> "Rich" == Rich Shepard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Rich> On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, John Levon wrote:
>> I run all LyX versions fine on RH 7.0. Do you mean the binary RPMs
>> won't install ? You can do rpm --rebuild lyx-1.2.1.src.rpm then
>> install the resulting binary
Rich> John,
Rich> I re
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, John Levon wrote:
> I run all LyX versions fine on RH 7.0. Do you mean the binary RPMs won't
> install ? You can do rpm --rebuild lyx-1.2.1.src.rpm then install the
> resulting binary
John,
I rebuilt both the 1.2.0 and 1.2.1 src.rpms and they installed just fine.
No error
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 12:07:02PM -0700, Rich Shepard wrote:
> Thanks, John. Neither do the 1.2.x versions work on my system. Guess I
> need to wait until I upgrade the workstations to RH 7.3 (scheduled for
> tomorrow) before I can run the latest and greatest.
I run all LyX versions fine on R
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, John Levon wrote:
> Don't, it doesn't work.
Thanks, John. Neither do the 1.2.x versions work on my system. Guess I
need to wait until I upgrade the workstations to RH 7.3 (scheduled for
tomorrow) before I can run the latest and greatest.
Rich
Dr. Richard B. Shepard, Pres
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 11:38:22AM -0700, Rich Shepard wrote:
> I'm rebuilding 1.2.1 from the tarball now to see if I get results
> different from rebuilding the src.rpm. I notice that both the xforms and qt
> UIs are apparently available. How do I specify the qt flavor rather than the
> xforms
I'm rebuilding 1.2.1 from the tarball now to see if I get results
different from rebuilding the src.rpm. I notice that both the xforms and qt
UIs are apparently available. How do I specify the qt flavor rather than the
xforms version?
Thanks,
Rich
Dr. Richard B. Shepard, President
