On 29 November 2016 at 02:21, Lawrence Velázquez wrote:
>> On Nov 28, 2016, at 7:31 PM, A. Karl Kornel wrote:
>>
>> I am looking for advice on how best to handle a port for a program
>> that wants to build its own language bindings.
>>
>> I am writing a port for a program called "hivex", which is a
> On Nov 28, 2016, at 7:31 PM, A. Karl Kornel wrote:
>
> I am looking for advice on how best to handle a port for a program
> that wants to build its own language bindings.
>
> I am writing a port for a program called "hivex", which is a tool and
> an API for manipulating Windows Registry "hive"
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 7:41 PM, Karl Kornel wrote:
> Yeah, I was thinking about variants, but then how best to things like
> Python, with its multiple versions? I could do one variant per version,
> but it would be nice if I could avoid that!
I have seen a number of ports that do exactly that
On Nov 28, 2016, at 4:32 PM, Brandon Allbery wrote:
>
>
>> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 7:31 PM, A. Karl Kornel wrote:
>> What makes this confusing is that additional language support is added by
>> `configure` switches (like --with-python and --without-ocaml), so I don't
>> think separate Portfil
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 7:31 PM, A. Karl Kornel wrote:
> What makes this confusing is that additional language support is added by
> `configure` switches (like --with-python and --without-ocaml), so I don't
> think separate Portfiles would be the best option here. I'm also not sure
> if subports
Hello!
I am looking for advice on how best to handle a port for a program that
wants to build its own language bindings.
I am writing a port for a program called "hivex", which is a tool and an
API for manipulating Windows Registry "hive" files. The API is written
in C, but it also is able
