Not a bug. I just followed what Ryan did and everything is working. Thanks.
Here’s the PR: https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/pull/7917
> On Aug 1, 2020, at 9:13 AM, Steven Smith wrote:
>
> I’m trying to update port clam-server to the new syntax, and am hitting the
> following issue.
I’m trying to update port clam-server to the new syntax, and am hitting the
following issue. As far as I can tell, it looks like a bug. The command `port
destroot clam-server` with Macports 2.6.3 fails with this error:
> ---> Creating launchd control script 'ClamavScanOnAccess'
> Error: Failed
On Jun 14, 2020, at 16:08, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> On Jun 14, 2020, at 11:45, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
>> Is this a bug?
>
> On the assumption that it is, I believe this is the fix:
>
> https://github.com/macports/macports-base/pull/191
The bug has been fixed in 2.6.3. Some ports will need to adjus
On 2020-6-15 03:04 , Steven Smith wrote:
> Could be a bug. Widespread practice is to code around it and edit the
> launchd .plist’s in the post-activate block.
If there's a bug, report it. It could have been fixed months ago and the
practice wouldn't have needed to become widespread.
- Josh
On Jun 14, 2020, at 11:45, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> Is this a bug?
On the assumption that it is, I believe this is the fix:
https://github.com/macports/macports-base/pull/191
On Jun 14, 2020, at 12:24, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> On Jun 14, 2020, at 12:18, Steven Smith wrote:
>
>>> If startupitem support in MacPorts base is not sufficient to express what
>>> we need, it should be enhanced.
>>
>> That’s a good objective. The current startupitems behavior annoyed me until
On Jun 14, 2020, at 12:18, Steven Smith wrote:
>> If startupitem support in MacPorts base is not sufficient to express what we
>> need, it should be enhanced.
>
> That’s a good objective. The current startupitems behavior annoyed me until I
> just learned to copy what others had done to code
> If startupitem support in MacPorts base is not sufficient to express what we
> need, it should be enhanced.
That’s a good objective. The current startupitems behavior annoyed me until I
just learned to copy what others had done to code around it.
I’d also note that doing a `man launchd.plist`
On Jun 14, 2020, at 12:04, Steven Smith wrote:
> Widespread practice is to code around it and edit the launchd .plist’s in the
> post-activate block. You can use tcl’s reinplace or sh’s plutil as necessary
> to edit the .plists.
>
> Example Portfiles that do this extensively:
>
> •
> https
