Re: +universal for x864+arm64 on Macintel

On Jun 10, 2022, at 11:23, René J.V. Bertin wrote: > When I tried to test the new +universal variant of a x864_64 + arm64 port > (port:VLC) installing from official DMGs on my 10.9.5 Mac I discovered that > the variant wasn't added because the port only supported the current build > architectur

Re: +universal for x864+arm64 on Macintel

I assume you have tried removing these two line from your portfile ? On 13/06/2022 8:48 am, Ryan Schmidt wrote: On Jun 10, 2022, at 11:23, René J.V. Bertin wrote: When I trie

Re: +universal for x864+arm64 on Macintel

On Jun 13, 2022, at 02:58, Chris Jones wrote: > I assume you have tried removing these two line from your portfile ? > > You're pointing to the `universal_variant no` line and t

Re: MacPorts Status

On Jun 11, 2022, at 09:07, Jordan wrote: > First of all thank you for your work! I use MacPorts exclusively for a few > different reasons and am looking to contribute to the project. I am starting > to spin up maintaining a few ports after a long break from macOS (mostly > because until M1 mach

Re: +universal for x864+arm64 on Macintel

On Monday June 13 2022 02:48:06 Ryan Schmidt wrote: > (and if MacPorts does not create a universal variant automatically in this > case then the port should do so itself) Doh, I should have thought about that. Still, it would be more elegant to handle that situation with something like `universa

Re: +universal for x864+arm64 on Macintel

On Jun 13, 2022, at 04:29, René J.V. Bertin wrote: > > On Monday June 13 2022 02:48:06 Ryan Schmidt wrote: >> (and if MacPorts does not create a universal variant automatically in this >> case then the port should do so itself) > > Doh, I should have thought about that. Still, it would be more e

Re: +universal for x864+arm64 on Macintel

Ryan Schmidt wrote on 20220613::04:34:46 re: "Re: +universal for x864+arm64 on Macintel" >As far as I know, the SDK would also need to support arm64, which SDKs prior >to macOS 11 don't. Therefore MacPorts doesn't support compiling for macOS for >arm64 prior to m

Re: +universal for x864+arm64 on Macintel

> On 13 Jun 2022, at 1:06 pm, René J.V. Bertin wrote: > > Ryan Schmidt wrote on 20220613::04:34:46 re: "Re: +universal for x864+arm64 > on Macintel" > >> As far as I know, the SDK would also need to support arm64, which SDKs prior >> to macOS 11 don&

Re: +universal for x864+arm64 on Macintel

> On 13 Jun 2022, at 1:06 pm, René J.V. Bertin wrote: > > Ryan Schmidt wrote on 20220613::04:34:46 re: "Re: +universal for x864+arm64 > on Macintel" > >> As far as I know, the SDK would also need to support arm64, which SDKs prior >> to macOS 11 don&

Re: +universal for x864+arm64 on Macintel

On Monday June 13 2022 21:40:19 Chris Jones wrote: I did indeed misread; I should have realised that 10.11 predates ARM Macs by too much. >Macports only supports buidling against the sdk you would ‘naturally’ get >installing the Xcode/CLT version supported on a given OS. Whilst it might be >p

Re: +universal for x864+arm64 on Macintel

On Jun 13, 2022, at 15:40, Chris Jones wrote: > On 13 Jun 2022, at 1:06 pm, René J.V. Bertin wrote: > >> Ryan Schmidt wrote on 20220613::04:34:46 re: "Re: +universal for x864+arm64 >> on Macintel" >> >>> As far as I know, the SDK would also need