I'm delighted to receive the progress report, and especially the
mention of tail recursion. Am I right in guessing that all tail calls
will benefit, so that n levels of tail recursion will use O(1) stack
space rather than O(n)?
Doug McIlroy
On Thu, Apr 3, 2025 at 3:37 PM Eric Blake wrote:
>
> On
On Fri, Apr 04, 2025 at 03:52:54AM -0400, Douglas McIlroy wrote:
> I'm delighted to receive the progress report, and especially the
> mention of tail recursion. Am I right in guessing that all tail calls
> will benefit, so that n levels of tail recursion will use O(1) stack
> space rather than O(n)
On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 05:35:36PM -0400, Dennis Clarke via Bug reports for the
GNU m4 macro processor wrote:
>
> This has already been reported and it is known that the m4-1.4.19 will
> no longer build out of the box on a recent Linux machine. Certainly not
> with any recent GCC and perfectly sa
Hi Eric,
Eric Blake writes:
> I would love some assistance in the effort, even if it is as simple as
> curating a list of ALL commits to branch-1.4 and branch-1.6 since the
> two REALLY diverged (warning: back then, I was not using 'git
> cherry-pick -x' to identify when a patch was applied to o
