On 2018-11-28 10:00 , Randolph M. Fritz wrote:
> At some point, the license has to be shown and the question has to be
> asked.
Can you point us to where this requirement is stated? It's not part of
the standard BSD license.
- Josh
At some point, the license has to be shown and the question has to be
asked. Perhaps the way to do it is to have a separate small port that gets
license acceptance and store the result somewhere, and then have the main
portfile check for the acceptance.
--
Randolph M. Fritz || +1 206 659-8617 || r
On 26.11.18 03:26, Randolph M. Fritz wrote:
> No, you can download it. The license is an old BSD license, so it's
> pretty good, but users are required to read and accept it. Is there any
> way to accommodate this, or do I simply have to say that we can't
> distribute a portfile for the system?
Ev
On 2018-11-26 13:26 , Randolph M. Fritz wrote:
> No, you can download it. The license is an old BSD license, so it's
> pretty good, but users are required to read and accept it. Is there any
> way to accommodate this, or do I simply have to say that we can't
> distribute a portfile for the system?
No, you can download it. The license is an old BSD license, so it's pretty
good, but users are required to read and accept it. Is there any way to
accommodate this, or do I simply have to say that we can't distribute a
portfile for the system?
(Sorry for the double post, Ryan. Someday I will remem
On Nov 24, 2018, at 19:44, Randolph M. Fritz wrote:
> It's Radiance. It is hard to change, perhaps not possible at all. Is there
> any way MacPorts can accommodate this, perhaps as a source-only port?
>
> What do people think?
You are referring to a software project whose web site makes you
It's Radiance. It is hard to change, perhaps not possible at all. Is there
any way MacPorts can accommodate this, perhaps as a source-only port?
What do people think?
--
Randolph M. Fritz || rmfri...@gmail.com
