jos wrote:
Steve Litt wrote:
http://www.troubleshooters.cxm/linux/lyx/compile_1_5.htm
As far as 1.5.3, I'm running a self-compiled (not from a package)
LyX-1.5.3 on
my Mandriva 2007 equipped Athlon XP2600+ with 1.5GB RAM and plenty of disk
space, and I have no latency between keypress and
On Tuesday 06 May 2008 11:59, jos wrote:
> Steve Litt wrote:
> > http://www.troubleshooters.cxm/linux/lyx/compile_1_5.htm
> >
> >
> > As far as 1.5.3, I'm running a self-compiled (not from a package)
> > LyX-1.5.3 on
> > my Mandriva 2007 equipped Athlon XP2600+ with 1.5GB RAM and plenty of
> > disk
wouldn't
it? (but no worries, I have 2GB)
Anyway, while fiddling around, removing and reinstalling the same lyx
version (1.5.2, as I corrected), everything is fine.
I wonder if the problem reappears.
thanks,
Jos
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/slow-typing-in-lyx-1.
annoying typing delay in lyx-1.5.3
> - or what is wrong with my qt4
> ($ rpm -q qt4
> qt4-4.3.2-1.fc6)
>
> thanks,
> jos
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/slow-typing-in-lyx-1.5.3-tp17084281p17084281.html
> Sent from the LyX - Users
On Tuesday 06 May 2008 10:33, jos wrote:
> Typing has become painfully slow after I upgraded from lyx-1.4.4 to
> lyx-1.5.3 on a machine with fedora core 6: there's a very annoying delay
> between a keystroke and the appearance of the corresponding symbol on the
> screen.
>
> Because a rpm of lyx-1.
etting the environment variables QTLIB or QT4LIB to /usr/lib/qt4
doesn't help.
Does anyone have an idea how to:
- either get rid of the annoying typing delay in lyx-1.5.3
- or what is wrong with my qt4
($ rpm -q qt4
qt4-4.3.2-1.fc6)
thanks,
jos
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.
> On Thu, 10 Aug 2000, Tony Dancer wrote:
>
I was having trouble with lyx not being able to keep up with my typing
(which, I admit, is not the fastest nor the most accurate in the world)
...and now I would like to report a solution.
It would appear that after lots of help from a number of place
On Thu, 10 Aug 2000, Tony Dancer wrote:
> I was having problems with back-delete being so slow, this has been
> fixed thanks to help and a patch -- thankyou.
Strange. I had same problem once (with unpatched 1.1.5 on
Linux/x86/Pentium 120 MHz), but now that I tried it feels fast again.
glibc 2.0.
On Thu, Aug 10, 2000 at 02:14:36PM +0100, Tony Dancer wrote:
> It's a vanilla cyrix p200, and it was an RPM install, but because of
> applying the patch it is now an install from a rebuilt RPM, and my
> gcc version is egcs-2.91.66 (egcs-1.1.2 release) (it would appear). It
> is a RH6.1 with update
Tony Dancer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| It's a vanilla cyrix p200, and it was an RPM install, but because of
| applying the patch it is now an install from a rebuilt RPM, and my
| gcc version is egcs-2.91.66 (egcs-1.1.2 release) (it would appear). It
| is a RH6.1 with updates.
Then I think it
It's a vanilla cyrix p200, and it was an RPM install, but because of
applying the patch it is now an install from a rebuilt RPM, and my
gcc version is egcs-2.91.66 (egcs-1.1.2 release) (it would appear). It
is a RH6.1 with updates.
Tony
> What cpu are you running on?
> What compiler/libraries?
Tony Dancer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Dear all:
|
| I was having problems with back-delete being so slow, this has been
| fixed thanks to help and a patch -- thankyou.
What cpu are you running on?
What compiler/libraries? (or are you using binary packages like rpm?)
Lgb
Dear all:
I was having problems with back-delete being so slow, this has been
fixed thanks to help and a patch -- thankyou.
But now I see part of the problem persists. 1.1.5fix1 seems very slow
when I type. I do not notice the effects when I type a paragraph from
scratch. However, when I go back
13 matches
Mail list logo
