Dominik Waßenhoven wrote:
> Any help is appreciated.
A change in the source is needed in order to trigger this additional run. This
is something that is doable for 1.6.1. Could you bugzilla it, please?
Jürgen
Dominik Waßenhoven wrote:
> If I run this with LyX 1.6.0, I get an incomplete entry,
> because the @collection entry is cited by the @incollection internally
> and to resolve that @collection entry, a second bibtex run would be
> possible.
Read: would be necessary.
> If I alter the .l
Dear list,
I have a problem regarding the biblatex package, especially my package
which builds on top of biblatex.[1] Attached is a .lyx file which shows
the problem. If I run this with LyX 1.6.0, I get an incomplete entry,
because the @collection entry is cited by the @incollection internally
and
