een using LyX for a number of years. Because I was reusing a
> >>> lot of math macros, I started putting them in a separate file and
> >>> loading that file at the beginning of each document with an input
> >>> statement. Over time, the list has grown and I wan
On 1/24/24 03:09, Kornel Benko wrote:
Am Mon, 22 Jan 2024 17:35:25 -0500
schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck :
On 1/22/24 16:27, Michael Dean Pugh wrote:
I've been using LyX for a number of years. Because I was reusing a
lot of math macros, I started putting them in a separate file and
lo
Am Mon, 22 Jan 2024 17:35:25 -0500
schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck :
> On 1/22/24 16:27, Michael Dean Pugh wrote:
> > I've been using LyX for a number of years. Because I was reusing a
> > lot of math macros, I started putting them in a separate file and
> > loading tha
On 1/22/24 16:27, Michael Dean Pugh wrote:
I've been using LyX for a number of years. Because I was reusing a
lot of math macros, I started putting them in a separate file and
loading that file at the beginning of each document with an input
statement. Over time, the list has grown
I've been using LyX for a number of years. Because I was reusing a lot of math
macros, I started putting them in a separate file and loading that file at the
beginning of each document with an input statement. Over time, the list has
grown and I wanted to search for a macro to see how
Am Freitag, den 06.08.2021, 11:15 -0400 schrieb Paul A. Rubin:
> On 8/6/21 5:52 AM, Tobias Hilbricht wrote:
> > Dear readers of this list,
> >
> > in my worksheets in chemistry I have to write chemical formulas and
> > physical quantities very often. But while that is very easy to do
> > in
> > Ly
On 8/6/21 5:52 AM, Tobias Hilbricht wrote:
> Dear readers of this list,
>
> in my worksheets in chemistry I have to write chemical formulas and
> physical quantities very often. But while that is very easy to do in
> LyX out of the box with chemical formulas due to the integration of
> mhchem and i
On 8/6/21 5:52 AM, Tobias Hilbricht wrote:
Dear readers of this list,
in my worksheets in chemistry I have to write chemical formulas and
physical quantities very often. But while that is very easy to do in
LyX out of the box with chemical formulas due to the integration of
mhchem and its macro
Dear readers of this list,
in my worksheets in chemistry I have to write chemical formulas and
physical quantities very often. But while that is very easy to do in
LyX out of the box with chemical formulas due to the integration of
mhchem and its macro \ce, I am still trying to achieve something
s
On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 9:06 AM Richard Kimberly Heck
wrote:
> On 11/10/20 1:13 PM, Joel Kulesza wrote:
> > Colleagues,
> >
> > Is there a way to detokenize math macros in LyX such that characters
> > like an underscore are not passed? I'd like to highlight t
On 11/10/20 1:13 PM, Joel Kulesza wrote:
Colleagues,
Is there a way to detokenize math macros in LyX such that characters
like an underscore are not passed? I'd like to highlight text and
then apply the macro (via toolbar button/shortcut), but it passes
through characters without esc
Colleagues,
Is there a way to detokenize math macros in LyX such that characters like
an underscore are not passed? I'd like to highlight text and then apply
the macro (via toolbar button/shortcut), but it passes through characters
without escaping them automatically.
For example, pleas
On 06/08/2018 01:39 PM, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
On 06/08/2018 08:31 AM, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
On 06/08/2018 01:14 AM, Reuven Segev wrote:
Hi,
When using LyX to produce slides with Beamer, I encountered the
following issue. Beamer produces an empty slide wherever I insert my
math macros
On 06/08/2018 08:31 AM, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
> On 06/08/2018 01:14 AM, Reuven Segev wrote:
>> Hi,
>> When using LyX to produce slides with Beamer, I encountered the
>> following issue. Beamer produces an empty slide wherever I insert my
>> math macros. I could not thi
On 06/08/2018 01:14 AM, Reuven Segev wrote:
Hi,
When using LyX to produce slides with Beamer, I encountered the
following issue. Beamer produces an empty slide wherever I insert my
math macros. I could not think of a way to "encapsulate" them.
Any help will be appreciated.
Be
Hi,
When using LyX to produce slides with Beamer, I encountered the following
issue. Beamer produces an empty slide wherever I insert my math macros. I
could not think of a way to "encapsulate" them.
Any help will be appreciated.
Best,
Reuven Segev
Further I would like to
> structure the different Includes by using Inputs for the associated
> sections. For each Input, I set the Include-file it is in as the main
> document. No problem so far.
>
> But I haven’t got to grips with my math macros file after several
> attempts
for the associated sections. For each
Input, I set the Include-file it is in as the main document. No problem so far.
But I haven’t got to grips with my math macros file after several attempts
(tried also with https://wiki.lyx.org/Tips/ChildMathMacros
<https://wiki.lyx.org/Tips/ChildMath
Le 02/10/2015 09:58, Liviu Andronic a écrit :
On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Guenter Milde wrote:
On 2015-10-02, Liviu Andronic wrote:
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 11:49 PM, Guillaume Munch wrote:
Le 01/10/2015 12:03, David a écrit :
...
As of now, there is a list of math macros in the
On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2015-10-02, Liviu Andronic wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 11:49 PM, Guillaume Munch wrote:
>>> Le 01/10/2015 12:03, David a écrit :
>
> ...
>
>>> As of now, there is a list of math macros in the navi
On 2015-10-02, Liviu Andronic wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 11:49 PM, Guillaume Munch wrote:
>> Le 01/10/2015 12:03, David a écrit :
...
>> As of now, there is a list of math macros in the navigation menu and the
>> outline pane. Especially the outline pane works well
Am 01.10.2015 um 23:49 schrieb Guillaume Munch:
>
> As of now, there is a list of math macros in the navigation menu and the
> outline pane. Especially the outline pane works well for that: math
> macros can now be accessed and ordered either by appearance or
> alphabetica
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 11:49 PM, Guillaume Munch wrote:
> Le 01/10/2015 12:03, David a écrit :
>>
>> Dear Lyx users,
>>
>> I work on a document that contains a long list of math macros
>> defining various mathematical symbols. I would like to search in
>&g
Le 01/10/2015 12:03, David a écrit :
Dear Lyx users,
I work on a document that contains a long list of math macros
defining various mathematical symbols. I would like to search in
this list.
Please consider the example Lyx file attached. How could I find, for
example, \speedOfLight ? I have
Dear Lyx users,
I work on a document that contains a long list of math macros defining
various mathematical symbols. I would like to search in this list.
Please consider the example Lyx file attached. How could I find, for
example, \speedOfLight ? I have tried Edit > Find (Quick) and E
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 3:27 AM, Reuven Segev wrote:
> Hi,
> How can import a LaTeX file into LyX so that the LaTeX macros are imported
> into LyX math macros?
>
Cross-posted at http://latex-community.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=26277
Scott
Hi,
How can import a LaTeX file into LyX so that the LaTeX macros are imported
into LyX math macros?
Thanks
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2014-01-22, Liviu Andronic wrote:
>
>> So, is it a good or bad idea to use math macros to emulate text
>> macros? Is there a nicer approach?
>
> IMO, it is a bad idea. "Math macros" are for mathematica
On 2014-01-22, Liviu Andronic wrote:
> So, is it a good or bad idea to use math macros to emulate text
> macros? Is there a nicer approach?
IMO, it is a bad idea. "Math macros" are for mathematical typesetting (and
even then not the cleanest LaTeX code results).
The text alte
here a straightforward, native way (i.e. non-ERT) to do this in
LyX? I tried to use 'math macros' for this job (see attached):
- insert > math > macro
- Name= '\myname'
- TeX = ctrl+m to put the text into an mbox, then type 'M. Simpson'
But sofar I identified two
On 2012-07-22, Allen Barker wrote:
> On 07/20/2012 03:40 AM, Guenter Milde wrote:
>> Also, math-macros are document specific - defining a math-macro in one
>> document does not make it available in other ones. This is why my
>> documents include a file of commonly used math
From: Richard Heck [rgh...@lyx.org]
Sent: Sunday, July 22, 2012 10:20 AM
>So the attached shows a way around this problem. The difference between \test
>and \lest
>doesn't show up inside LyX, but it does in the output.
Is there any way to put these inside a preview inset?
Scott
On 07/21/2012 11:34 PM, Allen Barker wrote:
On 07/20/2012 03:40 AM, Guenter Milde wrote:
Also, math-macros are document specific - defining a math-macro in one
document does not make it available in other ones. This is why my
documents include a file of commonly used math macros -- just like I
On 07/20/2012 03:40 AM, Guenter Milde wrote:
Also, math-macros are document specific - defining a math-macro in one
document does not make it available in other ones. This is why my
documents include a file of commonly used math macros -- just like I
\input a file with commonly used preamble
at
> features. I really want to like LyX. What a great concept. And
> yet... I find LyX math macros an absolutely horror. Why construct LyX
> to ignore macros in an imported LaTex preamble? Why defeat the most
> popular usage, and why not write something to properly automate the
> impo
great concept. And yet...
I find LyX math macros an absolutely horror. Why construct LyX to ignore macros
in an imported LaTex preamble? Why defeat the most
popular usage, and why not write something to properly automate the import?
It's a
fact that exchanging LaTex with collaborators and opening
>
> > A "show output anyway" button would be great.
> > However, if LyX consistency were assured, there's no need for it (expect
> > when using ERT).
>
> ... or the LaTeX preamble (1) or an outdated TeX distribution (2) or a
> package
> combination with conflicts (3) or ... (?)
>
> Günter
>
I repe
cros perfectly if the master document is open.
This is a bug. (Around LyX 1.4, math-macros were resolved in any
open buffer - related or not.)
> My complaint is this: if LyX is able to interpret things and display them in
> the editor, it should be able to generate the output. That's
>
> But the only one for truly consistent behaviour. If you want to export
> stand-alone, uncheck the master setting.
>
Even if the master setting is not set in the child, LyX still display all
macros perfectly if the master document is open.
My complaint is this: if LyX is able to interpret thing
e the includeonly feature
to compile a subset of sub-documents where LaTeX will ensure
(almost) correct page numbers and references and LyX will use the
parent doc settings instead of the child-doc ones.
>> > Actually, I regularly compile stand-alone child docs (to save time on
>> >
cument with thousand of pages I will obligated to generate
all pages?
I do not agree.
> > Actually, I regularly compile stand-alone child docs (to save time on
> > checking the appearance in the output). I have set up a "stand-alone"
> > branch for math-macros and bib
acro
> expansions in the child doc but not make them available in stand-alone
> compilation.
>
> The same argument would hold for references to sections, equations,
> tables and figures in other parts of the document.
>
> Actually, I regularly compile stand-alone child docs (to save
n.
The same argument would hold for references to sections, equations,
tables and figures in other parts of the document.
Actually, I regularly compile stand-alone child docs (to save time on
checking the appearance in the output). I have set up a "stand-alone"
branch for math-macros an
Guenter Milde wrote:
> For truly consistent behaviour, we would have to disable stand-alone
> compilation of documents setting a master (except for "included" (vs.
> "input") documents).
Why this? I have many documents with a master set that get compiled stand-
alone from time to time and should _
g for a more "user oriented behavior". I mean, "if I can see
> everything right on the screen, what's the problem?"
> This is how I feel about the current behavior. LyX is handling everything on
> the editor, since all math macros are interpreted correctly when I open
>
> Yes I am able to do what you describe in 1.6. In your example child doc,
> you did not set the master setting, did you?
>
Indeed.
I was in a hurry and I forgot it. ;/
---
Diego Queiroz
On 05/09/2011 02:38 PM, Julien Rioux wrote:
>
> Yes I am able to do what you describe in 1.6. In your example child
> doc, you did not set the master setting, did you? But anyway, I
> corrected it and still in 2.1.0svn the compilation of the child is
> broken:
>
> Undefined control sequence \anymac
On 09/05/2011 2:23 PM, Diego Queiroz wrote:
Which workaround? You said math macros don't work within child docs, I say
they work for me. No workaround necessary.
Maybe I misunderstood you.
I was citing your workaround to include bibtex in the childs.
"I use a branch named &
>
> Which workaround? You said math macros don't work within child docs, I say
> they work for me. No workaround necessary.
>
Maybe I misunderstood you.
I was citing your workaround to include bibtex in the childs.
>> "I use a branch named "child only"
On 09/05/2011 1:44 PM, Diego Queiroz wrote:
So, I do not experience your problem. However document settings and stuff
that gets defined in the preamble need to be set in both master and child
docs.
--
Julien
Actually, the answer is: yes, you do experience the very same problem.
Otherwise you
won't need to go after a workaround, right? :-)
As I said before, I'm sure there are several ways to workaround this
limitation (I am not searching for one).
I just think we should focus on make LyX avoid these errors by itself.
Cheers,
---
Diego
Which workaround? You said math ma
>
> So, I do not experience your problem. However document settings and stuff
> that gets defined in the preamble need to be set in both master and child
> docs.
> --
> Julien
>
Actually, the answer is: yes, you do experience the very same problem.
Otherwise you won't need to go after a workaround
On 09/05/2011 10:22 AM, Diego Queiroz wrote:
I'm not sure if this is a bug report or a feature request. Probably the
second one.
In LyX it's ok to define a Math Macro in a Master document and use it in a
child one. It's also ok to use math macros that are defined in a child and
an, "if I can see
everything right on the screen, what's the problem?"
This is how I feel about the current behavior. LyX is handling everything on
the editor, since all math macros are interpreted correctly when I open any
document, but I can't generate the file because of
On 05/09/2011 11:05 AM, Diego Queiroz wrote:
>
>> If you want to compile just one chapter as part of a larger document,
>> then you need to use the \includeonly support, accessible from
>> Document>Settings.
> I was not aware of this feature. Thanks for the hint.
>
It's new in 2.0.0.
> But it is a
>
> If you ask to compile just the child, then you are asking to compile it
> as a standalone document, so it is no surprise that this does not work.
>
Exactly. :-)
> If you want to compile just one chapter as part of a larger document,
> then you need to use the \includeonly support, accessibl
On 05/09/2011 10:22 AM, Diego Queiroz wrote:
> I'm not sure if this is a bug report or a feature request. Probably the
> second one.
>
> In LyX it's ok to define a Math Macro in a Master document and use it in a
> child one. It's also ok to use math macros that are d
I'm not sure if this is a bug report or a feature request. Probably the
second one.
In LyX it's ok to define a Math Macro in a Master document and use it in a
child one. It's also ok to use math macros that are defined in a child and
use it in other child document.
In both case
On 2011-04-20, Julien Rioux wrote:
> On 20/04/2011 3:39 PM, Mathieu Dubois wrote:
>> Hello,
>> I'm a new LyX user but I'm a bit experienced with LaTeX.
>> I have developed my own set of LaTeX math macros (mainly to have simple
>> and coherent notations). I
On 20/04/2011 3:39 PM, Mathieu Dubois wrote:
Hello,
I'm a new LyX user but I'm a bit experienced with LaTeX.
I have developed my own set of LaTeX math macros (mainly to have simple
and coherent notations). It's not a package but just a tex file that I
\input in my documents.
I
Hello,
I'm a new LyX user but I'm a bit experienced with LaTeX.
I have developed my own set of LaTeX math macros (mainly to have simple
and coherent notations). It's not a package but just a tex file that I
\input in my documents.
I have \input'ed my tex file in the p
Dear All,When I define a math macro in a parent document, it doesn't display appropriately in the LyX child document. The output pdf is correct, but the display in the LyX file is not. Any help on fixing this for LyX 1.6.5 on Mac OS 10.6.3 would be appreciated. Attached are sample files and crop
Thanks. It works.
Murtaza
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 5:46 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
wrote:
> Le 30 déc. 09 à 09:59, Murtaza Safri a écrit :
>
>> I am typing in a lot of math macros. I wanted to group them together
>> inside foldable box to improve readability and manageabil
Le 30 déc. 09 à 09:59, Murtaza Safri a écrit :
I am typing in a lot of math macros. I wanted to group them together
inside foldable box to improve readability and manageability afforded
by folding the inset box. So I put in a lot of the macros inside Lyx
grey note. However, the output has a lot
Hi
I am typing in a lot of math macros. I wanted to group them together
inside foldable box to improve readability and manageability afforded
by folding the inset box. So I put in a lot of the macros inside Lyx
grey note. However, the output has a lot of new lines and the first
line of my
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 12:23 AM, Dan Kilman wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I am using LyX 1.6.5 on Windows XP installed via the alternative installer.
>
> When I define math macros, they seem to be working just fine while editing
> the document (that is, I can use them).
> Howeve
Hi there,
I am using LyX 1.6.5 on Windows XP installed via the alternative installer.
When I define math macros, they seem to be working just fine while editing
the document (that is, I can use them).
However, when I try to view the document as a PDF or DVI, every part of the
document not using
Dear all,
as I'm at the beginning of a document preparation process I do not want to
decide right now how to decorate vectors, tensors and so on.
For this reason, I chose math macros since at the end of the preparation
I can change the decorations easily by editing only the macro.
I typ
Am 07.04.2008 um 11:44 schrieb G. Milde:
Dear LyX users,
for my thesis, I define a set of about 20 math-macros that reside in a
well commented file math-macros.lyx that is included by the document
file(s).
When I open the document file before opening the math-macro.lyx
file, all
macros will
Dear LyX users,
for my thesis, I define a set of about 20 math-macros that reside in a
well commented file math-macros.lyx that is included by the document
file(s).
When I open the document file before opening the math-macro.lyx file, all
macros will be shown as ERT. Unfortunately, they remain
Dominik Böhm wrote:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 1:42 PM, G. Milde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 19.03.08, Dominik Böhm wrote:
> Is there any more convenient solution for such problems in LyX or is
> the macro-feature a math-only thing?
Currently, there is unfortunately no text-macro availabl
Dominik Böhm schrieb:
I was wondering if one can also use macros for some text things.
This will be possible in the next major lyX release lyX 1.6.0.
For now you have to define new commands using the ERT or the document preamble. The math manaul
explains how to do this (this method is releva
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 1:42 PM, G. Milde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 19.03.08, Dominik Böhm wrote:
>
> > Is there any more convenient solution for such problems in LyX or is
> > the macro-feature a math-only thing?
>
> Currently, there is unfortunately no text-macro available.
Okay, I alre
On 19.03.08, Dominik Böhm wrote:
> Is there any more convenient solution for such problems in LyX or is
> the macro-feature a math-only thing?
Currently, there is unfortunately no text-macro available.
However, if I understand it right lyx 1.6 will come with support in form
of user-configurable
Hello,
I was wondering if one can also use macros for some text things. For
example, I would like to use macros for abbreviations. In German the
abbreviation of "zum Beispiel" is "z.B." with a small space between
"z." and "B.". I realized it by putting
"\newcommand{\realAbkzB}{z.\,B.}" into the pr
Milen Ivanov schrieb:
I have not noticed that the User Guide is also changed with the new
version.
With version 1.5.2 the Userguide is now up to date, Changelog:
http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/DocumentationDevelopment#Status
regards Uwe
: Re: Problem with math macros (how to type pure #)
Milen Ivanov schrieb:
> 1.I type in the minibuffer 'math-macro fun 1' and the macro box
pops up as expected;
> 2.I type in the macro-box f(#1), but the actual source I get is
f(\#1)!
The UserGuide states:
The pla
Milen Ivanov schrieb:
1. I type in the minibuffer 'math-macro fun 1' and the macro box pops up
as expected;
2. I type in the macro-box f(#1), but the actual source I get is f(\#1)!
The UserGuide states:
The placeholder for the arguments are inserted as a backslash and sharp follow
Dear All,
I am using LyX for some months with no problem whatsoever. I think it is a
great tool and great fun.
However, trying to educate myself, I found in the User Guide that there are
macros and decided to try them.
The fun is as follows:
1. I type in the minibuffer 'math
ndard math-macros. I can then include it in any file I wish.
Two tips:
1. LyX will parse the math-macros in an included file and display
them the same way it does when they are declared in the main file.
However, for this to happen, it seems that the included file
(macros.lyx, that
On Sunday 15 October 2006 19:56, Nick Kuzmik wrote:
> I do a lot of math in lyx, and I create a lot of macros on the fly. What's
> the best way to keep them organized? Maybe make it so every file I open
> has all the same macros?
In .lyx/bind/ directory you will find a lot of files, there you can
I do a lot of math in lyx, and I create a lot of macros on the fly. What's
the best way to keep them organized? Maybe make it so every file I open has
all the same macros?
--
Nick Kuzmik
AIM nkuzmik
845-406-5115
> "Heiko" == Heiko Schroeder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Heiko> Dear list, since LyX 1.4.0 is really a very great work, I
Heiko> assume there is a bug in the math-mode which I did not realize
Heiko> in the preview version: I cannot define macros in math-mode
Heiko> with arguments. The argument
Dear list,
since LyX 1.4.0 is really a very great work, I assume there is a bug in the
math-mode which I did not realize in the preview version: I cannot define
macros in math-mode with arguments. The arguments e.g. #1 do not turn red but
remain blue.
Testing the example in the handbook (macro
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004, Fred Nastos wrote:
> The user guide says there is a comment paragraph environment, which I
> interpreted to mean that in the pull-down down where Standard, Caption,
> Itemize, etc. are I would see a Comment section but I can't seem to find
> it. I am using the revtex4 style.
Hi, the Wiki on Math Macros has the following piece piece of information:
### begin paste ###
Changing an existing command
Math-macros translate to \newcommand, i.e. they fail, if the macro name is
already defined.
To change an existing command (and its rendering in Lyx) you can use the
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 01:57:28PM -0400, Matej Cepl wrote:
> Paul Smith wrote:
> > Could somebody here please teach me how to delete a macro?
>
> Just delete its definition in the LyX window. There should not be
> nothing more mysterious than that going around.
Up to the next restart of LyX, lot
> You may have to restart LyX, since the macros (at the moment) are global
> to LyX and might not disappear just because you delete their definition.
> (I don't really know, but since you asked you probably had a problem with
> deleting them).
Yes, Christian, it was necessary to restart LyX. Thank
> Just delete its definition in the LyX window. There should not be
> nothing more mysterious than that going around.
I had already tried it, but it does not delete the macro... well, at least
with the version installed on my computer (LyX 1.3.2). The definition
disappears, but it is still possibl
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Matej Cepl wrote:
> Paul Smith wrote:
> > Could somebody here please teach me how to delete a macro?
>
> Just delete its definition in the LyX window. There should not be
> nothing more mysterious than that going around.
>
You may have to restart LyX, since the macros (at the
Paul Smith wrote:
> Could somebody here please teach me how to delete a macro?
Just delete its definition in the LyX window. There should not be
nothing more mysterious than that going around.
Matej
--
Matej Cepl,
GPG Finger: 89EF 4BC6 288A BF43 1BAB 25C3 E09F EF25 D964 84AC
138 Highland Ave.
Dear All,
Could somebody here please teach me how to delete a macro?
Thank you a lot in advance!
Paul
On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 08:20:21PM -0500, William O. Bray wrote:
> Hello, let me append my last post. The real workaround is to simply put your
> macro as a \newcommand in the preamble and save the doc.
You lose all the visual feedback using this method.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up F
On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 08:05:54PM -0500, William O. Bray wrote:
> Hello, I am using Lyx 1.3 with qt frontend.
> suppose you want a macro for \a^{#1} where #1 is user input.
> In the doc mini-buffer one would type, e.g.,
> math-macro ax 1 (enter)
> This brings up the macro box in the Lyx doc; in th
Hello, let me append my last post. The real workaround is to simply put your
macro as a \newcommand in the preamble and save the doc. It is available
within Lyx as a macro as well as to LaTex for printing purposes.
best regards, b...
--
***
Hello, I am using Lyx 1.3 with qt frontend.
suppose you want a macro for \a^{#1} where #1 is user input.
In the doc mini-buffer one would type, e.g.,
math-macro ax 1 (enter)
This brings up the macro box in the Lyx doc; in the first box you might type
ax (should give the LaTex name for the shortcut
On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 05:26:15PM +0200, Jean-Pierre.Chretien wrote:
> Hmm, doesn't seem to work here.
> What did I misdundestood ?
> Any key binding problem ? C-m says "Mark set" in the minibuffer.
How to you usually enter "simple math mode"?
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in
>>To: "Jean-Pierre.Chretien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Subject: Re: Can't create math macros in 1.2.0?
>>From: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Date: 30 May 2002 17:46:15 +0200
>>
> "Jean-Pierre" == Jean-Pierre Chretien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> [snip]
>>> Apart from that, you can now just type
>>> \newcommand{\foo}[2]{#1+#2} in the main LyX text, mark it, and
>>> press to convert it to math.
Jean-Pierre> Hmm, doesn't seem to work here. What did I misdundestood
>[snip]
>>
>>Apart from that, you can now just type \newcommand{\foo}[2]{#1+#2} in the
>>main LyX text, mark it, and press to convert it to math.
Hmm, doesn't seem to work here.
What did I misdundestood ?
Any key binding problem ? C-m says "Mark set" in the minibuffer.
--
Jean-Pierre
1 - 100 of 117 matches
Mail list logo
