Josh-
Thank you for your reply. I think I may not have been clear in what I'm
doing, so let me try to clarify in case it changes the answer. The config
files I'm dealing with arenot a configuration file for a port, it's
configuration files *provided by* a port, for use by the system.
Specifically,
On Thursday January 26 2017 23:58:40 Rainer Müller wrote:
> So, there are about 100 lines before lots of subports {} are defined.
> Why can't these be moved to a PortGroup
They could, but that's not code that has any business being made available to
every port out there.
Of course that would cha
On 2017-01-26 12:33, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> The only real obstacle is the fact that only a single file,
> "Portfile" is copied into the registry, but a quick look suggests
> that could be solved by loading delegate Portfiles through a `proc
> PortFile` (clone of the PortGroup proc) that sets Por
On 2017-01-26 23:12, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> On Thursday January 26 2017 21:56:59 Rainer Müller wrote:
>> Looking at the VLC port it looks like the subport ffmpeg-VLC and
>> the main port have nothing in common at all.
>
> You're not wrong but that's not entirely true either, the subport
> build
On Thursday January 26 2017 15:18:40 Brandon Allbery wrote:
> The complication is that, on installing, the Portfile (and, with this
> change, any inclusions) gets saved in the registry so that its uninstall
Yes, currently that's only the Portfile, and that happens in portinstall.tcl .
A bit furt
> On Jan 25, 2017, at 16:46, Zero King wrote:
>
> tobypeterson pushed a commit to branch master
> in repository macports-ports.
>
>
> https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/commit/8ece104001dabd2c92e633d74963c72c0fe8cb28
>
> The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this
On 2017-01-26 21:13, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> To stick with the ffmpeg-VLC example: it started as a complete copy
> of the 2.8.6 port:ffmpeg. Even trimmed down it's still taking up a
> lot of place inside VLC's Portfile, yet is still supposed to be a
> subport of and for the private use of VLC. It
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 3:13 PM, René J.V. Bertin
wrote:
> On Thursday January 26 2017 13:59:36 Brandon Allbery wrote:
> > It got tossed around on IRC around a year and a half ago; the conclusion
> > was that it was a lot of complication for very little gain.
>
> A lot more complicated than a pro
On Thursday January 26 2017 12:56:51 Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> I don't think anyone's ever suggested before that include files would be
> beneficial for portfile development, except for portgroups which are already
> handled.
PortGroups are exactly that (IMHO), include files, and they're very usefu
On Jan 26, 2017, at 09:03, Kurt Hindenburg wrote:
>
> Kurt Hindenburg (kurthindenburg) pushed a commit to branch master
> in repository macports-ports.
>
>
> https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/commit/31df8bb6a24ffa67515c5e07d20e185c73b1f855
>
> The following commit(s) were added to ref
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Ryan Schmidt
wrote:
> I don't think anyone's ever suggested before that include files would be
> beneficial for portfile development, except for portgroups which are
> already handled.
>
It got tossed around on IRC around a year and a half ago; the conclusion
was
> On Jan 26, 2017, at 05:33, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> In the past I've simplified the development of complex Portfiles by splitting
> them over at least 2 Portfiles, loaded with Tcl's `source` command. The
> latest example would be the ffmpeg-VLC subport
>
> I think the mainten
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 26.01.17 17:11 Daniel J. Luke wrote:
> The next step I would take would be to turn up postfix debug
> logging and see if you get a hint on what is going wrong.
OK, so it seems this is nothing macports-and-OSX-macos related. I'll
try to debug.
Th
On Jan 26, 2017, at 2:11 AM, Johannes Kastl wrote:
> On 25.01.17 22:28 Daniel J. Luke wrote:
>> What does `openssl s_client -connect 78.46.5.205:25 -starttls
>> smtp` > say?
>
> "verify return: 1" sounds like problems, but "Verify return code: 0
> (ok)" at the end sounds ok.
The next step I woul
On 2017-01-25 17:49, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
> On Jan 25, 2017, at 9:41 AM, Rainer Müller wrote:
>> Before being handed off to mailman, postfix already adds an
>> Approved header with the corresponding list post password to the mail.
>> This is apparently not enough to circumvent/pass the spam filte
On 2017-01-26 02:40, Joshua Root wrote:
> On 2017-1-26 01:41 , Rainer Müller wrote:
>> Your message was held for moderation because SpamAssassin gave the
>> message a score of 6.2 for the following reasons:
>>
>> HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, HEADER_SPAM, HTML_MESSAGE,
>> HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG, MI
Hello,
In the past I've simplified the development of complex Portfiles by splitting
them over at least 2 Portfiles, loaded with Tcl's `source` command. The latest
example would be the ffmpeg-VLC subport
I think the maintenance of quite a few of the more complex ports with multiple
subports co
17 matches
Mail list logo
