>> Why isn't LyX using my preview definition for the macro with some
>> placeholder boxes as the arguments?
>
> Navigation between the arguments is non-obvious.
> Macro arguments can be used more than once.
But as I understand the second part of the macro is the editing template.
That uses a "
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Why isn't LyX using my preview definition for the macro with some
>> placeholder boxes as the arguments?
Andre> Navigation between the arguments is non-obvious. Macro
Andre> arguments can be used more than once.
We could decide that o
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 01:54:06PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> It used to do that, but this was changed in 1.3.x (I think).
1.2 with the math rewrite (I think)
> One particular problem (which could be avoided) was to know what to do
> when for example #1 is used twice.
This did not work
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 11:24:23AM +, Stefan Schimanski wrote:
> Everything looks great until I try to edit the arguments of the
> macro: LyX jumps into a third representation with several line
> prefixed with #1, #2 to enter the arguments. Is it supposed to work
> like that?
Sort of,
> "Stefan" == Stefan Schimanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Stefan> Everything looks great until I try to edit the arguments
Stefan> of the macro: LyX jumps into a third representation with
Stefan> several line prefixed with #1, #2 to enter the arguments. Is
Stefan> it supposed to work li
Hi!
I want to make heavy use of math-macros to create type inference rules
using proof.sty. I defined some macros using the \frac construct in
the right box of the math-macro definition as preview, with several
arguments #1, #2, ... In the left box I use the corresponding commands
from proof.s
