On 2018-4-25 02:27 , Edward Maros wrote:
>
>
> On 4/24/18 8:45 AM, Joshua Root wrote:
>> On 2018-4-25 01:21 , Edward Maros wrote:
>>>
>>> On 4/24/18 8:15 AM, Joshua Root wrote:
On 2018-4-25 01:08 , Edward Maros wrote:
> I am working on splitting swig extensions out of a source package to
On 4/24/18 8:45 AM, Joshua Root wrote:
> On 2018-4-25 01:21 , Edward Maros wrote:
>>
>> On 4/24/18 8:15 AM, Joshua Root wrote:
>>> On 2018-4-25 01:08 , Edward Maros wrote:
I am working on splitting swig extensions out of a source package to
better facilitate building of language extensi
On 2018-4-25 01:21 , Edward Maros wrote:
>
>
> On 4/24/18 8:15 AM, Joshua Root wrote:
>> On 2018-4-25 01:08 , Edward Maros wrote:
>>> I am working on splitting swig extensions out of a source package to
>>> better facilitate building of language extension packages. Previously
>>> this was all don
On 4/24/18 8:15 AM, Joshua Root wrote:
> On 2018-4-25 01:08 , Edward Maros wrote:
>> I am working on splitting swig extensions out of a source package to
>> better facilitate building of language extension packages. Previously
>> this was all done in one Portfile with each language being a subpor
On 2018-4-25 01:08 , Edward Maros wrote:
> I am working on splitting swig extensions out of a source package to
> better facilitate building of language extension packages. Previously
> this was all done in one Portfile with each language being a subport of
> the main package.
>
> Is it possible t
I am working on splitting swig extensions out of a source package to
better facilitate building of language extension packages. Previously
this was all done in one Portfile with each language being a subport of
the main package.
Is it possible to have a Portfile which does not supply a main port,
