> On Dec 4, 2016, at 6:25 PM, Lawrence Velázquez wrote:
>
>> On Dec 4, 2016, at 12:11 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>>
>>> On Dec 4, 2016, at 10:49, Lawrence Velázquez wrote:
>>>
>>> The checking script only mentions BSD (3-clause) and BSD-old
>>> (4-clause).
>>
>> As far as I was aware, we were
> On Dec 4, 2016, at 12:11 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
>> On Dec 4, 2016, at 10:49, Lawrence Velázquez wrote:
>>
>> The checking script only mentions BSD (3-clause) and BSD-old
>> (4-clause).
>
> As far as I was aware, we were referring to all three versions of the
> BSD licensee as "BSD". Is th
On Dec 4, 2016, at 10:49, Lawrence Velázquez wrote:
>
> The checking script only mentions BSD (3-clause) and BSD-old (4-clause).
As far as I was aware, we were referring to all three versions of the BSD
licensee as "BSD". Is there a reason to do otherwise?
The checking script only mentions BSD (3-clause) and BSD-old (4-clause).
vq
On 2016-11-30 18:55, Kevin J. Duling wrote:
> I'm requesting a review and/or commit for this ticket. It's not
> received an update for 5 weeks.
>
> https://trac.macports.org/ticket/52730
Is any of our Java port maintainers available to review this submission?
It would be nice to get some input,
