Dear Vishnu,
Thank you very much for reaching to us.
Just one general remark since the deadlines are approaching very
quickly: a very important part of our GSOC selection process is to
prove to us that you can do a particular task. This may include some
pull requests, small demo prototype that yo
Here's a nice blog post about how to write a good GSOC proposal that
someone just sent to the mentors' mailing list:
https://medium.com/@owtf/google-summer-of-code-writing-a-good-proposal-141b1376f076
(We should prepare some similar good draft for our pages as well.)
Mojca
Dear Ryan,
I have no idea how to solve the issue with existing-possibly-broken
binaries (the problem with 10.5/PPC is that lots and lots of binaries
do not even build, so worrying about the few
built-but-new-to-be-broken binaries is not worrying me too much in
comparison). I admit it's a problem a
On 23 March 2018 at 10:28, Enrico Maria Crisostomo
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm working on fixing a `py-tensorflow` port issue
> (https://trac.macports.org/ticket/55972) and I've found the following problem
> when building `py-protobuf3`:
>
> ---> Building py36-protobuf3
> Error: Failed to
Hi,
I just stumbled upon this app (I haven't tested it yet) which might be
able to avoid some pain when editing git history before pushing your
changes upstream:
http://gitup.co
Mojca
Hi,
I'm compiling some command-line tools and I tried to aim supporting
10.6 (asking 10.6 users to grab libc++ from somewhere if they are
desperate enough to want to use the binaries).
I compiled against libc++ provided by MacPorts and asked a user to
test that binary on 10.7 (I would need to ins
On 23 March 2018 at 11:35, Enrico Maria Crisostomo wrote:
> On 23 Mar 2018, at 11:06, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>>
>> I would say this in an upstream issue that should be reported and
>> fixed. (That said, we could probably also have some code to
>> automatically fix t
I would like to propose introducing some "build-out-of-source"
variable that would work for any build system (CMake, meson,
configure, ...).
At the moment we do this semi-optionally for CMake, by default for
meson and don't explicitely support it for other build systems at all
(there might be exce
On 23 March 2018 at 15:59, Kenneth F. Cunningham wrote:
> On 2018-03-23, at 1:44 AM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>>
>> Additional question for Ken: if we do (b) and keep using gcc6(?), do
>> we then even need any special (buildbot) setup for C++11 builds like
>> we plan to d
On 23 March 2018 at 19:26, Rainer Müller wrote:
> On 2018-03-23 17:52, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>> I would like to propose introducing some "build-out-of-source"
>> variable that would work for any build system (CMake, meson,
>> configure, ...).
> For cma
On 24 March 2018 at 01:51, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> On Mar 23, 2018, at 15:47, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>
>> +PortGroup compiler_blacklist_versions 1.0
>
> The below doesn't blacklist compilers by version; it only blacklists them by
> name, so this portgroup isn&#x
On 24 March 2018 at 02:57, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> On Mar 23, 2018, at 05:35, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>
>> I'm compiling some command-line tools and I tried to aim supporting
>> 10.6 (asking 10.6 users to grab libc++ from somewhere if they are
>> desperate enough to want
On 24 March 2018 at 02:52, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> On Mar 23, 2018, at 15:10, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>
>> In the absence of any PortGroup implementing the build system, this
>> should make sure that autotools-based ports would properly build out
>> of source without chang
On 24 March 2018 at 11:52, Abhishek Kashyap wrote:
> Hi
> port news command will work after running selfupdate.
> I want to confirm that code will be implemented in proc action_selfupdate {
> action portlist opts } section.
> Please respond soon as deadline is near.
I'm sorry for not being able to
On 24 March 2018 at 14:49, Abhishek Kashyap wrote:
> How to draft a proposal ?
> I want to submit earlier for feedback and review.
Our template is here:
https://trac.macports.org/wiki/SummerOfCode#AboutUs
https://trac.macports.org/wiki/SummerOfCodeApplicationTemplate
Below are some tips and blo
On 24 March 2018 at 22:50, Vishnu wrote:
> Well that's really nice.
> I'll be emailing you the proposal very soon.
> I would really like to work on creating dynamic websites for each port with
> one framework.
> I think that is what you are also working on currently.Or is it something
> else?(Umesh
Hi,
Just so that you know: there is now two students inquiring about the
same project.
We cannot know in advance how good the proposals will be, but we
certainly cannot accept two students for the same project.
(That doesn't mean that you should grab a different project, but you
might or might no
On 24 March 2018 at 23:55, Vishnu wrote:
> Thanks Mojca for your prompt reply.
> 1) description, version,maintainer, homepage, variants,
> dependencies,dependent ports,etc
> So for information of each port, my website has to scrape data from such
> pages :
>
> https://github.com/macports/macports-p
Hi,
Please keep any technical discussion (that doesn't include
private/sensitive data) on the mailing list.
On 25 March 2018 at 00:42, Vishnu wrote:
>
> And regarding the individual port page.
> I was thinking whenever someone opens the port page.The content is generated
> at that time and displa
On 25 March 2018 at 00:42, Vishnu wrote:
> If i take up the project of improving the buildbot or the website.
> would it be considered a different project? Or we both still have to
> compete?
Both :)
> The other student could work on Option B and i could work on Option A
> Because those also soun
Hi,
(from
https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/pull/1429#issuecomment-375914819)
I just wanted to ask others about opinion about whether or not it
makes sense to keep maintaining multiple versions of django. I cannot
decide which option makes more sense as I don't have sufficient
experienc
Dear Vishnu,
On 25 March 2018 at 11:29, Vishnu wrote:
> Hi Mojca,
>
> I have submitted a draft proposal through GSOC portal.
> Please go through it and do review and suggest changes.
I'll try to provide a bit more feedback later, but just some quick points.
1.) Stretch goals are not asking you f
On 25 March 2018 at 18:49, Abhishek Kashyap wrote:
> Till now i have niether get any feedback nor any sugestion,
Organisations were announced on the 12th of February. I believe it is
somewhat unrealistic to expect from volunteer mentors from different
time zones to study your proposal and write su
On 26 March 2018 at 00:14, Rainer Müller wrote:
> On 2018-03-25 06:11, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>>
>> Currently PRs are tested by a separate build infrastructure on Travis. It
>> runs on three systems: Xcode 7.3 on OS X 10.11, Xcode 8.3 on macOS 10.12,
>> and Xcode 9.3beta on macOS 10.13. These builds
Dear Abhishek,
On 25 March 2018 at 22:22, Abhishek Kashyap wrote:
> I think it is not mandatory to submit a patch.
No, it is not mandatory as per GSOC general rules, but individual
organisations have their own criteria to select students.
Plenty of organisations simply ignore any application fro
Dear Vishnu,
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 2:58 AM, Vishnu wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I wanted some help in build bot summary.
> I am not sure i completely understand what's happening here.
> Could you please explain me about buildbot summary more?
>
> what i understand is :
> There can be n number of builds fo
On 26 March 2018 at 04:05, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> On Mar 25, 2018, at 19:54, Rainer Müller wrote:
>
>> This commit added gis/laszip/Portfile, but we already had
>> gis/LASzip/Portfile.
>> This causes a path clash and breaks working trees on case-insensitive
>> filesystems.
>>
>> I hope the solutio
On 26 March 2018 at 02:49, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> On Mar 25, 2018, at 14:37, David B. Evans wrote:
>
>> +# blacklist compilers that do not support C11 (redefinition of typedef
>> ‘GtkSourceTag’ at gtksourceview/gtksourcetag.h:35)
>> +compiler.blacklist *gcc* {clang < 300}
>
> Please be more specif
Hi,
I don't know if it's just me or if this is a general problem. The
following mirror is breaking installation of some perl modules for me:
https://mirror.transip.net/CPAN/modules/by-modules/
After deleting the mirror the installation proceeds just fine.
Mojca
On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 at 21:39, Joshua Root wrote:
>
> OK, so yes, it's giving a 200 response when asked for a file it doesn't
> have. I'll remove it.
Thank you,
Mojca
(Yes, it definitely returns "a valid HTML page" when asking for an
archive which is a problem on its own, but it's also not eve
701 - 730 of 730 matches
Mail list logo
