On 9.03.05, Helge Hafting wrote:
> Stefano Franchi wrote:
> >On Mar 8, 2005, at 4:20 AM, Helge Hafting wrote:
>
> Now, some publishers do provide latex classes, in those cases it is
> only a question of getting lyx support. The simplest cases merely
> involves getting a few "\usepackages" into th
Stefano Franchi wrote:
On Mar 8, 2005, at 4:20 AM, Helge Hafting wrote:
There is few publishers, if any at all, who will provide you with a
lyx class. But it
doesn't have to be the publisher, it is something any latex/lyx
person could do. The
publisher should really offer a discount (i.e. more p
On Mar 8, 2005, at 4:20 AM, Helge Hafting wrote:
There is few publishers, if any at all, who will provide you with a
lyx class. But it
doesn't have to be the publisher, it is something any latex/lyx person
could do. The
publisher should really offer a discount (i.e. more pay) for a
camera-ready
Stefano Franchi wrote:
On Mar 4, 2005, at 6:21 AM, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
Well, the right publisher is the publisher that has a good reputation
in your
subject.
Couldn't agree more. And in my field (philosophy, and especially
history of philosophy) TeX is conspicuously absent. Which is bad,
On Mar 4, 2005, at 6:21 AM, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
William F. Adams wrote:
For books: Big publishers (i.e. big UP presses) behave as journals:
they want word files and will re-typeset everything. (Actually some
p.
houses will retype everything from paper...). Smaller publishing
houses and/or
William F. Adams wrote:
> > For books: Big publishers (i.e. big UP presses) behave as journals:
> > they want word files and will re-typeset everything. (Actually some p.
> > houses will retype everything from paper...). Smaller publishing
> > houses and/or imprints will want a camera-ready manuscr
On Mar 4, 2005, at 12:47 AM, William F. Adams wrote:
They did do one book on TeX, Norman Walsh's _Making TeX work_ (and
may've been put out that they didn't get some TeX books they wanted
early on) but have since been said to've likened it to ``wombat sex''
for its obscurity. You can find MTW on
On Mar 4, 2005, at 12:32 AM, Rich Shepard wrote:
One of publishing's great mysteries -- to me, at least -- is why
O'Reilly &
Associates insist that their authors submit manuscripts in Word
format. I
know several authors who work strictly in linux and despise having to
use
OO.o then translate t
On Thu, 3 Mar 2005, William F. Adams wrote:
On Mar 3, 2005, at 12:16 PM, Stefano Franchi wrote:
For books: Big publishers (i.e. big UP presses) behave as journals: they
want word files and will re-typeset everything. (Actually some p. houses
will retype everything from paper...).
Well, ... Spr
On Mar 3, 2005, at 12:16 PM, Stefano Franchi wrote:
For books: Big publishers (i.e. big UP presses) behave as journals:
they want word files and will re-typeset everything. (Actually some p.
houses will retype everything from paper...). Smaller publishing
houses and/or imprints will want a camer
10 matches
Mail list logo
