Jean-Pierre.Chretien wrote:
> By the way, the currect workaround I use to solve this for video
> presention is to export each page as an eps and to build a new
> document including these graphics.
Sorry, you've lost me.
--
Angus
>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>From: Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Subject: Re: different image orientation with pdf and pdflatex
>>Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 11:25:19 +0100
>>X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: host217-44-83-78.range217-44.btcentralplus.com
>>
>&
Jean-Pierre.Chretien wrote:
> This has been discussed already in the list, what is the status to
> deal with this (boring) problem ?
> - upgrade gs ? (AFPL Ghostscript 7.04 here)
> - use an overlooked gs option preventing this (I thought that
> asking for compatibility with pdf 1.1 could do it,
>>Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2004 20:32:21 +0200
>>From: Uwe Stöhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>To: Charlls Quarra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Subject: Re: different image orientation with pdf and pdflatex
>>
>>> I've noted that
I've noted that in AMS unnumbered report and in
KomaScript book documents (maybe also in some others
or all the others document styles, dont know) the
graphics images are placed in pdflatex exports 90
degrees relative to pdf exports
Why is this happening?
This happens in all document classes. Pd
Hi,
I've noted that in AMS unnumbered report and in
KomaScript book documents (maybe also in some others
or all the others document styles, dont know) the
graphics images are placed in pdflatex exports 90
degrees relative to pdf exports
Why is this happening?
Los mejores u
