Re: Question about bootstrapping MinGW

2016-12-08 Thread Brandon Allbery
On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 4:10 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > Also, in an ideal world the package manager would check whether > "*-all" is already installed or available in a binary form and only if > it is not, it would start building the "*-gcc" port. > Specify it as a build dependency? -- brandon

Re: Question about bootstrapping MinGW

2016-12-08 Thread Mojca Miklavec
Hi, Here's the forgotten link: https://github.com/mojca/macports-user-mojca/tree/master/ports/cross On 7 December 2016 at 22:02, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > > I have finally managed to come up with ports for MinGW-w64. It seems > to work as expected except for a tiny problem: gcc has to be compil

Re: declaring variants/subports in loops and loop variables

2016-12-08 Thread Gustaf Neumann
Am 07.12.16 um 18:04 schrieb Joshua Root: This is almost exactly the same situation as: foreach foo {bar baz} { proc p_$foo {} { puts $foo } } p_bar p_baz you probably want the variable "foo" being substituted in the body of the dynamically defined procs: % foreach foo {bar

Re: declaring variants/subports in loops and loop variables

2016-12-08 Thread René J . V . Bertin
On Thursday December 8 2016 12:54:05 Joshua Root wrote: >> doesn't really help (me). ... >Changing that to this will solve the problem: Indeed, but not what I meant to say. >No, my intention was to show that the variable is not in the correct >scope. Adding a global declaration would still ill