Re: [macports-ports] 03/03: lbdb: Update to 0.42

2016-11-10 Thread Lawrence Velázquez
> On Nov 10, 2016, at 9:57 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > >> On Nov 10, 2016, at 8:55 AM, Rainer Müller wrote: >> >> "Resolves" is not a keyword recognized by the CommitTicketUpdater, >> use "Closes", "Fix", or "Fixes". > > Can't remember what it supports. > > It should recognize "Resolves"; we've

Re: GitHub migration complete

2016-11-10 Thread Mojca Miklavec
On 10 November 2016 at 10:43, René J.V. Bertin wrote: > > How complicated would it be to set up the fork such that you can put custom > ports in the default branch, and set up another branch to track the official > ports tree? I have a hunch that it shouldn't be too hard to do in .git/config > o

Re: [macports-ports] 03/03: lbdb: Update to 0.42

2016-11-10 Thread Ryan Schmidt
> On Nov 10, 2016, at 8:55 AM, Rainer Müller wrote: > > On 2016-11-10 15:19, Ryan Schmidt wrote: >> Ryan Schmidt (ryandesign) pushed a commit to branch master >> in repository macports-ports. >> >> >> https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/commit/4e836559279a752ee090ed4aa8f1b0c3aa7d0a9a >>

Re: [macports-ports] 03/03: lbdb: Update to 0.42

2016-11-10 Thread Rainer Müller
On 2016-11-10 15:19, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > Ryan Schmidt (ryandesign) pushed a commit to branch master > in repository macports-ports. > > https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/commit/4e836559279a752ee090ed4aa8f1b0c3aa7d0a9a > > commit 4e836559279a752ee090ed4aa8f1b0c3aa7d0a9a Author: Ryan Schmi

RE: Issues with upgrading with private repositories

2016-11-10 Thread Artur Szostak
Thank you for the explanation. Indeed, my problem was that the Portindex was out of date and not being updated, because the Portfiles had time stamps older than the Portindex itself. Cheers Artur From: Clemens Lang [c...@macports.org] Sent: 09 November

Re: GitHub migration complete

2016-11-10 Thread René J . V . Bertin
Out of curiosity: The typical situation for ports tree forks will be that the master branch tracks macports-ports/origin/master while anything personal/custom will be kept in a personal branch. How complicated would it be to set up the fork such that you can put custom ports in the default bra