However, as Rich said, LaTeX is so versatile that you can force it to
make ugly manuscripts.
I don't know how this is relevant.
To return to the original point of this thread:
I'm looking for something superior to OOo for formatting my manuscripts.
They are required to be in "standard manu
On Thu, 7 Feb 2008 15:50:50 -0500
Bill Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In response to Typhoon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> > However, as Rich said, LaTeX is so versatile that you can force it
> > to make ugly manuscripts.
>
> I don't know how this is relevant.
>
> To return to the original
In response to Typhoon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, 7 Feb 2008 13:28:25 -0500
> Bill Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> It does seem to me that the manuscript format recommended by the web
> page is somewhat outdated. Even the author notes that an earlier
> version was "reprinted" in 19
On Thu, 7 Feb 2008 13:28:25 -0500
Bill Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In response to Rich Shepard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > On Thu, 7 Feb 2008, Bill Moran wrote:
> >
> > > Anyone know of a template for "standard manuscript format" ...
In response to Rich Shepard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, 7 Feb 2008, Bill Moran wrote:
>
> > Anyone know of a template for "standard manuscript format" ... as
> > described here, for example: http://www.shunn.net/format/story.html
>
>I don't
On Thu, 7 Feb 2008, Bill Moran wrote:
Anyone know of a template for "standard manuscript format" ... as
described here, for example: http://www.shunn.net/format/story.html
I don't know where he gets his ideas, but if you want to emulate that, use
the article class with a mono
Anyone know of a template for "standard manuscript format" ... as
described here, for example:
http://www.shunn.net/format/story.html
--
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com
