> "Diego" == Diego A Puertas F <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Diego> Doesn't sound like a good idea to have the "Insert Cross
Diego> Reference" box list the labels indented?
Diego> The labels indented by the place where they were declared. It
Diego> will be a lot much easier to find one of them
Doesn't sound like a good idea to have the "Insert Cross Reference" box
list the labels indented?
The labels indented by the place where they were declared. It will be a
lot much easier to find one of them when you have (like in my case) about
250 of them.
I mean something like this:
.
The
On Thu, 16 Mar 2000, Tuukka Toivonen wrote:
>
> On Wed, 15 Mar 2000, Uwe Amann wrote:
>
> > While I agree with you, that a LaTeX parser would be very hard to
> > implement, why not try a different solution. I will try to describe
>
> I still think that an heuristic algorithm would do moderatel
On Wed, 15 Mar 2000, Uwe Amann wrote:
> While I agree with you, that a LaTeX parser would be very hard to
> implement, why not try a different solution. I will try to describe
I still think that an heuristic algorithm would do moderately good
work and it would not be that hard, actually, to impl
On Tue, 14 Mar 2000, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Subject: Re: wild development ideas
>
> > Sounds truly wild. If these programms have a scripting or macro
> > language,
>
> Most of the interesting programs are scriptable. Maple e.g:
>
> echo "l
> Reading http://www.sciface.com/products/demos/index.shtml, it seems that
> MuPad is for practical purposes equivalent to Maxima. In fact the syntax
> seems to be so similar that I wonder if it's derived from Macsyma.
Definitely not. AFAIK MuPAD was build from scratch and has no connection
at al
On Wed, 15 Mar 2000, Jean-Pierre.Chretien wrote:
> >>equals ..." oops. What? Exactly, push the 'evaluate' button and the
> >>result is inserted. You are far more productive this way than launching
> >>a seperate application and do import and export manually.
> >>Andre'
> But this use is not so fr
On Wed, 15 Mar 2000, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Well, MuPAD is more or less free,
Yes, but it is not GNU. Apparently it isn't even open source.
> Maple costs. The other day my boss
So it's out of question, IMHO.
> I can't compare any of them to Maxima though...
Reading http://www.sciface.com/pr
>>From: Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Subject: Re: wild development ideas
>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2000 09:03:44 +0100 (MET)
>>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>> I really don't see the point of being able to write matl
> I really don't see the point of being able to write matlab code
> from LyX;
Have you ever used Scientific Workplace?
Imagine something like LyX. You start writing
"It is well know that the integral
\int e^x sin^2 x dx
equals ..." oops. What? Exactly, push the 'eva
>>Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2000 09:22:35 +0200
>>From: Tuukka Toivonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>To: Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Subject: Re: wild development ideas
>>
>>On Tue, 14 Mar 2000, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>>
> Offtopic, but I wonder is MuPad/Maple better than Maxima? I personally
> believe they are not but this is just a belief.
Well, MuPAD is more or less free, Maple costs. The other day my boss
installed MuPAD and told me afterwards that its far from Maple's
capabilities. I do trust him in this cas
On Tue, 14 Mar 2000, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> The problem is parsing. First you have to convert from
> LyX formula (sort of LaTeX) to Maple syntax which is *not* trivial
> since LaTeX does not preserve the logical structure of the formula
Yes, but from LyX ro Octave/Scilab should be actually very
Norm Matloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Here is something which is relatively easy to implement but which I
| believe would be helpful to many people: A word-completion feature
| in the LyX editor, like those of various other editors.
|
| For example, suppose I wish to type the word "reali
The idea is implemented in Scientific Workplace (www.tcisoft.com)
There it is possible to use Maple or Mathematica from a latex(2.09)-shell.
Isn't is possible to use Mathematica from MS-word as well (Wolfram should
have
a addon for that??)
Would indeed be nice to use Scilab or MuPAD or Maxima (
Here is something which is relatively easy to implement but which I
believe would be helpful to many people: A word-completion feature
in the LyX editor, like those of various other editors.
For example, suppose I wish to type the word "realization", and it
already exists elsewhere in my docum
Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > Sounds truly wild. If these programms have a scripting or macro
> > language,
>
> Most of the interesting programs are scriptable. Maple e.g:
>
> echo "lprint(expand((x+1)^3));" | maple -q
>
> --> x^3+3*x^2+3*x+1
>
> The problem is parsing. First y
> Sounds truly wild. If these programms have a scripting or macro
> language,
Most of the interesting programs are scriptable. Maple e.g:
echo "lprint(expand((x+1)^3));" | maple -q
--> x^3+3*x^2+3*x+1
The problem is parsing. First you have to convert from
LyX formula (sort of L
Tuukka Toivonen wrote:
>
> Now, why not integrate[1] Maxima and maybe Octave too to LyX? Imagine
> writing an equation in LyX, and selecting "solve" from Math menu and your
> equation would be solved?
>
> In any case, some automatic way to transfer data between
> Maxima<->Octave<->Scilab<->LyX
This would belong really to lyx-devel, but I'm not used to use that
mailing list...
I just found a _great_ symbolic mathematics program called Maxima. It's
GNU version of Macsyma, which in turn is over 30 years old software. But
it's great, comparable to Mathematica (well, I have never really use
20 matches
Mail list logo
