Sorry for what? That your life interfered with providing a free
service to the community? Gosh... shame on you! :)
Yaron
On Jun 28, 2006, at 7:06 AM, Bennett Helm wrote:
On Jun 28, 2006, at 4:45 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Yaron" == Yaron Y Goland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On Jun 28, 2006, at 4:45 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Yaron" == Yaron Y Goland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Yaron> First, THANK YOU! I love LyX! And the integration that 1.4.x
Yaron> provided into OS X is great. It is still too slow for me to use
Yaron> but the direction is great and in the
> "Yaron" == Yaron Y Goland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Yaron> First, THANK YOU! I love LyX! And the integration that 1.4.x
Yaron> provided into OS X is great. It is still too slow for me to use
Yaron> but the direction is great and in the meantime I can use 1.3.7
Yaron> which performs just fi
First, THANK YOU! I love LyX! And the integration that 1.4.x provided
into OS X is great. It is still too slow for me to use but the
direction is great and in the meantime I can use 1.3.7 which performs
just fine on my mac.
Second, any idea when 1.4.2 might be released?
Thanks,
> "Steve" == Steve Litt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> If you ever upgrade to 1.4, you will find that the display is
>> significantly slower with qt (for a reason we do not really
>> understand). The old xforms version is still ugly, but snappy.
Steve> Do I need to recompile to switch to Xfor
On Monday 26 June 2006 05:52 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Steve" == Steve Litt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Steve> So I officially withdraw my objections to qt. I've been using
> Steve> it the past several months, thinking it was Xforms, and liking
> Steve> it just fine.
>
> :)
>
> I
> "Steve" == Steve Litt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Steve> So I officially withdraw my objections to qt. I've been using
Steve> it the past several months, thinking it was Xforms, and liking
Steve> it just fine.
:)
If you ever upgrade to 1.4, you will find that the display is
significantly s
On Monday 26 June 2006 04:32 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Steve" == Steve Litt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Steve> On Monday 26 June 2006 02:14 pm, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> >> Steve Litt wrote: > Is the default graphics library on LyX 1.4 Qt?
> >>
> >> Yes. It already was in LyX
> "Steve" == Steve Litt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Steve> On Monday 26 June 2006 02:14 pm, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
>> Steve Litt wrote: > Is the default graphics library on LyX 1.4 Qt?
>>
>> Yes. It already was in LyX 1.3 IIRC.
Steve> That's interesting. I use 1.3.5 currently. How can I
> "Juergen" == Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> Steve Litt wrote:
>> Is the default graphics library on LyX 1.4 Qt?
Juergen> Yes. It already was in LyX 1.3 IIRC.
No, then xforms was the default.
JMarc
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Is the default graphics library on LyX 1.4 Qt?
Georg> Yes.
Well, not really. Now there is no default :)
JMarc
On Monday 26 June 2006 02:14 pm, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Steve Litt wrote:
> > Is the default graphics library on LyX 1.4 Qt?
>
> Yes. It already was in LyX 1.3 IIRC.
That's interesting. I use 1.3.5 currently. How can I tell whether I'm using
Xforms or Qt? I assumed Xforms because it looks
Steve Litt wrote:
> Is the default graphics library on LyX 1.4 Qt?
Yes. It already was in LyX 1.3 IIRC.
> Ughh. Is Xforms still
> available?
Yes. Still.
Jürgen
Steve Litt wrote:
> On Monday 26 June 2006 11:42 am, Bennett Helm wrote:
>> On Jun 26, 2006, at 11:26 AM, Steve Litt wrote:
>> > Hi Yaron,
>> >
>> > I've never used LyX 1.4.x, but from what I understand they've made
>> > LyX support
>> > multiple graphics libraries, whereas in the old days it was
On Jun 26, 2006, at 1:59 PM, Steve Litt wrote:
On Monday 26 June 2006 11:42 am, Bennett Helm wrote:
On Jun 26, 2006, at 11:26 AM, Steve Litt wrote:
Hi Yaron,
I've never used LyX 1.4.x, but from what I understand they've made
LyX support
multiple graphics libraries, whereas in the old days it
On Monday 26 June 2006 11:42 am, Bennett Helm wrote:
> On Jun 26, 2006, at 11:26 AM, Steve Litt wrote:
> > Hi Yaron,
> >
> > I've never used LyX 1.4.x, but from what I understand they've made
> > LyX support
> > multiple graphics libraries, whereas in the old days it was just
> > Xforms. See
> > if
On Jun 26, 2006, at 11:26 AM, Steve Litt wrote:
Hi Yaron,
I've never used LyX 1.4.x, but from what I understand they've made
LyX support
multiple graphics libraries, whereas in the old days it was just
Xforms. See
if there's any way to configure your LyX so it uses Xforms rather
than KDE
On Monday 26 June 2006 01:54 am, Yaron Y. Goland wrote:
> When I first installed LyX 1.4.0 on OS X I had such serious
> performance problems that even on my dual proc G5 with 1 gig of Ram I
> could trivially type faster than LyX could print out my characters.
> So when LyX 1.4.1 was released with a
> "Yaron" == Yaron Y Goland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Yaron> When I first installed LyX 1.4.0 on OS X I had such serious
Yaron> performance problems that even on my dual proc G5 with 1 gig of
Yaron> Ram I could trivially type faster than LyX could print out my
Yaron> characters. So when LyX
When I first installed LyX 1.4.0 on OS X I had such serious
performance problems that even on my dual proc G5 with 1 gig of Ram I
could trivially type faster than LyX could print out my characters.
So when LyX 1.4.1 was released with a focus on performance I was very
excited. Unfortunately
20 matches
Mail list logo
