request review of PR27148

Hi, I'd like to request a review of PR27148 . It updates ansible and related python packages so that it can be used with python313. It's been in the queue without a review from any of the related port owners for a month with recent mods to k

Re: Request review of PR 26725 (p5-dbd-mysql)

st abandon the effort. Thanks, John On Fri, Dec 20, 2024 at 1:25 PM John Hoyt wrote: > Hi, > > I was tagged with fixing some p5-dbd-mysql issues in trac. Those fixes > are incorporated into PR 26725 > <https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/pull/26725> which has been

Request review of PR 26725 (p5-dbd-mysql)

Hi, I was tagged with fixing some p5-dbd-mysql issues in trac. Those fixes are incorporated into PR 26725 which has been ready to go and sitting in the queue for three weeks since resolving the last requested action. I humbly request that s

Re: mysql8: remove cmake flag from build using openssl portgroup

On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 8:03 PM Ryan Carsten Schmidt < ryandes...@macports.org> wrote: > > Changes to a phase's args or env vars need to happen within that phase > (e.g. in a pre- block) or (more usually) globally (not in any phase) to > take effect reliably. Thanks Ryan - I'll amend my current

Re: mysql8: remove cmake flag from build using openssl portgroup

As it turns out, if I move the configure.pre_args-delete command to post-patch it works. Not sure if this is the best place, but hey, it works On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 7:10 PM John Hoyt wrote: > Hi, > > I'm working with the mysql8 team to try to figure out why the ma

mysql8: remove cmake flag from build using openssl portgroup

Hi, I'm working with the mysql8 team to try to figure out why the macports build exclusively uses the copy and update mechanism for linking mysql8 to openssl / libcrypto. Internally, they build with a custom openssl library, but avoid the copy and update mechanism by setting the following two cma

request review of PR 22645 and PR 22643 (qt5/6 Vulkan)

Hi, I have two PRs that have been sitting in the PR queue for a few weeks that I would like to request a review on both. Both add Vulkan support to qt5/6. These two PRs are a long overdue "TODO's" marked in the qt5/6 portfiles as Vulkan support via moltenVK wasn't quite ready 2 years ago. I am

Re: qt 6.5.0 removes support for macOS 10.14 and macOS 10.15

his moving forward. Happy to have others review and make suggestions on qtwebengine as well. Thanks! John On Sat, Apr 8, 2023 at 7:56 AM John Hoyt wrote: > Marcus, > > I've managed to get the qt6 portfile close to being ready for 6.5.0. All > of the qt submodules compile locally

Re: qt 6.5.0 removes support for macOS 10.14 and macOS 10.15

y, but not sure if it's been wired to a commit message or PR request flag for macports.. Regards, John On Wed, Apr 5, 2023 at 7:19 PM John Hoyt wrote: > Marcus, > > I'd be very happy to collaborate with you on this! Also very happy to > have you become the port maintainer. &

Re: qt 6.5.0 removes support for macOS 10.14 and macOS 10.15

ailable to us, like > newer builds of the compilers which can be used instead of the Xcode > versions, that help us support a lot of ports on systems way older than > upstream for them officially support. > > > > cheers Chris > > > > On 05/04/2023 2:02 am, John Ho

Re: qt 6.5.0 removes support for macOS 10.14 and macOS 10.15

and see if I can provide some help… > > Best, > Renee > > On Apr 4, 2023, at 8:32 PM, John Hoyt wrote: > >  > I've started working on updating the qt6 port to qt 6.5.0 (see > https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/pull/18186). > > Qt 6.5.0 removed support for m

qt 6.5.0 removes support for macOS 10.14 and macOS 10.15

I've started working on updating the qt6 port to qt 6.5.0 (see https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/pull/18186). Qt 6.5.0 removed support for macOS 10.14 and 10.15, only supporting macOS 11 and newer whereas qt 6.2 supports macOS >= 10.14. Any suggestions on how to handle the deprecation of

Request review for PR 16649 - QT6: Update to 6.2.4, add qtcharts qtmultimedia qtshadertools

I'd like to request a review of PR 16649 . It's been ready to go for a little over a week now. Thanks! John

Re: Review of PR 12966 - qt-qtwebkit

PR and let the issues languish). I am certainly more than happy to make any corrections to the portfile and/or commit messages, but I need some guidance from the team as to what needs to be done. On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 8:11 AM John Hoyt wrote: > I'd like to request a review for PR12966 &

Review of PR 12966 - qt-qtwebkit

I'd like to request a review for PR12966 (qt5-qtwebkitI) which fixes the compile issues on Monterey (and closes track ticket 63877 ). I've tested the fix to work on both Arm/x86_64 on Monterey and x86_6