Am 26.09.2014 um 23:18 schrieb Julien Rioux:
On 26/09/2014 5:07 PM, Benedict Holland wrote:
Wouldn't that change the default for every document using that
particular style though? If this is only for one journal, modification
of style files would not only be overkill, but would impact future wo
On 26/09/2014 5:07 PM, Benedict Holland wrote:
Wouldn't that change the default for every document using that
particular style though? If this is only for one journal, modification
of style files would not only be overkill, but would impact future work
in unexpected ways. To get the desired resul
Wouldn't that change the default for every document using that particular
style though? If this is only for one journal, modification of style files
would not only be overkill, but would impact future work in unexpected
ways. To get the desired results, it would be best to limit it to document
spec
On 26/09/2014 9:38 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
Am 26.09.2014 um 15:34 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
I use spbasic (Springer Publ) as the bibstyle
(Koma script book)
and get the citations in the text right (Author1, X et al)
However, in the references all Coauthors are cited. How can I resrict
i
I would say that what could go wrong is your references might need to be
cleaned up. I know that was the huge shift for me. The major difference
(and in my opinion a terrible decision) is that biblatex assumed that your
bib file is valid latex code. That means that all reserved characters are
escap
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann <
engelm...@uni-tuebingen.de> wrote:
>
> Am 26.09.2014 um 18:02 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
>
>> Thanks, Benedict.
>> How difficult is it to switch to biblatex and what can go wrong?
>> Wolfgang
>>
> And what about biber under lyx?
Biber/bibla
Am 26.09.2014 um 18:02 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
Thanks, Benedict.
How difficult is it to switch to biblatex and what can go wrong?
Wolfgang
And what about biber under lyx?
Wolfgang
Am 26.09.2014 um 17:37 schrieb Benedict Holland:
You should use biblatex. It has the ability to do this. For
Thanks, Benedict.
How difficult is it to switch to biblatex and what can go wrong?
Wolfgang
Am 26.09.2014 um 17:37 schrieb Benedict Holland:
You should use biblatex. It has the ability to do this. For my example,
\usepackage[
uniquename=false,
uniquelist=false,
maxcitenames=2,
mincitenames=
You should use biblatex. It has the ability to do this. For my example,
\usepackage[
uniquename=false,
uniquelist=false,
maxcitenames=2,
mincitenames=1,
maxbibnames=200,
minbibnames=1,
natbib=true,
url=false,
doi=false,
isbn=false,
eprint=false,
backref=false,
backend=biber,
style=au
Am 26.09.2014 um 15:34 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
I use spbasic (Springer Publ) as the bibstyle
(Koma script book)
and get the citations in the text right (Author1, X et al)
However, in the references all Coauthors are cited. How can I resrict
it to 3?
I tried to find an answer in the net, ad
I use spbasic (Springer Publ) as the bibstyle
(Koma script book)
and get the citations in the text right (Author1, X et al)
However, in the references all Coauthors are cited. How can I resrict it
to 3?
I tried to find an answer in the net, adding
\usepackage{natbib} to the preamble did not help
11 matches
Mail list logo
