 2007, at 8:35 AM, Andre-John Mas wrote: Given the target audience, and that these aren't pure unix solutions, I can't imagine how this would make their life easier. Different audiences, different solutions. I would be interested how you c

Re: Open Source Mac - Free, Open-Source software for OS X

2007-05-30 Thread paul beard
On May 30, 2007, at 8:35 AM, Andre-John Mas wrote: Given the target audience, and that these aren't pure unix solutions, I can't imagine how this would make their life easier. Different audiences, different solutions. I would be interested how you came to your conclusion. Um, these are open s

Re: Open Source Mac - Free, Open-Source software for OS X

2007-05-30 Thread Rainer Müller
paul beard wrote: >> http://www.opensourcemac.org/ >> >> How many of these are available through MacPorts? Might be worth >> letting them know that using MacPorts can make their audiences life >> easier. Most of them contain an auto-updater (Sparkle [1]) which conflicts with MacPorts. Imagine an

Re: Open Source Mac - Free, Open-Source software for OS X

2007-05-30 Thread Andre-John Mas
On 29-May-07, at 22:38 , paul beard wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 http://www.opensourcemac.org/ How many of these are available through MacPorts? Might be worth letting them know that using MacPorts can make their audiences life easier. Given the target audience,