Re: Time stamp is off

2023-06-20 Thread Stephan Witt
Am 19.06.2023 um 21:30 schrieb R. H. van der Gaag : > > On 19 Jun 2023, at 18:46, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: >> >> On 6/19/23 09:36, R. H. van der Gaag wrote: >>> >>> Thanks for checking. Insert date gives the correct (Dutch) time here, too. >>> But the time stamps added to the LaTeX preview

Re: Time stamp is off

2023-06-20 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
On 6/19/23 15:30, R. H. van der Gaag wrote: On 19 Jun 2023, at 18:46, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: On 6/19/23 09:36, R. H. van der Gaag wrote: Thanks for checking. Insert date gives the correct (Dutch) time here, too. But the time stamps added to the LaTeX preview are always exactly two hours

Re: Time stamp is off

2023-06-19 Thread R. H. van der Gaag
On 19 Jun 2023, at 18:46, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > > On 6/19/23 09:36, R. H. van der Gaag wrote: >> >> Thanks for checking. Insert date gives the correct (Dutch) time here, too. >> But the time stamps added to the LaTeX preview are always exactly two hours >> behind. A riddle. > > Two h

Re: Time stamp is off

2023-06-19 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
On 6/19/23 09:36, R. H. van der Gaag wrote: Thanks for checking. Insert date gives the correct (Dutch) time here, too. But the time stamps added to the LaTeX preview are always exactly two hours behind. A riddle. Two hours behind sounds like UCT (GMT). European time is one hour ahead but th

Re: Time stamp is off

2023-06-19 Thread R. H. van der Gaag
> On 18 Jun 2023, at 20:24, wrote: > >> -Oorspronkelijk bericht- >> Van: lyx-users Namens R. H. van der Gaag >> Verzonden: zondag 18 juni 2023 15:10 > ... >> On 18 Jun 2023, at 15:01, Maria Gouskova wrote: >> >>> On Sun, Jun 18, 2023 at 7:22 AM R. H. van der Gaag >> wrote: >>> Hi al

RE: Time stamp is off

2023-06-18 Thread kzstatis
> -Oorspronkelijk bericht- > Van: lyx-users Namens R. H. van der Gaag > Verzonden: zondag 18 juni 2023 15:10 ... > On 18 Jun 2023, at 15:01, Maria Gouskova wrote: > > > On Sun, Jun 18, 2023 at 7:22 AM R. H. van der Gaag > wrote: > > Hi all, > > I noticed the time stamp on tracked change

Re: Time stamp is off

2023-06-18 Thread R. H. van der Gaag
On 18 Jun 2023, at 15:01, Maria Gouskova wrote: > On Sun, Jun 18, 2023 at 7:22 AM R. H. van der Gaag > wrote: > Hi all, > I noticed the time stamp on tracked changes is two hours off. Solutions found > online seem to fail. Is there a way to get correct time stamps? > > I cannot reproduce this

Re: Time stamp is off

2023-06-18 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Sonntag, dem 18.06.2023 um 13:21 +0200 schrieb R. H. van der Gaag: > I noticed the time stamp on tracked changes is two hours off. > Solutions found online seem to fail. Is there a way to get correct > time stamps? The time stamp is retrieved from the C++ time() function. Are you sure your syst

Re: Time stamp is off

2023-06-18 Thread Maria Gouskova
On Sun, Jun 18, 2023 at 7:22 AM R. H. van der Gaag wrote: > Hi all, > I noticed the time stamp on tracked changes is two hours off. Solutions > found online seem to fail. Is there a way to get correct time stamps? > I cannot reproduce this here--my time stamps look correct. I am using LyX 2.3.6

Time stamp is off

2023-06-18 Thread R. H. van der Gaag
Hi all, I noticed the time stamp on tracked changes is two hours off. Solutions found online seem to fail. Is there a way to get correct time stamps? Thanks. RH -- lyx-users mailing list lyx-users@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users