> On 5 Nov 2016, at 9:58 pm, Rainer Müller wrote:
>
>> On 2016-11-05 09:07, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>> # go to master and pull the latest changes
>> git checkout master
>> git pull --rebase
>>
>> # if you did your work on libpng in master, you are then set
>>
>> # else go to your libpng branch
On 2016-11-05 09:07, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> # go to master and pull the latest changes
> git checkout master
> git pull --rebase
>
> # if you did your work on libpng in master, you are then set
>
> # else go to your libpng branch and rebase the changes on top of the
> latest master
> git rebase
> On 5 Nov 2016, at 4:50 pm, Michael wrote:
>
> Keep in mind that there was one overall design goal of git: Whenever there
> was more than one right way to do something, do the opposite of svn.
>
> That is not a joke or exaggeration.
>
> Branches in git are dirt cheap -- they consist of crea
> On Nov 5, 2016, at 1:24 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
>
>> On Nov 5, 2016, at 3:07 AM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>>
>> On 5 November 2016 at 08:39, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>>> On Nov 4, 2016, at 12:39 AM, David Bariod wrote:
>>>
Personnally, I would just commit such change. It is cheap, can be re
