On 16 Dec 2017, at 01:17, Andrew Fernandes wrote:
> Not having the docs is a minus, but supporting py3 is good, so… it’s a wash,
> really.
How about using pip with git?
Shouldn't reclaim use rleaves instead of unrequested? As of now I have to rerun
reclaim in order to remove unnecessary ports.
On 15 Dec 2017, at 15:41, Andrew Fernandes wrote:
> Not in the pypi dist!
That's great. I guess, I'll have to make my own or look somewhere else.
On 15 Dec 2017, at 05:25, Andrew Fernandes wrote:
> patched and committed in f5a44cbcb1
Weren't there also man pages?
On 2017-11-6 12:45 , Rainer Müller wrote:
> On 11/05/2017 07:36 AM, Joshua Root wrote:
>> On 2017-11-5 16:47 , Eitan Adler wrote:
>>> On 1 March 2017 at 03:34, Rainer Müller wrote:
Sorry, I missed this earlier in the pull request [1], but I would be fine
with just changing the definition
