Angus Leeming wrote:
> I thought you were unhappy with the broken "placement of big
> operators like \sum and \int"? This is a bug in the old but 'free'
> Qt/Win 2.3.x which LyX uses and will remain until someone buys a
> Qt-commercial licence and donates it to either Ruurd or lyx.org.
Unless you
>> May I say: if I've understood his point, I really don't think this
>> ("not much point in distributing ...") is an issue. Ruurd's port
>> means that people don't have to build lyx for themselves, and that,
>> to many MSWindows users, is precisely the attraction of the port.
>> Otherwise, one co
Philip A. Viton wrote:
> Jean-Marc wrote:
>
>
> This has been recently discussed on the developers list, and I do
> not think there was a consensus on this point. There is not much
> point in distributing a free software that people cannot build
> themselves without buying a commercial packages.
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Philip A. Viton wrote:
>> For me, the disappointment was that the placement of big operators
>> like \sum and \int hasn't been fixed (can anyone confirm this?).
>> Presumably this is because Ruurd is still using the same edition of
Philip A. Viton wrote:
> For me, the disappointment was that the placement of big operators
> like \sum and \int hasn't been fixed (can anyone confirm this?).
> Presumably this is because Ruurd is still using the same edition of
> Qt, and it's a Qt, not really a lyx, problem.
That is correct. Ruu
Philip A. Viton wrote:
Just in case you hadn't noticed: ruurd has a distribution of 1.3.3
available. (Haven't tried it yet, still downloading).
Thanks for the heads up Philip, and thanks Ruurd.
I've just downloaded it and tried it out, seems to work ok for me so far.
Couple of things I've noticed:
