On Wed, 20 Jul 2011, Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
I've been using the texlive 2010 repository since Fedora 14 and had no
greater problem than having to manually install/replace some individual
packages, depending on the classes/modules employed by the document. The
transition F14 -> F15 was also uneventf
I've been using the texlive 2010 repository since Fedora 14 and had no greater
problem than having to
manually install/replace some individual packages, depending on the
classes/modules employed by the
document.
The transition F14 -> F15 was also uneventful.
On Sunday, July 17, 2011 02:02:10 P
On Sun, 17 Jul 2011, David L. Johnson wrote:
I did that transition some time ago, since AFAIK tetex is no longer
supported, and texlive is. I do not recall any problems with the
transition.
David,
Yes, Thomas dropped support for tetex last year. Since it worked for me I
saw no need to chan
On 07/17/2011 01:02 PM, Rich Shepard wrote:
I've just replaced the tetex I've used for years with texlive-20100722.
LyX fires right up. What I want to know is if there are potential
gotcha's
due to the transition. I expect not, but I'd like to be sure before I hit
one during a critical event
I've just replaced the tetex I've used for years with texlive-20100722.
LyX fires right up. What I want to know is if there are potential gotcha's
due to the transition. I expect not, but I'd like to be sure before I hit
one during a critical event (such as a deadline to produce a document).
Ri
