Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> William R. Buckley schrieb:
>>> Interesting to me is
>>> that Andre Pönitz vociferously and rudely suggested to me
>>> that the problem must be resident in Window, the OS.
As somebody who has enjoyed the ``André experience'', describing him
as 'vocifer
William R. Buckley schrieb:
Telling me, even suggesting to me, how I should react to the
written words of others is rude.
The telling is what is rude.
> You treated me rudely when you suggested how I should be
> affected by the written words of others.
What, it is rude that I said you shouldn'
William R. Buckley schrieb:
For instance, consider the attached paper, which includes
many different fonts.
I should add that this paper has been published.
This is no excuse ;-), I have read books, written in Word and directly
published.
One font is not always a desirable condition.
> Ag
On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 11:57:55AM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> William R. Buckley schrieb:
>> Interesting to me is
>> that Andre Pönitz vociferously and rudely suggested to me
>> that the problem must be resident in Window, the OS.
Are you refering to
http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-users@lists.
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> (or found, for traditionalists)
I feel the traditionalists attacking. Of course, it's spelled "fount".
Jürgen
Rich Shepard wrote:
> It seems a very common misconception. Too many people use the word 'font'
> when they refer to 'typeface.' A 'font' is a particular typeface
> (Palatino, Amerigo, Bookman), shape (Roman, Slant, Italic), weight
> (normal, bold, thin), and size (10pt, 11pt, 12pt). That's why yo
On Wed, 9 Apr 2008, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
You mix "fonts" and "font shapes".
It seems a very common misconception. Too many people use the word 'font'
when they refer to 'typeface.' A 'font' is a particular typeface (Palatino,
Amerigo, Bookman), shape (Roman, Slant, Italic), weight (normal, bold,
William R. Buckley schrieb:
On this point, you and I strongly disagree. There are many
times when a document could benefit by the use of more
than one font. I can send you example documents which
do use several fonts, and would be difficult to fathom if only
one font were used.
You mix "font
William R. Buckley schrieb:
I have learned from where most of the text formatting is controlled,
and it is surprisingly easy. Don't understand why I can't there also
find *strikeout* among the forms.
Because the LateX-packages that support this are not yet ready for Unicode (non latin) charac
On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 11:15:13AM -0700, William R. Buckley wrote:
Hi Francis.
> First, I vote for LICK.
Usually the right of naming a child belongs to the parents, so I really
wonder why _this_ discussion pops up every second year or so...
Andre'
PS: I surely forgot one or two of those again
First, I vote for LICK.
If the goal is to be a TeX product, then extend the language, and
avoid the sound of plurality,
Second, I think LyX has a wonderful potential, and a magnificently
executed actual.
I have learned from where most of the text formatting is controlled,
and it is surprisingly
11 matches
Mail list logo
