At least changed http to https. It doesn't hurt to use the new official URL.
On 3/27/17 6:08 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
Doesn't look like this did anything useful. Both the old and the new URL
redirect to the GitHub release URL.
--
Best regards,
Zero King
Hi,
After a long time I tried cross-compiling a few things on 10.6, but
most attempts failed:
> clang-mp-3.4 -arch ppc test.c -o test
[OK]
> clang-mp-3.7 -arch i386 test.c -o test
[OK]
> clang-mp-3.7 -arch ppc test.c -o test
ld: warning: ignoring file
/opt/local/libexec/llvm-3.7/bin/../lib/cl
On 27 March 2017 at 17:14, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After a long time I tried cross-compiling a few things on 10.6, but
> most attempts failed:
>
>> clang-mp-3.4 -arch ppc test.c -o test
>
> [OK]
Plus another problem that I don't quite understand:
libtool: link: clang-mp-3.4 -Wimplicit -Wr
On 27 March 2017 at 17:39, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> On 27 March 2017 at 17:14, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> After a long time I tried cross-compiling a few things on 10.6, but
>> most attempts failed:
>>
>>> clang-mp-3.4 -arch ppc test.c -o test
>>
>> [OK]
>
> Plus another problem that I don't
> On Mar 27, 2017, at 08:14, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> After a long time I tried cross-compiling a few things on 10.6, but
> most attempts failed:
>
>> clang-mp-3.4 -arch ppc test.c -o test
>
> [OK]
IIRC, cfe just spawns llvm-gcc-4.2 when using -arch ppc in older versions. I
suspec
On 27 March 2017 at 22:26, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia wrote:
>> On Mar 27, 2017, at 08:14, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> After a long time I tried cross-compiling a few things on 10.6, but
>> most attempts failed:
>>
>>> clang-mp-3.4 -arch ppc test.c -o test
>>
>> [OK]
>
> IIRC, cfe just spa
It's been a few months since I went down this rabbit hole, but IIRC,
it worked a little better to build clang on ppc directly. 10.5 intel
fails to build PPC correctly due to the runtime library issues you
stumbled across. The highest i have been able to go is clang-3.6 on
ppc so far (building it on
On 2017-3-28 11:46 , Mojca Miklavec wrote:
ld: library not found for -lto_library
Looks like ld is interpreting "-lto_library" as -l with a library name
of "to_library". No LTO support I guess.
- Josh