Hi,
On 15/10/18 06:41, Joshua Root wrote:
I agree with the points in Mojca's first message in the thread.
On 2018-10-15 09:20 , Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 at 00:10, Blair Zajac wrote:
We could add a rule that should help a bit that openmaintainer only lets people
do minor ver
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 09:58:59AM +0100, Chris Jones wrote:
Hi,
On 15/10/18 06:41, Joshua Root wrote:
I agree with the points in Mojca's first message in the thread.
On 2018-10-15 09:20 , Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 at 00:10, Blair Zajac wrote:
We could add a rule that should
and so on... Do we have a guide for something like this written done
anywhere ?
"7.4.1. Non-Maintainer Port Updates" in our guide.
https://guide.macports.org/#project.update-policies.nonmaintainer
That is not what I am asking for. Specifically it does not give any
guidance on exactly what
On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 00:20:53 +0200 Mojca Miklavec
wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 at 00:10, Blair Zajac wrote:
> >
> > We could add a rule that should help a bit that openmaintainer
> > only lets people do minor version bumps, e.g. X.Y to X.(Y+1) and
> > X.Y.Z to X.Y.(Z+1). This doesn’t solve the Lua
Hi,
1. if the person doing the update is skilled (and at this point I
generally know the difference),
2. if they indicate that they've tested the result,
3. if it seems based on history that the listed maintainer is unlikely
to comment then or ever (and I usually guess right),
4. and that if wha
I'll second Chris' note of thanks for MP folks keeping the PR queue short.
Since MP folks (especially Perry) have started stepping up to this task, I too
have been trying harder to do my part.
Now my US$0.02 worth and all IMHO about PR commit timeouts & why. - MLD
-Any- non-urgent fix should go
My two cents:
I'm a committer, and if I'm doing a trivial bump of an openmaintainer
port I'll push it directly. If I'm opening a GitHub PR for an
openmaintainer port this means that for some reason I want the
maintainer's opinion/review before it gets merged.
As a maintainer, I would be anno
Hi,
> On 15 Oct 2018, at 10:34 pm, Leonardo Brondani Schenkel
> wrote:
>
> My two cents:
>
> I'm a committer, and if I'm doing a trivial bump of an openmaintainer port
> I'll push it directly.
Depends entirely on what you consider trivial. If you consider a version update
a trivial bump the
> On 15 Oct 2018, at 11:18 pm, Chris Jones wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> On 15 Oct 2018, at 10:34 pm, Leonardo Brondani Schenkel
>> wrote:
>>
>> My two cents:
>>
>> I'm a committer, and if I'm doing a trivial bump of an openmaintainer port
>> I'll push it directly.
>
> Depends entirely on what yo
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 02:16:48PM +0100, Chris Jones wrote:
Hi,
[...]
If these sorts of things aren't okay to merge pretty quickly, then
why do we have an openmaintainer designation at all? I mean, if
there's really no distinction in how you treat an openmaintainer and
a non-openmaintainer po
On 15 Oct 2018, at 11:18 pm, Chris Jones wrote:
On 15 Oct 2018, at 10:34 pm, Leonardo Brondani Schenkel wrote:
I'm a committer, and if I'm doing a trivial bump of an openmaintainer port I'll
push it directly.
Depends entirely on what you consider trivial. If you consider a version update
a
11 matches
Mail list logo
