On 3 Jan 2007, at 14:31, Eric Blake wrote:
Hi Gary, and happy new year,
A Happy New Year to you and all M4teans :-)
According to Gary V. Vaughan on 12/29/2006 1:27 PM:
I think the only change in the POSIX wording would be to remove
the forbid aspect, and instead list all the required operato
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Gary V. Vaughan on 12/29/2006 1:27 PM:
> Hi Eric,
Hi Gary, and happy new year,
>
> On 28 Dec 2006, at 14:41, Eric Blake wrote:
>> The current wording of the m4 eval macro forbids implementations from
>> providing the , and ?: operators
Hi Eric,
On 28 Dec 2006, at 14:41, Eric Blake wrote:
The current wording of the m4 eval macro forbids implementations from
providing the , and ?: operators as extensions, even though these
operators could reasonably be implemented (all of the other forbidden
operators involve C language constru
