Florin Oprina wrote:
So is there any way in bibtex + natbib to get the "Author 1976 [1600]"
citation without messing with the year field in the bibtex database? I
thought the "key" field would do the job, but is seems that if you have an
"author", it is ignored.
Yes, you can get that, but not
So is there any way in bibtex + natbib to get the "Author 1976 [1600]"
citation without messing with the year field in the bibtex database? I
thought the "key" field would do the job, but is seems that if you have an
"author", it is ignored.
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 4:30 PM, Julio Rojas <[EMAIL PROT
Thanks a lot guys. I'll stick to the "Note" field then.
-
Julio Rojas
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 10:34 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Julio Rojas wrote:
>
>> Thank you all for your answers, they have been of great help. Still,
>> t
Julio Rojas wrote:
> Thank you all for your answers, they have been of great help. Still,
> the main technical question, the how do I do it in BibTeX, remains
> unanswered. Is there a "Note" or "Previously Published" field in
> BibTeX? How do I solve this problem using the available fields?
>
The
killermike wrote:
>>
> This is something I have have often wondered about too. For example, if
> you have a book that was written in 1600 but your copy is a 1976
> paperback, what do you put for the date?
That's part of the protocol you're using for citing sources, which is
a question for you a
ud of how helpful you arem not only with
> LyX, but with the whole LaTeX package.
> -
> Julio Rojas
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 8:24 PM, rgheck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> killermike wrote
heck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> killermike wrote:
>>
>> Julio Rojas wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi, does anyone know hot to handle reprinted material using Bibtex? I
>>> have a book which has been reprinted. Should I add the year of the
>>> original printing
killermike wrote:
Julio Rojas wrote:
Hi, does anyone know hot to handle reprinted material using Bibtex? I
have a book which has been reprinted. Should I add the year of the
original printing to the title? Should I just stick to the reprinted
book information? Or is there a "proper" w
True, this seems to be the most honest way. However, if I see the
citation: Darwin (1997), it looks a bit strange, like Darwin's still
alive and publishing . On the othe hand, if I see Darwin (1859), I now
it's "The Origin of Species", so I won't even have to look at the
bibliography.
On Fri, Aug
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008, killermike wrote:
This is something I have have often wondered about too. For example, if
you have a book that was written in 1600 but your copy is a 1976
paperback, what do you put for the date?
I would use ". 1976. . . Reprint of original 1600
manuscript." That's accur
Julio Rojas wrote:
Hi, does anyone know hot to handle reprinted material using Bibtex? I
have a book which has been reprinted. Should I add the year of the
original printing to the title? Should I just stick to the reprinted
book information? Or is there a "proper" way to cite repri
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008, Julio Rojas wrote:
Hi, does anyone know hot to handle reprinted material using Bibtex? I have
a book which has been reprinted. Should I add the year of the original
printing to the title? Should I just stick to the reprinted book
information? Or is there a "proper&qu
Hi, does anyone know hot to handle reprinted material using Bibtex? I
have a book which has been reprinted. Should I add the year of the
original printing to the title? Should I just stick to the reprinted
book information? Or is there a "proper" way to cite reprinted books
using Bibte
13 matches
Mail list logo
