Yeah, this is a better idea, perhaps.
On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 10:13 AM Jason Liu wrote:
> Whoever updates the Portfile, can you make sure to preserve the old
> version(s) of netatalk using a versioned subport, i.e. 'netatalk3',
> 'netatalk2' (or whatever), so that old versions of macOS can still
Whoever updates the Portfile, can you make sure to preserve the old
version(s) of netatalk using a versioned subport, i.e. 'netatalk3',
'netatalk2' (or whatever), so that old versions of macOS can still use the
older netatalk packages? I think that the 'netatalk' port should be
whatever is the late
I had a port for netatalk 3 somewhere; as I recall, it needed some fixes
for the build. That was a while ago, I do not know what is the current
status.
Very much likely that netatalk 4 will be broken on older systems and
possibly less useful than earlier versions.
So yeah, I think it should be a se
The Netatalk package has seen some serious updates recently with a new team
working on it. I have made a couple efforts and getting a working port for the
4.x versions but meson build system is tripping me up. Also looking at
compatbility it seems like we would want a netatalk4 package vs just u
