On May 10, 2018, at 19:44, Marcus Calhoun-Lopez wrote:
> On May 9, 2018, at 11:07 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
>> My understanding of the fact that they conflict is that there is some latest
>> version of Qt that is compatible with each version of macOS, and that by
>> using the qt5 portgroup, on
Sorry to chime in back so late, I had several hiccups with my mail lately, and
most (if not all) of your messages simply remained in transit until today.
As far as I have experimented, a single version of Qt is allowed to be
installed. Fair enough.
I’ve rewritten the Qgis3 port introducing a +q
I believe this is possible.
However, as Ken pointed out in a previous email, we have two models we could
follow:
1) The gtk3 +quarts vs gtk3 +x11 model
(Almost) every dependent port of gtk3 has quartz and x11 variants
consistent with whatever gtk3 was installed with.
I *think* this could
>> On May 9, 2018, at 5:00 PM, Craig Treleaven wrote:
>>
>>> On May 9, 2018, at 2:07 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On May 9, 2018, at 07:18, Craig Treleaven wrote:
>>>
On May 8, 2018, at 5:06 AM, Vincent Habchi wrote:
> I was in the process of modifying the Qt5 Port grou
> On May 10, 2018, at 5:44 PM, Marcus Calhoun-Lopez
> wrote:
> I am certainly open to suggestions to how to improve the situation.
>
The only thing that comes to mind is having qt ports be able select a qt
version variant that is mutually exclusive to the other qt versions, something
like
Your points are well taken, but I am afraid I do not have any good solutions.
It it helps, the dependencies on Qt components are of the path: variety.
The idea was that if you wanted to stay at Qt 5.9, you only had to install
qt59-qtbase.
However, this does not work well at all with prebuilt bina
> On May 9, 2018, at 11:07 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> My understanding of the fact that they conflict is that there is some latest
> version of Qt that is compatible with each version of macOS, and that by
> using the qt5 portgroup, one automatically receives that version. However, in
> prac
> On May 9, 2018, at 2:07 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
>
> On May 9, 2018, at 07:18, Craig Treleaven wrote:
>
>> On May 8, 2018, at 5:06 AM, Vincent Habchi wrote:
>>
>>> I was in the process of modifying the Qt5 Port group to allow for choosing
>>> the Qt version one wants to link an application
On May 9, 2018, at 07:18, Craig Treleaven wrote:
> On May 8, 2018, at 5:06 AM, Vincent Habchi wrote:
>
>> I was in the process of modifying the Qt5 Port group to allow for choosing
>> the Qt version one wants to link an application against using variants.
>> However, before I go further, I’d l
> On May 8, 2018, at 5:06 AM, Vincent Habchi wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> I was in the process of modifying the Qt5 Port group to allow for choosing
> the Qt version one wants to link an application against using variants.
> However, before I go further, I’d like to know if concurrent installation
10 matches
Mail list logo
