>>Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2000 15:49:08 -0600
>>From: Josh Rigler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Subject: Re: exporting to html with lyx
>>
>>"Lars Gullik Bjønnes" wrote:
>>>
>>> Josh Rigler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Lars Gullik Bjønnes" wrote:
>
> Josh Rigler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Not to question your expertise, or the quality of LyX (I love it) but I
> | disagree. LaTeX2html (using LaTeX) parses the code perfectly.
>
> latex2html has a problem with using latex packages that it don't know
> of
Josh Rigler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Not to question your expertise, or the quality of LyX (I love it) but I
| disagree. LaTeX2html (using LaTeX) parses the code perfectly.
latex2html has a problem with using latex packages that it don't know
of (it should try to use kpathsea like latex doe
"Lars Gullik Bjønnes" wrote:
>
> Note also that this whole problem is not due to a bug in LyX, but to a
> bug in latex2html, so it really teh latex2html guys that you should
> complain to.
>
> Lgb
Not to question your expertise, or the quality of LyX (I love it) but I
disagree. LaTeX2ht
Josh Rigler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I want you to replace this:
| > | \IfFileExists{url.sty}{\usepackage{url}}
| > | {\newcommand{\url}{\texttt}}
with this:
| > \IfFileExists{url.sty}{%
| > \usepackage{url}%
| > }{%
| > \newcommand{url}{\texttt}%
| > }
| >
| > an
"Lars Gullik Bjønnes" wrote:
>
> Josh Rigler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | This has been asked many times, yet I have yet to read a reasonable
> | answer. Why does LyX insist on redefining the \url tag to a plain text
> | tag? This kind of defeats the purpose of exporting to html, NO? Thi
Josh Rigler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| This has been asked many times, yet I have yet to read a reasonable
| answer. Why does LyX insist on redefining the \url tag to a plain text
| tag? This kind of defeats the purpose of exporting to html, NO? This
| is too obvious a flaw to be a bug, it
This has been asked many times, yet I have yet to read a reasonable
answer. Why does LyX insist on redefining the \url tag to a plain text
tag? This kind of defeats the purpose of exporting to html, NO? This
is too obvious a flaw to be a bug, it must be intentional, but for the
life of me, I ca
