Re: Xcode configuration woes

On Nov 10, 2018, at 02:53, Vincent Habchi wrote: > Ryan, > >> I don't know why Apple is doing this to us. This contradicts what we >> previously knew about how SDKs were meant to function. The SDKs are supposed >> to be the same as the system headers of a particular version. We may want to >>

Re: problems with MP version of gfortran

See https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/pull/2980 Chris > On 10 Nov 2018, at 7:13 pm, Christopher Jones > wrote: > > > >> On 10 Nov 2018, at 7:09 pm, Christopher Jones > > wrote: >> >> Hi, >>

Re: Xcode configuration woes

Ryan, > Unless you do have /usr/include on your system. Do you? For users who have > installed /usr/include using the hidden installer package, you might need to > have the port set configure.sdkroot to the path of the SDK, even when > MacPorts wouldn't otherwise have done so. Ok, I set config

Re: problems with MP version of gfortran

> On 10 Nov 2018, at 7:09 pm, Christopher Jones > wrote: > > Hi, > > cctools was updated recently, changing the default variants it was built > with. This caused issues with the gcc compilers, so those where rev-bumped > last week to adapt. > > The issue though is users on 10.2+ who had c

Re: problems with MP version of gfortran

Hi, cctools was updated recently, changing the default variants it was built with. This caused issues with the gcc compilers, so those where rev-bumped last week to adapt. The issue though is users on 10.2+ who had cctools installed would have done so with the xcode variant installed. The rec

Re: Xcode configuration woes

Ryan, > I don't know why Apple is doing this to us. This contradicts what we > previously knew about how SDKs were meant to function. The SDKs are supposed > to be the same as the system headers of a particular version. We may want to > file a bug report with Apple about this. Maybe then they w