Re: State of the GnuPG ports

2017-09-09 Thread Jann Röder
I also agree with what you wrote. The three ports - gnupg-legacy (possibly call this gnupg14 - since this is unlikely to change) - gnupg-stable - gnupg-current should all conflict with each other. I'm in favour of keeping version numbers out of port names because if upstream iterate quickly you'

Re: [GSoC] migration

2017-09-09 Thread Bradley Giesbrecht
> On Sep 8, 2017, at 5:04 PM, Umesh Singla wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 3:40 AM, Rainer Müller wrote: > On 2017-09-08 23:33, Umesh Singla wrote: > > When I run the `migrate` action with only one port (expat) installed, I > > get the following: > > > > $ sudo ./bin/port migrate > > > > Takin

Re: Change and request

2017-09-09 Thread Frank Schima
> On Sep 9, 2017, at 9:19 AM, Rainer Müller wrote: > > On 2017-09-07 22:25, Wahlstedt Jyrki wrote: >> Dear all, >> as many of you have already seen, I’ve dropped nearly all of my >> maintainerships. I’ve been involved in this community over ten years, >> and now I feel I want to do some things p

Re: Change and request

2017-09-09 Thread Rainer Müller
On 2017-09-07 22:25, Wahlstedt Jyrki wrote: > Dear all, > as many of you have already seen, I’ve dropped nearly all of my > maintainerships. I’ve been involved in this community over ten years, > and now I feel I want to do some things preventing me from the > commitment to do this anymore on a con

Re: Server issues?

2017-09-09 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Sep 8, 2017, at 17:50, Rainer Müller wrote: > On 2017-09-08 18:48, Daniel J. Luke wrote: >> One solution might be to separate the build/distfile mirroring from the >> portfile mirroring. You could probably even do that by running separate >> rsync's for those on your home connection and doing

Re: [MacPorts] #54766: Does port:clang*'s libstdcxx have to be default?

2017-09-09 Thread René J . V . Bertin
On Friday September 08 2017 21:06:35 Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia wrote: > The reason for this is that many OSS projects based on autoconf, cmake, etc > have an assumption baked into the build system that the SDK matches the > minimum level of support. Well, I think that *is* the easier/safer as