Hi,
I need to use "rpcgen -M" for one particular package that I'm trying to create.
But that flag is apparently missing on the binary that's bundled on
macOS, so apparently I need to create a package for rcpgen as well.
See:
https://trac.macports.org/ticket/47801
https://lists.apple.com/
On 1 February 2017 at 20:33, Marcus Calhoun-Lopez wrote:
>
>> Something that's not entirely clear to me yet is what's the benefit of
>> having clang compile software against gcc's libstdc++ vs. gcc6
>> compiling it.
>
> I have attempted to build both Qt and Octave with gcc6, and I have run across
On 1 February 2017 at 20:33, Marcus Calhoun-Lopez wrote:
>
>> And we should finally address binary builds for libc++. That would
>> likely solve 99.9% of our C++11-related problems.
>
> Unfortunately, I do not even know where to begin to solve this problem.
It's mostly about deciding what to do wi
> Something that's not entirely clear to me yet is what's the benefit of
> having clang compile software against gcc's libstdc++ vs. gcc6
> compiling it.
I have attempted to build both Qt and Octave with gcc6, and I have run across a
few unpleasant incompatibilities.
Example:
#include
>what's the benefit of having clang compile software against gcc's libstdc++
>vs. gcc6
compiling it.
The only benefit is that clang handles objc and macos SDK-heavy ports
when gcc6 will not.
>And what's the relation of all this to the magic
-D_GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI=0 flag.
This flag lets libgcc
On 1 February 2017 at 16:20, Marcus Calhoun-Lopez wrote:
> Yes, we are talking about the libstdc++ that is shipped with gcc6.
OK.
Something that's not entirely clear to me yet is what's the benefit of
having clang compile software against gcc's libstdc++ vs. gcc6
compiling it.
And what's the rel
Yes, we are talking about the libstdc++ that is shipped with gcc6.
I should have made clear that a major downside of choice #2 is that it requires
a library dependency on gcc6.
That is something that most (the vast majority of?) users will not want.
So perhaps choice #3 or choice #2 with the defa
It is hard to argue with your position.
For my own personal work, I have no need of my own proposals.
My main motivation has been to support Qt and GNU Octave on the widest possible
set of systems (and close a couple of tickets).
I am hoping that the proposals will cause minimal disruption at leas
On 2017-01-23 07:03, Jackson Isaac wrote:
> Google is accepting applications from projects. Would like to know if
> MacPorts would be participating this year ? Looking forward for an
> awesome Summer.
We skipped last year because we felt like we had too much stuff lying
around that was not integra
