subscribe
rgheck writes:
> Michael Thompson wrote:
> > I see that you were trying to change the color of a Chapter Heading, in
> > particular. This does seem like a mess, easily reproducible by me;
> > titles and sections seem to work,
> though. Evidently a problem for the masters.
> >
> >
> The reaso
Hi Anders,
many thanks for your initiative.
I encoutered this problem lots of time.
Knowing where to look becuase of some very basic knowledge of topygraphy
didn't help me. So, Thanks a lot.
@Jürgen, @Uwe:
Does that mean it will work with 1.6?
Cheers
Hellmut
--
Dr. Hellmut Weber [
Hi, Bennett,
I checked Console.app, and found nothing related to LyX installation.
Here is what I found.
Hi Biao,
Bennett is the expert here, but just some questions from me:
- Does LyX work (i.e. start, function and produce pdf:s)?
- Did you install TeX before installing LyX? (I take it you d
Hellmut Weber wrote:
> @Jürgen, @Uwe:
> Does that mean it will work with 1.6?
Anders' patch has been committed to both 1.6svn and 1.5.4svn.
(However, I still cannot paste ligatures from Adobe Reader under Linux; maybe
the KDE klipper is to blame).
Jürgen
Hi, Anders,
I can tell Bennett is an expert just by how he asked the question.
The installation failed, so I did not run LyX. Yes, I installed TeX
with MacTeX before LyX.
This is my first time installing LyX. My Mac Version is MacOSX-10.4.11.
On Jan 14, 2008 7:51 PM, Anders Ekberg <[EMAIL PROTECT
Try to start LyX anyway and see what happens (the installation script
is normally not needed for LyX to function). If it starts, try to open
the Tutorial from the help menu and create a pdf ( View -> PDF
(pdflatex) )
If it doesn't work try LyX->Reconfigure and restart LyX. If that
fails, tr
On Jan 14, 2008, at 8:03 AM, Biao Wu wrote:
Hi, Anders,
I can tell Bennett is an expert just by how he asked the question.
The installation failed, so I did not run LyX. Yes, I installed TeX
with MacTeX before LyX.
This is my first time installing LyX. My Mac Version is
MacOSX-10.4.11.
The
Well, of course now that I'm trying to reproduce it, I can't. :-( ... no,
actually it's :-).
I'm wondering if at some point I didn't change the PDF generator, as Steve
Litt points out in another message.
Well, it works so if I see it again I'll send the document.
Thanks!
L
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008
On Jan 14, 2008 10:31 PM, Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 14, 2008, at 8:03 AM, Biao Wu wrote:
>
> > Hi, Anders,
> >
> > I can tell Bennett is an expert just by how he asked the question.
> > The installation failed, so I did not run LyX. Yes, I installed TeX
> > with MacTeX before
Looks like something has gone wrong with your TeX-installation. I
think the easiest is to re-install MacTeX then re-run the LyX-installer.
Anders
On 14 jan 2008, at 16.20, Biao Wu wrote:
On Jan 14, 2008 10:31 PM, Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jan 14, 2008, at 8:03 AM, Biao Wu
On 10.01.2008, at 02:33, Bennett Helm wrote:
Better yet, look at the mac-bind.pdf file that is included with the
LyX/Mac distribution. Insert footnote is not defined there, but you
can define it yourself by creating a file with the following:
\bind_file mac.bind
\bind "S-C-F"
On Jan 14, 2008, at 11:16 AM, Daniel Lohmann wrote:
On 10.01.2008, at 02:33, Bennett Helm wrote:
Better yet, look at the mac-bind.pdf file that is included with
the LyX/Mac distribution. Insert footnote is not defined there,
but you can define it yourself by creating a file with the followi
On Jan 14, 2008, at 11:16 AM, Anders Ekberg wrote:
I re-ran the installer. There is no dialog pop up after it asks about
the template
file and before the AppleScript error message. The only change is
that
"Install default LyX
templates" gets checked.
I don't even have this ~/Library/texmf/t
Hello,
I have 1.4.3. I get a message that lyx2lyx cannot convert from an
earlier version of lyx. What should i do?
TIA
--
myriam
Myriam Abramson wrote:
Hello,
I have 1.4.3. I get a message that lyx2lyx cannot convert from an
earlier version of lyx. What should i do?
There are two possibilities: The file is actually from an older version
of LyX (1.5), or the file is corrupt. To find out, open the file in a
text edito
Alexis Huxley wrote:
Hi, I'm using Subversion to embed various info about released versions
of a document I've written inside the document itself. The .lyx format
being text, this works *almost* fine.
For example I have a note in the document containing:
$LastChangedRevision: 2791 $
an
On 14 jan 2008, at 17.51, Bennett Helm wrote:
On Jan 14, 2008, at 11:16 AM, Anders Ekberg wrote:
I re-ran the installer. There is no dialog pop up after it asks
about
the template
file and before the AppleScript error message. The only change is
that
"Install default LyX
templates" gets c
I've been using Fedora ever since I started using Linux, but the
second-rate status of KDE under Fedora is starting to get to me, so I'm
thinking about switching. But then: to what? I don't think Kubuntu is
for me. Gentoo would be an option, but then I'm not sure I want to be
quite that bleed
G. Milde wrote:
On 12.01.08, rgheck wrote:
The issue has to do with the use
of color in chapter and section heading---headings, in particular, that
appear as page headers. You always have to be careful with so-called
"moving arguments". But the point remains: You don't really want to make
David Hewitt wrote:
This query spins off of a recent question from Richard Heck in response to
another post. I put it in its own thread to potentially gather more
opinions.
What previewers do Windows people use with LyX other than YAP? Are there
"better" alternatives?
If so, how do we switch Ly
On 1/14/08, rgheck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've been using Fedora ever since I started using Linux, but the
> second-rate status of KDE under Fedora is starting to get to me, so I'm
> thinking about switching. But then: to what? I don't think Kubuntu is
> for me. Gentoo would be an option, b
> thinking about switching. But then: to what? I don't think Kubuntu is
> for me.
Why ever not?
\d
--
Truth in matters of religion is simply the opinion that has survived.
-- Oscar Wilde
Fonty Python and other dev news at:
http://otherwiseingle.blogspot.com/
On Monday 14 January 2008 17:02:43 rgheck wrote:
> If the file is from 1.5, upgrade to 1.4.5.1: It can read files from 1.5.
> If the problem is file corruption, we can try to solve the problem if
> you post the file here.
Sometimes that is not possible due to privacy reasons, in some cases you c
On Monday 14 January 2008 17:18:05 rgheck wrote:
> I've been using Fedora ever since I started using Linux, but the
> second-rate status of KDE under Fedora is starting to get to me, so I'm
> thinking about switching. But then: to what? I don't think Kubuntu is
> for me. Gentoo would be an option,
Liviu Andronic wrote:
On 1/14/08, rgheck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've been using Fedora ever since I started using Linux, but the
second-rate status of KDE under Fedora is starting to get to me, so I'm
thinking about switching. But then: to what? I don't think Kubuntu is
for me. Gentoo wou
Donn wrote:
thinking about switching. But then: to what? I don't think Kubuntu is
for me.
Why ever not?
Well, I tried it on a laptop a while ago, and it kept crashing. That'd
be the main thing.
Richard
On Monday 14 January 2008 12:18, rgheck wrote:
> I've been using Fedora ever since I started using Linux, but the
> second-rate status of KDE under Fedora is starting to get to me, so I'm
> thinking about switching. But then: to what? I don't think Kubuntu is
> for me. Gentoo would be an option, bu
Donn wrote:
Well, I tried it on a laptop a while ago, and it kept crashing. That'd
be the main thing.
Ah, I think you'll suffer on laptops in general -- unless you get one of the
newer ones that come with some kind of Gnu/Linux these days. I have been using
Kubuntu for almost 4 years, bu
> Well, I tried it on a laptop a while ago, and it kept crashing. That'd
> be the main thing.
Ah, I think you'll suffer on laptops in general -- unless you get one of the
newer ones that come with some kind of Gnu/Linux these days. I have been
using Kubuntu for almost 4 years, but still can't ge
José Matos wrote:
On Monday 14 January 2008 17:18:05 rgheck wrote:
I've been using Fedora ever since I started using Linux, but the
second-rate status of KDE under Fedora is starting to get to me, so I'm
thinking about switching. But then: to what? I don't think Kubuntu is
for me. Gentoo woul
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 12:18:05PM -0500, rgheck wrote:
>
> I've been using Fedora ever since I started using Linux, but the
> second-rate status of KDE under Fedora is starting to get to me, so I'm
> thinking about switching. But then: to what? I don't think Kubuntu is for
> me. Gentoo would be
On Monday 14 January 2008 11:18, rgheck wrote:
> I've been using Fedora ever since I started using Linux, but the
> second-rate status of KDE under Fedora is starting to get to me, so I'm
> thinking about switching. But then: to what? I don't think Kubuntu is
> for me. Gentoo would be an option, bu
I'm seeing a couple of issues with LyX 1.5.1 on XUbuntu 7.10 (Gutsy) that I
don't have a solution for... The package is from the Ubuntu repositories.
The two issues are:
(1) It appears to be really slow when trying to scroll text on the screen.
It's not horrible, but its not as fast as the 1.4.x
On Tue, 15 Jan 2008, rgheck shared this with us all:
>--}
>--} I've been using Fedora ever since I started using Linux, but the
>--} second-rate status of KDE under Fedora is starting to get to me, so I'm
>--} thinking about switching. But then: to what? I don't think Kubuntu is
>--} for me. Gentoo
Hello,
I have been working on latex to typeset some documents that I would
like to publish as websites, some of those have pstrees which do not
fit on A4 pages, therefore some of the image gets truncated, what I
would like to do is export the tree only to a graphic, or perhaps
export the whole doc
George De Bruin wrote:
I'm seeing a couple of issues with LyX 1.5.1 on XUbuntu 7.10 (Gutsy) that I
don't have a solution for... The package is from the Ubuntu repositories. The
two issues are:
(1) It appears to be really slow when trying to scroll text on the screen.
It's not horrible, but it
Description of the problem:
> How can I increase the space between numbering and name of the part in
> table of contents?
>
> It should be (part Roman 8):
> VIII Illustration
>
> But it looks like:
> Vllustration
>
> I'm using Lyx 1.5.3 and scrbook. I don't want to use the package tocloft
> be
Hi,
I had this problem:
I'm writing a text with scrbook that includes 2 tables of contents
(tocs), the first one is a short toc (toc depth 0), the second one is a
detailed toc (toc depth 5).
The short toc is generated with package shorttoc. My problem: How can I
get pagebreaks for each toc separa
On Jan 15, 2008 12:51 AM, Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 14, 2008, at 11:16 AM, Anders Ekberg wrote:
>
> >> I re-ran the installer. There is no dialog pop up after it asks about
> >> the template
> >> file and before the AppleScript error message. The only change is
> >> that
> >>
On Jan 14, 2008, at 7:30 PM, Biao Wu wrote:
Bennett, I created ~/Library/texmf/tex/latex. It did not change
anything. I got
the same error message. Biao
I'm stumped. Try opening Terminal.app, and typing this:
mkdir -p ~/Library/texmf/tex/latex/lyx
cp /path/to/LyX.app/Contents/Resources/tex
On Jan 14, 2008 10:18 AM, rgheck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've been using Fedora ever since I started using Linux, but the
> second-rate status of KDE under Fedora is starting to get to me, so I'm
> thinking about switching. But then: to what? I don't think Kubuntu is
> for me. Gentoo would b
rgheck wrote:
George De Bruin wrote:
I'm seeing a couple of issues with LyX 1.5.1 on XUbuntu 7.10 (Gutsy)
that I don't have a solution for... The package is from the Ubuntu
repositories. The two issues are:
(1) It appears to be really slow when trying to scroll text on the
screen.
It's not
On January 14, 2008 12:18:05 rgheck wrote:
> I've been using Fedora ever since I started using Linux, but the
> second-rate status of KDE under Fedora is starting to get to me, so I'm
> thinking about switching. But then: to what? I don't think Kubuntu is
> for me. Gentoo would be an option, but th
M-L wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jan 2008, rgheck shared this with us all:
--}
--} I've been using Fedora ever since I started using Linux, but the
--} second-rate status of KDE under Fedora is starting to get to me, so I'm
--} thinking about switching. But then: to what? I don't think Kubuntu is
--} fo
William Seager wrote:
On January 14, 2008 12:18:05 rgheck wrote:
I've been using Fedora ever since I started using Linux, but the
second-rate status of KDE under Fedora is starting to get to me, so I'm
thinking about switching. But then: to what? I don't think Kubuntu is
for me. Gentoo would
Bob Lounsbury wrote:
On Jan 14, 2008 10:18 AM, rgheck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've been using Fedora ever since I started using Linux, but the
second-rate status of KDE under Fedora is starting to get to me, so I'm
thinking about switching. But then: to what? I don't think Kubuntu is
for m
On 1/15/08, rgheck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > My vote is Slackware. [snip]
> Thanks. I'd not even have thought of Slackware, but it may well be the
> right distro for me. The "learning about Linux" part is what attracts me
> to Gentoo---I don't think I'm quite ready for Linux from Scratch---but
George De Bruin wrote:
rgheck wrote:
Hmm. That's very strange. The Ubuntu people should really get with
it. It's one thing being slow to update major versions---Debian etch
is still at 1.4.3---but it's criminal not to keep up with minor
version updates.
And I really don't want to compile fr
rgheck wrote:
Hmm. That's very strange. The Ubuntu people should really get with it.
It's one thing being slow to update major versions---Debian etch is
still at 1.4.3---but it's criminal not to keep up with minor version
updates.
And I really don't want to compile from the source...
I don't
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 22:55:29 -0500
rgheck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> M-L wrote:
> > On Tue, 15 Jan 2008, rgheck shared this with us all:
> >
> >> --}
> >> --} I've been using Fedora ever since I started using Linux, but
> >> the --} second-rate status of KDE under Fedora is starting to get
>
George De Bruin wrote:
rgheck wrote:
(1) It appears to be really slow when trying to scroll text on the
screen.
It's not horrible, but its not as fast as the 1.4.x series.
Try 1.5.3. Some work has been done on scrolling, and a LOT more is to
come in 1.6.
I would, but I don't see a .deb out
I'm using sidux (based on Debian unstable) and have been since it branched off
of Kanotix. It's easily stable enough for my everyday use, and yet things like
the latest LyX are available quite quickly from repositories (and there's
nothing stopping one from downloading and installing from the la
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008, rgheck wrote:
I vote for Gentoo. If you've got a quad-core, then give it something
to sink its teeth into (I'd love to know how long the openoffice
compile would be)!
Or how long it takes to compile LyX... :-) [*]
/C
[*] Seriously, I'm probably interested in the specs
rgheck wrote:
I've been using Fedora ever since I started using Linux, but the
second-rate status of KDE under Fedora is starting to get to me, so I'm
thinking about switching. But then: to what? I don't think Kubuntu is
for me. Gentoo would be an option, but then I'm not sure I want to be
q
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 11:04:05PM -0500, rgheck wrote:
> George De Bruin wrote:
>> rgheck wrote:
(1) It appears to be really slow when trying to scroll text on the
screen.
It's not horrible, but its not as fast as the 1.4.x series.
>>> Try 1.5.3. Some work has been done on
56 matches
Mail list logo
