On Mar 31 02:07:15, rai...@macports.org wrote:
> On 2017-03-30 23:44, Jan Stary wrote:
> > On Mar 30 21:06:59, rai...@macports.org wrote:
> >> On 03/30/2017 06:18 PM, Jan Stary wrote:
> >>> This is 2.4.99 from git running on 10.6.8.
> >>> The 'port search' recognizes '--maintainer' and '--maintaine
On 2017-03-30 23:44, Jan Stary wrote:
> On Mar 30 21:06:59, rai...@macports.org wrote:
>> On 03/30/2017 06:18 PM, Jan Stary wrote:
>>> This is 2.4.99 from git running on 10.6.8.
>>> The 'port search' recognizes '--maintainer' and '--maintainers',
>>> but the guide says '--maintainer' and '--maintai
On 03/31/2017 12:08 AM, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
> Would the buildbots upload the tarballs to the MacPorts mirrors?
Yes, that is the idea. It will not even require anything special on the
buildbots, as just running the usual 'sudo port fetch' will generate this
tarball after fetching from VCS.
R
> On Mar 30, 2017, at 12:13 PM, Clemens Lang wrote:
>
> Hey everybody,
>
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 01:37:55PM -0700, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
>>> On Mar 28, 2017, at 11:55 AM, Umesh Singla wrote:
>>
>> Does the migrate and snapshot actions help you divide the work? The
>> snapshot action is b
Regards,
Bradley Giesbrecht (pixilla)
> On Mar 30, 2017, at 12:32 PM, Rainer Müller wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On 03/30/2017 04:04 PM, Chinmaya Bhat wrote:
>> I am Chinmaya, a third-year Computer Science student at BMSIT, Bangalore. I
>> am
>> new to MacPorts. I can code in C and Python and am
On Mar 30 21:06:59, rai...@macports.org wrote:
> On 03/30/2017 06:18 PM, Jan Stary wrote:
> > This is 2.4.99 from git running on 10.6.8.
> > The 'port search' recognizes '--maintainer' and '--maintainers',
> > but the guide says '--maintainer' and '--maintainer'
> > while port-search.1 only says '-
On Mar 31 04:49:02, j...@macports.org wrote:
> On 2017-3-31 03:41 , Jan Stary wrote:
> > This is 2.4.99 running on 10.6.8
> >
> > port -d livecheck mandoc does not find
> > http://mdocml.bsd.lv/snapshots/mdocml-1.14.1.tar.gz
> > because it looks for "mandoc-(\d+(?:\.\d+)*)"
> > i.e. the tarball di
Hi cal, ijackson
Thanks for reviewing my proposal and providing a great feedback. I've
replied to most of your comments in the proposal. This surely helps. Please
let me know if I have made some false assumption about anything, the
timeline/ project plan needs to be modified a great bit or I haven
On Mar 30 21:47:38, rai...@macports.org wrote:
> On 03/30/2017 09:26 PM, Jan Stary wrote:
> > Just forget it. My intentions when proposing the mdoc(7) rewrite
> > were the opposite of having asciidoc and docbook and xml/xsl ...
>
> While the dependencies seem quite heavy,
(to say the least)
> la
On 03/30/2017 09:26 PM, Jan Stary wrote:
> Just forget it. My intentions when proposing the mdoc(7) rewrite
> were the opposite of having asciidoc and docbook and xml/xsl ...
While the dependencies seem quite heavy, languages like man(7)/mdoc(7) just fell
out of fashion and rarely anyone still und
Hello,
On 03/30/2017 04:04 PM, Chinmaya Bhat wrote:
> I am Chinmaya, a third-year Computer Science student at BMSIT, Bangalore. I am
> new to MacPorts. I can code in C and Python and am going through the Tcl
> tutorial on the GSOC wiki.
> I have installed MacPorts and am reading the documentation
On Mar 30 19:08:44, h...@stare.cz wrote:
> I propose to rewrite them into the _semantic_ markup of mdoc(7) language.
On Mar 30 20:59:31, rai...@macports.org wrote:
> Our man pages are actually written in AsciiDoc and then converted to the roff
> output. We only maintain the generated roff output i
Hey,
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 07:08:44PM +0200, Jan Stary wrote:
> Currently, the port-* manpages are written using the legacy man(7)
> language which uses low-level roff constructs to described
> presentational details.
>
> I propose to rewrite them into the _semantic_ markup of mdoc(7)
> languag
Hey everybody,
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 01:37:55PM -0700, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
> > On Mar 28, 2017, at 11:55 AM, Umesh Singla wrote:
>
> Does the migrate and snapshot actions help you divide the work? The
> snapshot action is basically an inventory of what is installed along
> with meta data
[sending again with correct list address]
On 03/30/2017 06:18 PM, Jan Stary wrote:
> This is 2.4.99 from git running on 10.6.8.
> The 'port search' recognizes '--maintainer' and '--maintainers',
> but the guide says '--maintainer' and '--maintainer'
> while port-search.1 only says '--maintainer'.
On 03/30/2017 07:08 PM, Jan Stary wrote:
> Currently, the port-* manpages are written
> using the legacy man(7) language which uses
> low-level roff constructs to described presentational details.
>
> I propose to rewrite them into the _semantic_ markup of mdoc(7) language.
> Both have been around
On 2017-3-31 05:10 , Jan Stary wrote:
On Mar 30 18:41:26, h...@stare.cz wrote:
This is 2.4.99 running on 10.6.8
port -d livecheck mandoc does not find
http://mdocml.bsd.lv/snapshots/mdocml-1.14.1.tar.gz
because it looks for "mandoc-(\d+(?:\.\d+)*)"
i.e. the tarball differs from the port name.
W
On Mar 30 18:41:26, h...@stare.cz wrote:
> This is 2.4.99 running on 10.6.8
>
> port -d livecheck mandoc does not find
> http://mdocml.bsd.lv/snapshots/mdocml-1.14.1.tar.gz
> because it looks for "mandoc-(\d+(?:\.\d+)*)"
> i.e. the tarball differs from the port name.
> What is the right place to s
Err, the intended subject was "manpages in mdoc(7)" :-)
But yes, manpages is mdoc(7), imho.
On Mar 30 19:08:44, h...@stare.cz wrote:
> Currently, the port-* manpages are written
> using the legacy man(7) language which uses
> low-level roff constructs to described presentational details.
>
> I pr
On 2017-3-31 03:41 , Jan Stary wrote:
This is 2.4.99 running on 10.6.8
port -d livecheck mandoc does not find
http://mdocml.bsd.lv/snapshots/mdocml-1.14.1.tar.gz
because it looks for "mandoc-(\d+(?:\.\d+)*)"
i.e. the tarball differs from the port name.
What is the right place to specify the righ
On 2017-3-31 03:18 , Jan Stary wrote:
Why are the generated *.txt files in the repository?
The .txt files are not generated; they are in asciidoc format and the
other versions are generated from them.
- Josh
Currently, the port-* manpages are written
using the legacy man(7) language which uses
low-level roff constructs to described presentational details.
I propose to rewrite them into the _semantic_ markup of mdoc(7) language.
Both have been around for decades and are well supported by groff.
As an
(Sorry, attaching now).
On Mar 30 18:18:41, h...@stare.cz wrote:
> This is 2.4.99 from git running on 10.6.8.
> The 'port search' recognizes '--maintainer' and '--maintainers',
> but the guide says '--maintainer' and '--maintainer'
> while port-search.1 only says '--maintainer'.
> Attached please
This is 2.4.99 running on 10.6.8
port -d livecheck mandoc does not find
http://mdocml.bsd.lv/snapshots/mdocml-1.14.1.tar.gz
because it looks for "mandoc-(\d+(?:\.\d+)*)"
i.e. the tarball differs from the port name.
What is the right place to specify the right regex?
Jan
This is 2.4.99 from git running on 10.6.8.
The 'port search' recognizes '--maintainer' and '--maintainers',
but the guide says '--maintainer' and '--maintainer'
while port-search.1 only says '--maintainer'.
Attached please find a diff for each.
There is also port-search.1.txt in git, which gets ou
Hi all,
As you might know summer is just around the corner and once again it's
time for summer of code. MacPorts is participating this year in google
summer of code.
We have been getting proposal requests from interested students. I
would like to request developers to reply to this mail if they a
Hi,
I am Chinmaya, a third-year Computer Science student at BMSIT, Bangalore. I
am new to MacPorts. I can code in C and Python and am going through the Tcl
tutorial on the GSOC wiki.
I have installed MacPorts and am reading the documentation provided.
I'm interested in implementing the task "Impro
27 matches
Mail list logo
